Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions
Requesting protection for Tucker Carlson |
→Tucker Carlson: indef extended |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
* {{pagelinks|Tucker Carlson}} |
* {{pagelinks|Tucker Carlson}} |
||
'''Reason:''' WP:GS/RUSUKR [[User:Ccole2006|Ccole2006]] ([[User talk:Ccole2006|talk]]) 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
'''Reason:''' WP:GS/RUSUKR [[User:Ccole2006|Ccole2006]] ([[User talk:Ccole2006|talk]]) 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
:[[File:Pictogram voting support.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''[[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Extended confirmed protection|Extended confirmed protected]]''' '''indefinitely'''.<!-- Template:RFPP#excp --> I feel like this is stretching even the definition of "broadly construed", but okay. Anyone should feel free to revert this if you disagree. [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 06:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:57, 8 February 2024
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 174.228.128.0/18 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. Not seeing enough disruption to warrant protection on top of that. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Added CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Live updates. Or stop user 213.110.126.122 doing that after having been warned multiple times. Island92 (talk) 21:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined The user has stopped. As I said at AIV, they need to be warned more. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Constant disruptive editing by IPs over many months. GraziePrego (talk) 23:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Almost no editing in the last 24 hours. But I have put a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. copyvio issues Geardona (talk to me?) 01:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Declined The copyvio issues appear to have been resolved, and the article was just created today. I have created a talk page with a CTOPS notice. Let's see how things play out. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Also apparent sock puppetry to reinstate unsourced content. Possible WP:COI issues too. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 04:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Looks like vandalism whereby I have described the person as a 'public intellectual' citing sources and an editor has been changing it to 'author'; that Wikipedia account appears created specifically to work on this Wiki page. AltruisticHomoSapien (talk) 05:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Declined as this isn't vandalism, it is a content dispute. It needs to go to the talk page of the article. Dennis Brown 2¢ 06:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IPs changing birthdate against sourcing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GS/RUSUKR Ccole2006 (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. I feel like this is stretching even the definition of "broadly construed", but okay. Anyone should feel free to revert this if you disagree. Chetsford (talk) 06:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
