User talk:Tiptoety: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:06, 28 October 2007

This is Tiptoety's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

vn-25

This user talk page has been vandalized 25 times.

Wikimood

[purge]	[edit]

Rex Goliath

Why does this article keep getting tagged as blatant advertising? I have read the guidelines and the links provided are verifiable secondary sources. I have no affiliation with Rex Goliath, I simply want to expand wikipedia's offerings of information about beverages.

wtf. Now its gone. Could i at least get my template back?

Thats fine, I'll send it back to the drawing board and try to gather more info. Thanks for your speedy response.

Great, if you have time I will run it by you for a quick review. Thanks again for your help.

Tourism In Quebec

Hi, I just started this page 5 minutes ago... Give me some time to put informations in it please. Bonjour_Quebec

Jean Lafitte

You auto-reverted a number edits to this article claiming I was committing vandalism. I believe my rewrites correct a number of grammar and other issues. Please compare with the version before the changes. Am I still a Wikipedia pariah, or can I get unwarned now?

Got a note from you

a cmpany keeps putting up there self promtoion on the page. i pulled it down. Passage events keeps promoting themselves —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.138.128.188 (talk) 04:00, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

ITV Play Westcountry

I deleted the article because it was completely made up. There is not one word of truth in it. It is, to be blunt, a fictional article. I have now replaced it with a redirect to ITV Play's entry, which will hopefully stop whichever troll started it from recreating it. RobinCarmody, 05:00 BST, August 21, 2007 —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 04:00, August 21, 2007 (UTC).

Deleting Content

I deleted the content and saved it by mistake. I have fully edited the content now for the article on Subramaniam Pillai. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdx-77 (talk • contribs) 22:07, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

I deleted the contents on the LIU, CW Post site labeled "arguments" because 1. I have been to at least 50 wikipedia college and university sites which only state FACTS, not biased grudges/complaints/heresay, etc. Not a single one had an "arguments" section. If they are allowed, they should be placed on the discussion section. These items add no value to the Long Island University site, which is supposed to be informative, objective and based on fact. This is CLEARLY a person(s) personal grudge against the institution. 2. I have a grudge against NYIT and I (in the past, as I now adhere to wikipedia standards) used to add my "arguments" against the school on their wiki site and they were constantly taken down as they were based on my experiences and personal biases and NOT on solid FACT. If my "arguments" were not allowed, neither should the ones on the LIU, CW Post site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.35.249 (talk) 23:16, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

I deleted the references because they were bogus, and to use them in an "encyclopedia" is ridiculous. Even a wiki drone, such as yourself, has the ability to actually read the references. Go check them instead of performing an IMMEDIATE REVERSION of what I did. 66.91.214.29 04:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tip

The author of the article I edited is a close friend of mine.... He is an outstanding writer in Spanish and Knowing the Ballet and him well I took on the edit.. This is the number 4 classical ballet in the world. Ms. Alonso is a personal friend of mine as well.. I am sorry about the summery.. I have no idea how to do that..... LOL Frankly, this is a one time deal for me in all probability.... If you could somehow fix it I would be grateful, as would my friend Migual Cabrera.

Cheers, Sr.Pastel de Manzana

Collaboration of the Week

Howdy doody ya’ll WPOR poke, time for more COTW. Thanks for the work on Portland Police Bureau and improving the references at Oregon. This week we are back to Stubs with Eastern Oregon and Fort Vancouver National Historic Site. Both need just a little TLC to make it to Start. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Aboutmovies 01:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sar123.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sar123.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done Tiptoety 04:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ep1002oregonstatepolice.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ep1002oregonstatepolice.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Tiptoety 15:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Vandalism Efforts

From my own talk page:

I would like to let you know that you are doing a very good job with your anti-vandal efforts, you have not been here long and already left an impression. Ever consider using WP:VP? Tiptoety 18:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you really mean WP:VP, or did that have to be WP:VPRF? Regardless, both are usefull links, that i will certainly read top to bottom. Also, thanks a lot for your compliment. Im glad that im being usefull around here :) --Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 18:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oops. My bad, yes i meant WP:VPRF, but WP:VP is a good page to read up on as well. And you are welcome, keep up the good work! Tiptoety

Editor Review

Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor review/Tiptoety, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Tiptoety 20:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 I deleted the contents on the LIU, CW Post site labeled "arguments" because 1. I have been to at least 50 wikipedia college and university sites which only state FACTS, not biased grudges/complaints/heresay, etc. Not a single one had an "arguments" section. If they are allowed, they should be placed on the discussion section. These items add no value to the Long Island University site, which is supposed to be informative, objective and based on fact. This is CLEARLY a person(s) personal grudge against the institution. 2. I have a grudge against NYIT and I (in the past, as I now adhere to wikipedia standards) used to add my "arguments" against the school on their wiki site and they were constantly taken down as they were based on my experiences and personal biases and NOT on solid FACT. If my "arguments" were not allowed, neither should the ones on the LIU, CW Post site.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.189.35.249|24.189.35.249]] ([[User talk:24.189.35.249|talk]]) 23:16, August 29, 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+I deleted the references because they were bogus, and to use them in an "encyclopedia" is ridiculous.  Even a wiki drone, such as yourself, has the ability to actually read the references.  Go check them instead of performing an IMMEDIATE REVERSION of what I did.  [[User:66.91.214.29|66.91.214.29]] 04:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 == Hi Tip ==