Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold edition: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 15: Line 15:


*'''Delete''' I don't see how the information contained herein is worth merging. Looks unverifiable to me, whether in the relm of video games or the general sense. -[[User:Verdatum|Verdatum]] ([[User talk:Verdatum|talk]]) 18:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' I don't see how the information contained herein is worth merging. Looks unverifiable to me, whether in the relm of video games or the general sense. -[[User:Verdatum|Verdatum]] ([[User talk:Verdatum|talk]]) 18:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' this is patently untrue. Only some gold editions have expansion packs. Some of them are just glossy packages with printed manuals instead of PDFs [[Special:Contributions/132.205.99.122|132.205.99.122]] ([[User talk:132.205.99.122|talk]]) 20:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:08, 12 December 2007

Gold edition

Gold edition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Although there are many "gold edition" packages out there, this is an non-notable concept that cannot be verified. In addition, this article also qualifies as advertising and is made entirely out of original research. Marlith T/C 05:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, I removed the most ad like paragraph of the article. Marlith T/C 05:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I don't see how the information contained herein is worth merging. Looks unverifiable to me, whether in the relm of video games or the general sense. -Verdatum (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this is patently untrue. Only some gold editions have expansion packs. Some of them are just glossy packages with printed manuals instead of PDFs 132.205.99.122 (talk) 20:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]