Talk:Global Strategy Group: Difference between revisions
→Updating History and organization section: new section |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Thank you! [[User:ES at Global Strategy Group|ES at Global Strategy Group]] ([[User talk:ES at Global Strategy Group|talk]]) 14:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC) |
Thank you! [[User:ES at Global Strategy Group|ES at Global Strategy Group]] ([[User talk:ES at Global Strategy Group|talk]]) 14:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Reaching out to [[User:Drm310]], to see if they would like to review my revised section draft. No pressure, Drm, but since you added my username to the top of this Talk page, I thought I would see if you're interested. [[User:ES at Global Strategy Group|ES at Global Strategy Group]] ([[User talk:ES at Global Strategy Group|talk]]) 13:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:56, 18 October 2023
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 November 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Updating History and organization section
Hello,
I'm a Global Strategy Group employee who has been tasked with updating the firm's article. I want to go about this the right way, so I'll be abundantly clear about my COI and will suggest edits rather than making direct changes to the GSG page. For my first request, I wanted to ask if editors would consider making changes to the History and organization section, which currently contains a few inaccuracies and informational gaps. It also lacks secondary sourcing, which I understand is important for substantiating claims on Wikipedia.
If you follow this link, it will take you to a subsection of my user page, where I have uploaded a revised section draft that I believe fixes these issues and improves the section overall. On that page, you will see: 1.) the current section; 2.) my revised section draft; and 3.) a list of all the changes I'm proposing, in the order they appear within the draft.
Please feel free to critique my draft. I've read up on Wikipedia's content guidelines and done my best to make sure all the language I've drafted aligns with it, but I'm obviously an interested party and understand that compromise might be necessary.
Thank you! ES at Global Strategy Group (talk) 14:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Reaching out to User:Drm310, to see if they would like to review my revised section draft. No pressure, Drm, but since you added my username to the top of this Talk page, I thought I would see if you're interested. ES at Global Strategy Group (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions