Talk:Man'yōshū: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:27, 1 August 2007

Japan B‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 12:37, November 12, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Move to Man'yōshū

I would like to move this page to Man'yōshū. Are there any objections? Bendono 04:26, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me Nik42 05:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a few days and there has not been any objections. Page moved. Bendono 06:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Manyōshū (no apostrophe)

wp:mos-ja: "Article titles should omit apostrophes after syllabic n."

According to the mos, the article is nder the wrong name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhialto (talk • contribs)

That needs to be updated. See this discussion for details. Bendono 11:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Footnotes" or "Notes"?

Conventionally, I've observed a pattern in which "Notes" appear before "References." Here the order is "References" and then "Footnotes."

I started to change it, but then thought twice. It doesn't really matter ... or does it?

I've been making notes accessible using this format/pattern:

==Notes==

{{reflist

}}

The notes here are captured using this format/pattern:

==Footnotes==

{{cite web

| title = Online edition of the Man'yōshū

| url = http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/japanese/manyoshu/index.html

| publisher = University of Virginia Library :Japanese Text Initiative

| accessdate = 2006-07-10

}}

At my current level of Wikipedia expertise, I'm entirely happy to leave these kinds of issues up to someone else. But maybe that's exactly the wrong approach. I wonder ...? Ooperhoofd 17:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to switch the order of References and Footnotes. It makes more sense to have Footnotes first. In general, be bold and make edits as you feel appropriate. If others disagree, they can discuss it at that time. Bendono 01:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most highly revered?

Are there any cites to suggest that Manyoshu has ever been revered above the Kokin Wakashu?

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 ::Feel free to switch the order of References and Footnotes. It makes more sense to have Footnotes first. In general, be [[WP:BOLD|bold]] and make edits as you feel appropriate. If others disagree, they can discuss it at that time. [[User:Bendono|Bendono]] 01:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
+==Most highly revered?==
+Are there any cites to suggest that Manyoshu has ever been revered above the Kokin Wakashu?