User talk:Rawn3012

January 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at 2020–2021 China–India skirmishes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — Czello ^(music) 21:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maharana Pratap’s reconquest of Mewar (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maharana Pratap’s reconquest of Mewar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GraziePrego (talk) 12:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Rawn3012! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GraziePrego (talk) 12:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Singoli. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Imperial^[AFCND] 05:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Mandalgarh and Banas, you may be blocked from editing. Imperial^[AFCND] 05:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Capture of Gagron (1444). Imperial^[AFCND] 05:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Provide me the source of capturing of 24 forts were captured along with gagraun. If you will not, the changes made by me will be applicable Rawn3012 (talk) 06:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

It's your responsibility to find sources, not ours. ''Flux55'' (talk) 06:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Nvm that. What I meant was that you should add RELIABLE sources to your edits ''Flux55'' (talk) 06:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Rc Majumdar in Vol 6 of A history and culture of Indian People

The course of this campaign is described in great detail by the Muslim histo¬ rians, but it is apparent from their accounts that Mahmud failed to conquer any part of the Maharana’s territory except Ajmer. As noted elsewhere, (p. 162) a verse from the Chitor KIrtistambha in¬ scription claims that Maharana Kumbha defeated the kings of Gujarat and Malwa. On this Sir Wolseley Haig remarks: “The more famous column of victory at Chitor is said to commemorate victories over Mahmud of Gujarat and Mahmud of Malwa. If this is so it, ‘like some tall bully lifts its head and lies’.”12 It is therefore necessary to quote Nizam-ud-dm’s version of the battle that took place as Mahmud, after conquering Ajmer, turned towards Mandalgarh: “Konbha also sent out his army from the fort dividing it into three detachments. The division, which confronted Taj Khan, and that which was opposed to ‘All Khan, fought with arrows and lances and there was a great battle; and a large number of Mahmud Shah’s troops were slain, while an innumerable host of Rajputs became

food for the sword . (At sunset) the two parties took up their

quarters in their respective stations. In the morning the amirs and vazirs collected in the royal pavilion, and submitted that as during that year the troops had been fighting repeated campaigns and the rainy season was near, it would be fitting and proper, if he would rest and repose for a few days in the capital city of Shadlabad, in order to repair the damage and injury to the army; and make after the rains, with a fully equipped army, a king-like attempt to cap¬ ture the fort. Sultan Mahmud returned and rested for some days.”.1? Rawn3012 (talk) 06:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Satish Chandra in Medival India from 1206 to 1526

"The Conflict with Sultans of Gujarat and Malwa occupied Kumbha throughout his life. During most of the time he had to contend with Rathors of Marwar too.Although sorely poccesd he was able to maintain his kingdom back. Kumbhalgarh was besiged sevral times by Sultan of Gujarat and Sultan of Malwa was able to raid as far as inland in Ajmer and other boder areas but Rana was able to repulse those attacks and retain most of his conquests exept Ranthambore' outlying areas"

Rawn3012 (talk) 06:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

I have given you the sources as it clearly mentions that Kumbha only lost ajmer and Ranthbore once and that too was recaptured Rawn3012 (talk) 06:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Well, you should probably put that in the article's talk page instead of here ''Flux55'' (talk) 06:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Flux55'' (talk) 06:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Imperial^[AFCND] 08:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring, as you did at Capture of Gagron (1444). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Aoidh (talk) 15:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mewar-Malwa Conflict has been accepted

Mewar-Malwa Conflict, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 12:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PadFoot2008 08:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of Mewar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kingdom and Padmavati. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding deletion discussion on Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27) article

Hi,

The article Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27) has been proposed for deletion .

You may participate in the deletion discussion of this article.

Regards.

Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)