Talk:List of films considered the worst: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:List of films considered the worst/Archive 15) (bot |
→Semi-protected edit request on 11 October 2023: new section |
||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
Just wondering if there is movement here? This movie is building momentum on being one of the worst movies ever made. It was |
Just wondering if there is movement here? This movie is building momentum on being one of the worst movies ever made. It was |
||
also on the podcast HDTYM if that helps. Also lots of article discussing it. [[Special:Contributions/142.161.77.32|142.161.77.32]] ([[User talk:142.161.77.32|talk]]) 05:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC) |
also on the podcast HDTYM if that helps. Also lots of article discussing it. [[Special:Contributions/142.161.77.32|142.161.77.32]] ([[User talk:142.161.77.32|talk]]) 05:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Semi-protected edit request on 11 October 2023 == |
|||
{{edit semi-protected|List of films considered the worst|answered=no}} |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/75.188.34.162|75.188.34.162]] ([[User talk:75.188.34.162|talk]]) 01:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Marmaduke (2022) |
|||
This computer-animated comedy film was universally panned by critics at its May 2022 release. It has a 0% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. One critic said “Marmaduke is a steaming pile of poop. If you step into this movie, you’d need a stick to scrape squished Marmaduke from the treads of your shoes. As the saying goes, you can’t polish a turd - but it doesn’t seem like anyone here ever tried,” |
Revision as of 01:31, 11 October 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of films considered the worst article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is frequently the subject of strong objections to its existence or naming. If you wish to comment on it, you are welcome to do so. Note, however, that rants, soapboxing, diatribes, insults or empty or needlessly heated oratory violate multiple policies and guidelines and are NOT welcome.
|
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Article needs a LOT of revision, and maybe even deletion?
Far too many "poor films" listed in this article - as opposed to truly awful films. Likewise also a lot of very minor B movies. And that, surely, is not the point of this article? A lot of the films need removing as cinematically insignificant. And, maybe, given that this is a "list"... the whole thing should just be deleted. 37.250.141.158 (talk) 21:57, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- I've said this before and I'll say it again: this article is one of the best policed articles of its kind on Wikipedia. If you monitor the talk page for long enough you'll see just how many proposals are rejected and how many citations are needed for entry. I worked with other editors to ensure "Cats" was included, and it wasn't easy. This article will always need tidying, but deletion is simply for the birds. doktorb wordsdeeds 23:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, the list is just fine.LM2000 (talk) 12:06, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 September 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Cat in the Hat (2003)
An adaptation of Dr. Seuss' 1957 book of the same name, The Cat in the Hat stars Mike Myers in the title role. The film was widely criticised for it's screenplay, over use of adult humor, lack of faithfulness to the source material, performances (particularly Myers') and the appearance of the title character. Peter Travers of Rolling Stone gave the film one star, stating: "Cat, another overblown Hollywood raid on Dr. Seuss, has a draw on Mike Myers, who inexplicably plays the Cat by mimicking Bert Lahr in The Wizard of Oz." Roger Ebert of The Chicago Sun-Times gave the film two out of four stars. Although he praised the production design, he considered the film to be "all effects and stunts and CGI and prosthetics, with no room for lightness and joy". Ebert and co-host Richard Roeper gave the film "Two Thumbs Down" on their weekly movie review program. Roeper said of Myers' performance that "maybe a part of him was realizing as the movie was being made that a live-action version of The Cat in the Hat just wasn't a great idea." Ebert compared the film unfavorably to How the Grinch Stole Christmas: "If there is one thing I've learned from these two movies, it's that we don't want to see Jim Carrey as a Grinch, and we don't want to see Mike Myers as a cat. These are talented comedians, let's see them do their stuff, don't bury them under a ton of technology." The film holds the 10% on Rotten Tomatoes with the consensus reading "Filled with double entendres and potty humor, this Cat falls flat." Audrey Geisel, Suess' widow, decided not to allow any live action adaptations of her late husband's work, ending Myers' plans for a sequel. Epikvik (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Not done Too good for this list; appears on Talk:List of films considered the worst/Removed films.LM2000 (talk) 08:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Is The Snowman being considered? No reply (see above)
Just wondering if there is movement here? This movie is building momentum on being one of the worst movies ever made. It was also on the podcast HDTYM if that helps. Also lots of article discussing it. 142.161.77.32 (talk) 05:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 October 2023
It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at List of films considered the worst. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
75.188.34.162 (talk) 01:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Marmaduke (2022) This computer-animated comedy film was universally panned by critics at its May 2022 release. It has a 0% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. One critic said “Marmaduke is a steaming pile of poop. If you step into this movie, you’d need a stick to scrape squished Marmaduke from the treads of your shoes. As the saying goes, you can’t polish a turd - but it doesn’t seem like anyone here ever tried,”