User talk:SlimVirgin/History 2: Difference between revisions
Nemesis1981 (talk | contribs) let's play nice shall we. |
|||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Attack_sites&curid=10503996&diff=122306526&oldid=122233442 Someone has broken out the 'rejected' tag]. - <font color="#0000C0">[[User:DennyColt|Denny]]</font> <sup><i>(<font color="#7A1616">[[User_talk:DennyColt|talk]]</font>)</i></sup> 20:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Attack_sites&curid=10503996&diff=122306526&oldid=122233442 Someone has broken out the 'rejected' tag]. - <font color="#0000C0">[[User:DennyColt|Denny]]</font> <sup><i>(<font color="#7A1616">[[User_talk:DennyColt|talk]]</font>)</i></sup> 20:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Excuse me, Maam == |
|||
Hi Slim, we seem to have another dispute. I just saw a list compiled by you, with my username on it. Now, while I do not deny I read LaRouche, I do not make a list of people suspected of being agents or associated with agents of anti-LaRouche people, as I could do. I believe that the evidence speaks for itself. Now, if I were a LaRouche member, I would make my point, admit my identity and as long as my point stayed available for all to see on the talk pages, I would be happy for telling the truth. I would appreciate knowing what you are playing at. If there is a charge to address, address it to me directly, or kindly take my username off the list. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:SlimVirgin/L&oldid=121760888] <--- said list --[[User:Nemesis1981|Nemesis1981]] 00:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:13, 13 April 2007
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Just a note![]() Good work
sub-page code?Do you know what the URL string is to display all sub pages under a given Wikipedia page? I remember seeing it once but can't remember now for the life of me. - Denny (talk) 18:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC) revertion of Wikipedia talk:VerifiabilityHello (I really love this discussion page - sorry for spoiling it). Since you reverted my modifications, you may now want to present your objections. Regards. Michelet-Me laisser un message 18:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
DisappointingSomeone has broken out the 'rejected' tag. - Denny (talk) 20:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC) Excuse me, MaamHi Slim, we seem to have another dispute. I just saw a list compiled by you, with my username on it. Now, while I do not deny I read LaRouche, I do not make a list of people suspected of being agents or associated with agents of anti-LaRouche people, as I could do. I believe that the evidence speaks for itself. Now, if I were a LaRouche member, I would make my point, admit my identity and as long as my point stayed available for all to see on the talk pages, I would be happy for telling the truth. I would appreciate knowing what you are playing at. If there is a charge to address, address it to me directly, or kindly take my username off the list. [1] <--- said list --Nemesis1981 00:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC) |