Talk:Mahavishnu

Concluding Bhakti is superior to Yoga looks exaggerated

So bhakti (loving devotion) goes to Bhagavan, Krishna or Rama for instance (avatars or incarnations of Vishnu, Narayana). In this way, bhakti surpasses even yoga, which is aimed at the Supersoul, Paramatma.

The conclusion looks exaggerated and isn't obvious. It looks more like a propaganda view point.--Nckalyan (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

From what I have read of Bhaktis and Yogis, I always had the impression that Bhaktis were somewhat more powerful than Yogis. Is there a good source to read about the distinctions between the two? 50.72.32.218 (talk) 13:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Kemaro

Milan stop met racistisch zijn 145.102.241.198 (talk) 09:46, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Why you changed it. Read opinion

Srimad Bhagavatam didn't mention this this is not vedanta philosophy,Krishna is supreme and Balarama is first expansion, this is goswami of vrindavan gaudiya philosophy. Srimad Bhagavatam written by vyasa, are you read Srimad Bhagavatam, first read it and edit. Lol why you always changed my edited, I edited authentic information only not from bogus text like iskcon. 2409:4071:4DBD:495E:888E:D895:BD91:C8EC (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

What are you reverted that is wrong statement, there is no citation and proof, it is a iskcon, gaudiya Vaishnava philosophy, not for Mahavishnu, edit as neutral point for view, not for Vaishnavism, atleast add this statement in gaudiya Vaishnavism sub main. This statement belongs to Gaudiya philosophy of Bhagavatam, not main content. @Dāsānudāsa @Chronikhiles 2409:4071:4EC1:970F:0:0:6588:F610 (talk) 11:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

About edit.

so many propaganda for Vaishnavism and lord Vishnu.

This red tiger 🐅 is form Maharashtra, he is shaivism, that' why he hate Vaishnavs, add old for Vishnu wiki page, why there is so many statue of Vishnu in the world. And why you added shiva statue of Shiva for wiki page, why not added images. Lol What a hypocrisy,,

There is no children for Lord Vishnu, but you added devasena and sundarvalli as daughter, even none of the purana mentioned about it, it found only in Tamil tradition. Not necessary added this

And there is more son of Shiva , but you deleted when someone added children name, Goddess Ashoka Sundari and Goddesses Manasa is also daughter of Shiva, it information found in some purana, but you deleted as not mainstream,

What a hypocrisy ??

You believe in some tamil tradition information that God children, but you didnt believe what information found in puranas, that' not mainstream for you,

Fake information is good citations for you and original authentic source is not main stream. Very non sense for this very jealous on Vaishnavism.

There is old photo, same photo uses for Avatar article, Dashavatar article and Vaishnavism article, why not and also add to Vishnu Wiki page. Lol ..

And so many people jeaulous to Lord vishnu for eg in wiki, such as Dasanudasa and red tiger and all fake shiva Andha Bhaktas and so called fools and rascal.

And I personally thanks to @Chronikhiles Which have done lot of achievement for contribution to article such as Garuda dandakam and Om Namo Narayanaya mantra, I suggest to you and also create a page Narayana kavacha stotram and Namatraya astra mantra and related to Lord Vishnu and Vaishnavism. ed fools and rascals.

Dear @Redtigerxyz @Dāsānudāsa @Dougweller @Chariotrider555 2409:4071:4EC1:970F:0:0:6588:F610 (talk) 12:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)