Jump to content

User talk:Slj: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Gnome (Bot) (talk | contribs)
Bot: notifying User:Slj about removal of Image:Seven Sport.svg. Please see our non-free content policy
No edit summary
Line 49: Line 49:
== [[:Image:Seven Sport.svg]] ==
== [[:Image:Seven Sport.svg]] ==
Hello Slj, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]]. The image ([[:Image:Seven Sport.svg]]) was found at the following location: [[User:Slj/Seven Sport/]]. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the [[Creative Commons]] or [[GFDL]] license or released to the [[public domain]]. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. [[User:Gnome (Bot)]][[User talk:Gnome (Bot)|-talk]] 08:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Slj, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]]. The image ([[:Image:Seven Sport.svg]]) was found at the following location: [[User:Slj/Seven Sport/]]. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the [[Creative Commons]] or [[GFDL]] license or released to the [[public domain]]. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. [[User:Gnome (Bot)]][[User talk:Gnome (Bot)|-talk]] 08:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

May I ask why you reverted the edit concerning David Koch? Was there any material in that particular edit which you believe was inaccurate, and if so, may I ask what facts you possess which support your position?

Revision as of 05:55, 21 May 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Slj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Slj. Gonna help me with these ratings or not? DynaBlast 11:04, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Patwelsh.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Patwelsh.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have contributed to the article Wagga Wagga Marketplace. I am on a bit of a jaunt to improve shopping centre articles. Most of them do not show how the shopping centre in question is WP:Notable, ie why is this shopping centre different to any other shopping centre? Would wikipedia be worse off if this article did not exist but there was a generic article Shopping Centres in Australia which mentions that a shopping centre called the Wagga Wagga Marketplace exists. Could you please suggest something that could be added to the article to make it notable compared to all the other articles for shopping malls on Wikipedia? I ask this because I cannot see what makes one shopping centre notable compared to the one in the next suburb. Not every house has an article, why should every shopping centre? Thanks, I hope to implement some of your suggestions. I am happy to conduct a reasonable amount of web-based investigation to implement some of your thoughts. Or ideally, you could add some information to the article yourself, which shows how/why/when the Wagga Wagga Marketplace is notable. --Garrie 04:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I may have found your page based on your contributions or your link repair user box on your user page. If you are not a member, please consider including your name on the project page. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 23:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent SLJ edit

Hi Slj

Have researched your recent edit on "Rick Ardon" and there is no substantiation in your second line, derived from a "fun" newspaper headline or the copy that follows. Please be accurate for Wikipedia readers. Regards, Yobikol

contribs) 09:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:7 Adelaide.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:7 Adelaide.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Slj, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Seven Sport.svg) was found at the following location: User:Slj/Seven Sport/. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why you reverted the edit concerning David Koch? Was there any material in that particular edit which you believe was inaccurate, and if so, may I ask what facts you possess which support your position?