Jump to content

Talk:Sissy hypno: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 15: Line 15:
*'''Support''' This is a rare case where the common name is actually less offensive than the impressive-sounding academic name, not to mention being infinitely more likely to be searched for in the first place.[[User:Vizjim|Vizjim]] ([[User talk:Vizjim|talk]]) 14:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
*'''Support''' This is a rare case where the common name is actually less offensive than the impressive-sounding academic name, not to mention being infinitely more likely to be searched for in the first place.[[User:Vizjim|Vizjim]] ([[User talk:Vizjim|talk]]) 14:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' – While I'm not sufficiently familiar with the term to take a strong position, should we not consider the title [[Sissy hypnosis]]? Looking at the abstract for [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23268743.2021.1978312 Mackay & Mackay (2021)], they consistently use the term ''hypnosis'' outside of scare quotes. This would be in line with the article [[Erotic hypnosis]]. [[User:Graham11|Graham]] ([[User talk:Graham11|talk]]) 06:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' – While I'm not sufficiently familiar with the term to take a strong position, should we not consider the title [[Sissy hypnosis]]? Looking at the abstract for [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23268743.2021.1978312 Mackay & Mackay (2021)], they consistently use the term ''hypnosis'' outside of scare quotes. This would be in line with the article [[Erotic hypnosis]]. [[User:Graham11|Graham]] ([[User talk:Graham11|talk]]) 06:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
*:I would probably gravitate towards ''sissy hypnosis'' myself. (Don't take that out of context.) '''''[[User:LilianaUwU|<span style="font-family:default;color:#246BCE;">Liliana</span><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#FF1493;">UwU</span>]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:LilianaUwU|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/LilianaUwU|contributions]])</sup> 11:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
*:I would probably gravitate towards ''sissy hypno<s>sis</s>'' myself. (Don't take that out of context.) '''''[[User:LilianaUwU|<span style="font-family:default;color:#246BCE;">Liliana</span><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#FF1493;">UwU</span>]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:LilianaUwU|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/LilianaUwU|contributions]])</sup> 11:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
*::{{ping|Chaotic Enby|Skyshifter|Vizjim}} Would any of you object to the title '''[[Sissy hypnosis]]'''? [[User:Graham11|Graham]] ([[User talk:Graham11|talk]]) 19:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
*::{{ping|Chaotic Enby|Skyshifter|Vizjim}} Would any of you object to the title '''[[Sissy hypnosis]]'''? [[User:Graham11|Graham]] ([[User talk:Graham11|talk]]) 19:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
*:::It's fine with me! [[User:Chaotic Enby|<span style="color:#8a7500">Chaotıċ <span style="display:inline-flex;rotate:30deg;color:#9e5cb1">Enby</span></span>]] ([[User talk:Chaotic Enby|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Chaotic Enby|contribs]]) 19:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
*:::It's fine with me! [[User:Chaotic Enby|<span style="color:#8a7500">Chaotıċ <span style="display:inline-flex;rotate:30deg;color:#9e5cb1">Enby</span></span>]] ([[User talk:Chaotic Enby|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Chaotic Enby|contribs]]) 19:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:33, 21 May 2024

Requested move 8 May 2024

Autogynephilic persuasive pornographySissy hypno – Contested technical move. I believe "sissy hypno" is the WP:COMMONNAME by far. The sources in "further reading" all use "sissy hypno", and "autogynephilic" is something from Blanchard's transsexualism typology that has been appropriated by transphobes. Pinging Ahecht and Chaotic Enby as both were on WP:RM/TM. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Lightoil (talk) 16:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Relisting as suggested to generate clearer consensus. Lightoil (talk) 16:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section

Vizjim, I've removed your addition because I felt it gave undue weight to the viewpoint that gravitates towards "being trans is a fetish". It could belong in the article, but I'm not sure if giving it half of the article is appropriate. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 11:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think the exact opposite - the point of the section is that transphobes are weaponising their poor understanding of the phenomenon. The use of sissy hypno in "gender critical" activist circles is one of the reasons it's an important phenomenon. Vizjim (talk) 08:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]