Jump to content

Talk:Canada–India diplomatic row: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Restore: Reply
Line 14: Line 14:
I restored the article per [[WP:CCC]]. Besides, no discussion has taken place here on the article's talk page since it's creation. [[User:Mfarazbaig|Mfarazbaig]] ([[User talk:Mfarazbaig|talk]]) 16:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
I restored the article per [[WP:CCC]]. Besides, no discussion has taken place here on the article's talk page since it's creation. [[User:Mfarazbaig|Mfarazbaig]] ([[User talk:Mfarazbaig|talk]]) 16:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
*[[User:Mfarazbaig|Mfarazbaig]], what does "rea" mean? And I'm wondering if you actually looked at the close: "Later comments also pointed out this content is already appropriately covered on other pages", according to [[User:PARAKANYAA]]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
*[[User:Mfarazbaig|Mfarazbaig]], what does "rea" mean? And I'm wondering if you actually looked at the close: "Later comments also pointed out this content is already appropriately covered on other pages", according to [[User:PARAKANYAA]]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
*:"rea" was simply a typo error for the word 'revert'. FWIW, that discussion closed as '''No consensus''' and not 'Oppose'. I'm also wondering what other pages cover the '''Background''' and '''Reactions''' section for the '''Canada—India diplomatic row''' that numerous sources have covered and as such is notable enough to deserve a standalone article. Anyone who disagrees should take this article to the AfD or first seek a fresh and clear consensus for redirection. [[User:Mfarazbaig|Mfarazbaig]] ([[User talk:Mfarazbaig|talk]]) 16:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:57, 3 June 2024

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Excellently written article! Very strong sources, keep up the good work.

Noorullah (talk) 07:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restore

I restored the article per WP:CCC. Besides, no discussion has taken place here on the article's talk page since it's creation. Mfarazbaig (talk) 16:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mfarazbaig, what does "rea" mean? And I'm wondering if you actually looked at the close: "Later comments also pointed out this content is already appropriately covered on other pages", according to User:PARAKANYAA. Drmies (talk) 16:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "rea" was simply a typo error for the word 'revert'. FWIW, that discussion closed as No consensus and not 'Oppose'. I'm also wondering what other pages cover the Background and Reactions section for the Canada—India diplomatic row that numerous sources have covered and as such is notable enough to deserve a standalone article. Anyone who disagrees should take this article to the AfD or first seek a fresh and clear consensus for redirection. Mfarazbaig (talk) 16:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]