Talk:Jay Barbree: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:17, 16 September 2007

A fact from Jay Barbree appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 September 2007. A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/September.

Wikipedia

Articles for creation B‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Jay Barbree has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: No date specified. To provide a date use: {{GA|insert date in any format here}}. (Reviewed version).

Good Article nomination

I have placed this on WP:GAC for GA review. ~*Crosses fingers*~ ^Ariel♥Gold 16:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail:

Passed. Congrats, and keep up the good work! --Ag ü eybaná 17:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woo hoo! Thank you Agüeybaná, for reviewing this so quickly and for the most excellent assistance! ^Ariel♥Gold 17:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 |needs-photo=
 }}
+{{GA|oldid=158309734|topic=Miscellaneous}}
-{{GAnominee|2007-09-16}}
 ==Good Article nomination==
 I have placed this on [[WP:GAC]] for GA review. ~*Crosses fingers*~ <sup>[[user:ArielGold|<font color="CC66FF">'''Ariel'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/ArielGold|<font color="FF69B4">♥</font>]][[User_talk:ArielGold|<font color="0066CC">'''Gold'''</font>]]</sup> 16:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)