User talk:Dwrules

welcome to my talk page pls leave a msg after the tone.

(beep!)

Your comment on my talk page

Hi! You left a message on my talk page here, but I don't know what you mean. Perhaps it was meant for someone else? · AndonicO ^Talk 14:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

PLEEASSSSSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

{{helpme}}

What do you want help with?--Rambutan (talk) 17:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

thank god some1's here, i have seen 'spoiler' notes on doctor who episodes that have long since concluded but i have heard from some friends that it is a bit risky getting rid of them, do you know wether or not to delete them --Dwrules 18:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Where did you see them? I recently removed all spoiler tags from episodes prior to May, 2005, and didn't notice any being restored. I think allowing two years for the seasons to propagate worldwide and everybody to have an opportunity to see a broadcast or buy a DVD is rather generous, but I'd rather err on that side for the time being. --Tony Sidaway 18:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

could of swore there was 1 on the 5 doctors! oh well, thanks for helping! --Dwrules 18:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Copycat

Youv'e copied every single one of my userboxes, and diverted it into your own way! Even the "Good Article" Userbox! COPYCAT! User:Izzy259 20:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

• And do bear in mind that Wikipedia feels strongly about copyright, and you only copyrighted my userboxes to have some, but it's clear you're just a copycat because you never even edited X-Terminator or CBeebies, never mind promoting it to good status. HANG YOUR HEAD IN SHAME! User:Izzy25910:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• And even more proof, on the Christianity userbox, you can click on the picture and see who has used the picture including inside userboxes. I was near the end, but you were right at the bottom, meaning you copied it. What ya gonna do now? User:Izzy25910:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• And even more, you have all the userboxes I and some others have, but they were all on my page, and you don't have one userbox that I don't have, meaning you copyrighted me only so far. You think you're up for administrator? Izzy259 10:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Time for more proof! On the "Can't Wait For Movie" userbox, you said you couldn't wait for Mr. Bean's Holiday, but when you copied my userbox about it, Mr. Bean's Holiday had stopped being shown! Izzy259 16:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• You asking for more? Well, when you copied my Mario Kart DS userbox, we had the exact same friend codes. That proves you have never played Mario Kart DS online and it is likely you have never played it at all.
• PROOF! All of "your" userboxes are in the same order as mine! Well, Well, Well... Some Guy (Izzy259) 14:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

hang on a minute, is this the same izzy259 that i warned for putting fake 'practical joke' notices for messages and free cash on their user page, the same izzy259 that i later deleted the notices from, the same izzy259 who is a 'christian', think about that next time! --click here 11:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes it was the same Izzy259. Izzy259 14:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

RfA

Hi, I'm not sure what you were trying to do with your adminship request here, but it's not really allowed. It has failed, and you need to respect that, not fraudulently try to restart it. It failed because you've never edited properly, and are very new.--Rambutan (talk) 12:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Also, you're not allowed to do nasty things to others' userpages - you're just picking on Izzy because he complained about your userpage. You can't issue warnings to other users for things like that, and you were trying to pretend that you had the authority to ("this must stop..."). You must stop.--Rambutan (talk) 12:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

No, I won't accept, because I don't know what you're up to.--Rambutan (talk) 16:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rambutan

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rambutan, by Rambutan, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rambutan fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

I'm the one being nominated, and I'm not accepting. The user nominating me is up to something; see his talkpage, my talkpage and his RfA for details. Please leave me a message if there's a problem.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rambutan, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rambutan itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar + comments

Just to let you know that I've reverted your recent edits to my talkpage, since provoking those who have been subject to discipline is a violation of policy.--Rambutan (talk) 15:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 24	11 June 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor
Privacy report lists Wikipedia among best sites, but needing improvement	Board candidacies open, elections planned
WikiWorld comic: "Why did Mike the Headless Chicken cross the road?"	News and notes: Ontario error, no consensus RFA, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Fan-cr*p

Hi, I’ve made a proposal here, about fan-cr*p on Doctor Who articles in the wake of a broadcast. Any opinions?--Rambutan (talk) 16:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 25	18 June 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor
Wikipedia critic's article merged	Board election series: Election information
Admin account apparently compromised, blocked	Controversial RfA withdrawn, bureaucrats fail to clarify consensus
WikiWorld comic: "They Might Be Giants"	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

This account has been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet; see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dwrules for evidence. --Akhilleus (talk) 03:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 26	25 June 2007	About the Signpost

Board election series: An interview with the candidates	RfA receives attention, open proxies policy reviewed
WikiWorld comic: "Thagomizer"	News and notes: Logo error, Norwegian chapter, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 27	2 July 2007	About the Signpost

IP unwittingly predicts murder of wrestler: "Awful coincidence"	Board election series: Elections open
German chapter relaunches website, arranges government support	WikiWorld comic: "Cashew"
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

UNBLOCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dwrules (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

why??? i have never heard of the claxson duo before, i came from france so it caught my attention, i was impressed with rambutans work against all these hooligans but blocking me is a bit extreme!--click here 12:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are at the very least, a sockpuppet of the banned user User:Secfrance as proved by [1] and [2]. --  Netsnipe  ►  03:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may not post mroe than one {{unblock}}.--<big>User:Keycard 12:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)