User:BD2412/Archive 002

Status: Active. bd2412 T Dispute resolution clause: By posting on my user talk page, you agree to resolve all disputes that may arise from your interactions with me through the dispute resolution processes offered within the Wikipedia Community. BD2412 Note: If you are visiting to express concerns because I have edited your user page to fix a disambiguation link, please bear in mind: I assume that you have the link there because you wish to point readers to the proper term (e.g "I speak Greek" or "I am Greek"). It makes it much easier for those of us who are cleaning up disambiguation links from articles if there are fewer user pages cluttering up the "What links here" page. Cheers! BD2412 Talk page archives I have divided my archived pages by topic, rather than by date: User:BD2412/Archive - Law the law, or articles on law-related topics (cases, doctrines, judges, professors, etc). User:BD2412/Archive - Articles all other Wikipedia articles. User:BD2412/Archive - Deletion AfD votes, policies, and mechanics. User:BD2412/Archive - RfA Requests for Administration and Requests for Comment. User:BD2412/Archive - Tools Wikitools (templates, categories, disambigs, etc.) and Wikiprojects (Disambiguation repair, Red link repair, Duplicated section repair, etc.). User:BD2412/Archive - Vandalism vandalism-related discussions, particularly requests to deal with vandals. User:BD2412/Archive - Miscellaneous everything else (thank you's, screw you's, my signature, jokes, comments, etc). I archive frequently - if you post a comment here, do not be surprised if it has been put away by the next day. I reserve the right to delete frivolous posts. My archiving is done primarly by the cut and paste method, although I occasionally archive long pages by page move. If you're looking for the edit history of a comment in my archives, it will likely be in the edit history of a page to which I moved a long archive. I'm nominating "Krka (disambig)" for deletion Please note: I am nominating Krka (disambig) for deletion. You are shown in the history as having edited this page. If you wish to object, check the details by clicking the link above. Regards, JohnI 18:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Category:Authors whose works are in the public domain I have nominated Category:Authors whose works are in the public domain, which you created, for deletion. You may want to comment at WP:CFD. Dr. Submillimeter 20:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC) As the debate is now over, I'm open to suggestions for a better way to organize the effort to alert users about works in the public domain. Cheers! bd2412 T 06:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Overprinted copyright notices on images If you have an opportunity, I would appreciate your input on this thorny IP law question. Dragons flight 10:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Addressed in the discussion. Cheers! bd2412 T 06:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Hey Just checking up on you old friend. Hope you're doing well. Prodego talk 03:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC) I'm fine. Tired. Overworked. Underappreciated. But fine. ;-) bd2412 T 06:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Tsk, tsk. Pessimistic too :) Pity I can't force you to take a vacation from work, and enjoy scenic <home region>. I am sure you deserve it BD. Prodego talk 19:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC) List of Fetishes? Are you still interesting in the article? Please let my know on my user page.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 04:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Kind of busy with other things at the moment. bd2412 T 06:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC) User:Stevenstone93 WP:AN/I is where the discussion is located. --Tractorkingsfan 07:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Thanks, I found it. Cheers! bd2412 T 07:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Look, I don't know you, and I'd like to stay away from this as I've recently had problems with arguments. But I'll say this: I don't understand this block. Sure, he was only editing his userspace, but blocking indefinitely? The only reason I could see was the allegation, brought up by User:Jreferee on WP:AN/I, that he was impersonating a real person. But I think if you look at the links that user provided as evidence, you won't be convinced that there is even such a person, and I have found no evidence of such a professor in real life. I think we're dealing with a young kid who is actually quite intelligent and could be a good contributor if taught, regardless the swift indef block is questionable. Maybe I have a COI as I have tried to help this user quite a bit with transitioning into being a good editor. In that sense I have failed, but a block is not the answer. Thanks for listening, --Tractorkingsfan 07:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC) It's not my block - I agree that it should be lifted, but just as you want User:Stevenstone93 to come to his own realization of what he needs to do to be a contributive editor, I want User:Ryulong to come to his own realization of why this block should be lifted. Cheers! bd2412 T 19:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Respectable indeed. --Tractorkingsfan 03:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Thanks BD2412 teaching me about Talk. For your archiving purposes, I am sending our dialogue. >I added passages on Richard D. Wyckoff and a link to a white paper the >James Forte wrote on Wyckoff that was published by the Market >Technicians Association of New York. > >I am new to wikipedia and just getting used to how to send messages, etc. >I did not know how else to respond to you, so I have send you this mail. >Is there a better way I should have responded? Thanks for the message, but you can respond by putting a note on my talk page (just click the big "T" after my name in my signature). You'll also want to put the pages you've worked on your watchlist by clicking the word "Watch" at the top of your page - that way you can see if anyone else edits (or vandalizes) those pages. Cheers! -BD2412 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jccoppola (talk • contribs) 14:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC). That's TREASON! HeHe, I'm well aware of the notorious "III/3/One" vandal. I remember standardizing the LTA page on him before it was deleted. 68.39.174.238 05:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC) BTW, thanx, of course, for the picture upload. 68.39.174.238 05:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Closely held companies Would you please use a little editorial talent and legal knowledge to properly include that accounting (and I would presume legal) term in the article company and then initialize closely held company to redirect the appropriate '#section'. Much appreciate it, and so will 007! <g>. // FrankB 02:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Hi! See Corporation#Closely held and public. (Note that a company can only be "closely held" if it is a corporate entity, as the term is an alternative to "publicly held"). Cheers! bd2412 T 02:44, 7 April 2007 (UTC) [1] Could you please do me a a favor? I started to contribute to Wikipedia using my own name. In retrospect that was I mistake. Could you please delete my talk page and any other pages associated with my account as is outlined in the right to vanish policy? Wikipedia is a great project and I wish you well. I created several good pages such as True Lover's knot, Boston Light, Sabbrage and World energy consumption and resources At this point will leave the project and count on others will carry the flame. Thank you for your help. Mierlo 20:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)