User talk:VCannella3: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:49, 15 April 2024

This is VCannella3's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benezet House has been accepted

Benezet House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I plan on continuing to add articles for the historic structures of Penn Center as long as they are approved. VCannella3 (talk) 13:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, and please do. Per WP:GEOFEAT, anything on an official register of historic buildings is presumed notable, which makes such drafts relatively easier to accept (assuming of course there is evidence of that status). Anything else would most likely need to satisfy the general notability standard WP:GNG. Happy editing! :) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gantt Cottage (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The NHRP listing is for Penn Center (Saint Helena Island, South Carolina) rather than Gantt Cottage and the cottage is already covered in that article, though you are welcome to expand it. In order for Gantt Cottage to warrant a stand-alone article, need in-depth coverage about specifically about it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gantt Cottage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VCannella3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi VCannella3, I am double checking my decline given another editor accepted a similar article above. I pinged you to the discussion but it's as User talk:DoubleGrazing#Benezet House. Feel free to join. S0091 (talk) 19:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, VCannella3!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 19:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Retreat House and Dock has been accepted

Retreat House and Dock, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gantt Cottage has been accepted

Gantt Cottage, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 13:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given another reviewer accepted another building, I resubmitted this draft on your behalf to accept it. S0091 (talk) 15:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hastings Gantt

I noticed the red link in Gantt Cottage so did some digging and found these sources you can use if you are inclined to create an article about him. Given Gantt was in the SC Legislature, he meets WP:NPOL so an easy pass. ^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]

References

^ Holt, Thomas (1979). Black Over White: Negro Political Leadership in South Carolina During Reconstruction. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0-252-00775-0.
^ Tindall, George Brown (2021-12-16). South Carolina Negroes, 1877-1900. Univ of South Carolina Press. ISBN 978-1-64336-300-4.
^ Burton, Orville Vernon; Cross, Wilbur (2014). Penn Center: A History Preserved. University of Georgia Press. ISBN 978-0-8203-2602-3.
^ Ochiai, Akiko (2004-03-30). Harvesting Freedom: African American Agrarianism in Civil War Era South Carolina. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-0-275-97935-5.
^ "The South and the Negro". Palladium-Item. 1907-10-06. p. 4. Retrieved 2024-04-12.

S0091 (talk) 17:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orchard Cottage (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

One source is a malformed link (perhaps appropriately archived somewhere). The other sources don't seem to address the structure described in the draft. If there is a NRHP entry for this structure, I will approve. Ping me on my talk page once fixes are undertaken.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orchard Cottage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 17:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pbritti see User talk:DoubleGrazing#Benezet House. It sounds like we have similar concerns but neither DG or I knew what's the "norm" so I defaulted to accept. S0091 (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for the heads up, @S0091: I'll reply there in a bit but I think that specific structure was probably individually notable enough. The other buildings might be worth merging to that article based on proximity of space and subject, but I'll dig deeper. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I worry about confusing this new editor who clearly is here in WP:AGF and unfortunately WP:WikiProject NRHP doesn't appear to be active. Yes, please do join the discussion after you have done digging. And apologies VCannella3. You have not done anything wrong and ask you bear with us. S0091 (talk) 18:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. VCannella3, this is a bureaucratic issue between other editors trying to do due diligence regarding some Wikipedia policy and does not reflect poorly on your contributions. Thank you for creating these drafts—we hope to have the matter sorted ASAP. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know what link appears to be malformed, as I would like to fix it. Here is the South Carolina's archive showing the national register of places, specifically within the Penn center Campus. http://www.nationalregister.sc.gov/beaufort/S10817707020/

Please let me know if this is helpful. I do agree that some of the buidings do not have much information, I actually have been working from the buildings with less information first and further drafts will be more complete, but I agree that perhaps combining some pages might be useful, but I'm not sure if they should be on the main Penn center page as that might too much information at once, please let me know your thoughts on how to approach that. Thank you VCannella3 (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will get back to you on this sometime over the next couple days. Apologies if I neglect this task, and please ping me on my talk page should Wednesday arrive and you don't see any further comment from me! ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti and VCannella3 what do think about a separate list article, similar to List of Washington & Jefferson College buildings? Of course that is a WP:Featured list; the one for Penn Center certainly does not need to be as extensive. Like that example, some buildings will have a stand-alone article some will not. VCannella3, see Washington & Jefferson College#Campus for how it is handled in the main article, which is to add a WP:hatnote to direct the reader to the list. S0091 (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Cannery (Penn Center) (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See my comment for Draft:Orchard Cottage. Consider merging the drafts as these appear to comprise the same historic district and may not be individually notable structures.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Cannery (Penn Center) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 17:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello VCannella3! Your additions to Draft:The Cannery (Penn Center) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please let me know what portion of the page has copyrighted information, I've been working with the Penn center as part of a academic project to improve their public facing material and so I am trying to take this very seriously. I would like to amend any issues, but please let me know what they are. VCannella3 (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Holt, Thomas (1979). Black Over White: Negro Political Leadership in South Carolina During Reconstruction. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0-252-00775-0.

[2] Tindall, George Brown (2021-12-16). South Carolina Negroes, 1877-1900. Univ of South Carolina Press. ISBN 978-1-64336-300-4.

[3] Burton, Orville Vernon; Cross, Wilbur (2014). Penn Center: A History Preserved. University of Georgia Press. ISBN 978-0-8203-2602-3.

[4] Ochiai, Akiko (2004-03-30). Harvesting Freedom: African American Agrarianism in Civil War Era South Carolina. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-0-275-97935-5.

[5] "The South and the Negro". Palladium-Item. 1907-10-06. p. 4. Retrieved 2024-04-12.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

@@ Line 202: / Line 202: @@
 *'''Copying and translation within Wikipedia:''' Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia]]. For translation, see [[Help:Translation#License requirements|Help:Translation § License requirements]].
 It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page.  Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copyright-new -->  — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 13:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
+:Hello, Please let me know what portion of the page has copyrighted information, I've been working with the Penn center as part of a academic project to improve their public facing material and so I am trying to take this very seriously. I would like to amend any issues, but please let me know what they are. [[User:VCannella3|VCannella3]] ([[User talk:VCannella3#top|talk]]) 14:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)