User talk:SlimVirgin/History 2: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 00:13, 13 April 2007

File:Animalibrí.gif

Talk archives

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
41

File:800px-PotbellySeahorse TNAquarium-cropped.jpg

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report

No RfXs since 00:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC).—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online}

Just a note

You do a good job.--**Dakota** 05:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

		The Society Barnstar
		Awarded for your nuanced and balanced dissemination of information regarding animal rights activism in human society. Specifically inspired by an superb re-write of the Animal Liberation Front article. Rockpocket 17:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sub-page code?

Do you know what the URL string is to display all sub pages under a given Wikipedia page? I remember seeing it once but can't remember now for the life of me. - Denny ^(talk) 18:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

revertion of Wikipedia talk:Verifiability

Hello (I really love this discussion page - sorry for spoiling it). Since you reverted my modifications, you may now want to present your objections. Regards. Michelet-Me laisser un message 18:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answered. [Hey, what do you claim to be? A SlimVirgin, or a PotbellySeahorse ? (LOL - oops. sorry)]. Michelet-Me laisser un message 20:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disappointing

Someone has broken out the 'rejected' tag. - Denny ^(talk) 20:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, Maam

Hi Slim, we seem to have another dispute. I just saw a list compiled by you, with my username on it. Now, while I do not deny I read LaRouche, I do not make a list of people suspected of being agents or associated with agents of anti-LaRouche people, as I could do. I believe that the evidence speaks for itself. Now, if I were a LaRouche member, I would make my point, admit my identity and as long as my point stayed available for all to see on the talk pages, I would be happy for telling the truth. I would appreciate knowing what you are playing at. If there is a charge to address, address it to me directly, or kindly take my username off the list. [1] <--- said list --Nemesis1981 00:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Attack_sites&curid=10503996&diff=122306526&oldid=122233442 Someone has broken out the 'rejected' tag]. - <font color="#0000C0">[[User:DennyColt|Denny]]</font> <sup><i>(<font color="#7A1616">[[User_talk:DennyColt|talk]]</font>)</i></sup> 20:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
+==Excuse me, Maam ==
+Hi Slim, we seem to have another dispute. I just saw a list compiled by you, with my username on it. Now, while I do not deny I read LaRouche, I do not make a list of people suspected of being agents or associated with agents of anti-LaRouche people, as I could do. I believe that the evidence speaks for itself. Now, if I were a LaRouche member, I would make my point, admit my identity and as long as my point stayed available for all to see on the talk pages, I would be happy for telling the truth. I would appreciate knowing what you are playing at. If there is a charge to address, address it to me directly, or kindly take my username off the list. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:SlimVirgin/L&oldid=121760888] <--- said list --[[User:Nemesis1981|Nemesis1981]] 00:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)