User talk:Scarian: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Yeah, you can remove it. I foudnm the reference to [[chav]] interesting. I did not know they had their own [[lingo]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 13:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC) |
Yeah, you can remove it. I foudnm the reference to [[chav]] interesting. I did not know they had their own [[lingo]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 13:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Vandalize == |
|||
I am not vandalizing. You don't even know what trivia or verifiable means, why do you continue vandalizing my edits??? --[[Special:Contributions/82.185.106.178|82.185.106.178]] ([[User talk:82.185.106.178|talk]]) 16:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC) |
I am not vandalizing. You don't even know what trivia or verifiable means, why do you continue vandalizing my edits??? --[[Special:Contributions/82.185.106.178|82.185.106.178]] ([[User talk:82.185.106.178|talk]]) 16:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:28, 16 January 2008
Template:Archive box collapsible
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA - User:AlanH
That's fine. I just mostly wanted the quick-revert tool - any way I can use that w/o being an admin?
I will check out the pages you linked me to and will be sure to contact you about WP:COACH if I want to try to be an admin again. Thanks for the generous offer & kind advice. --AlanH (talk) 15:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Your NPWatcher application
Dear Scarian,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! Unfortunately, your application has been declined because you've made only a handful of CSD in December, and not many even earlier, and the denied request are, unfortunately, too many compared to the sum of your nominations. As such, I am uncomfortable in favourably processing your application. We will surely welcome an application in the future.
Snowolf How can I help? 21:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, and many thanks for reminding me of the backlog, I definitively forgot about it :) Good luck, Snowolf How can I help? 21:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Soxπed Ninety Three | tcdb 17:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
...for your support in my recently closed Request for Adminship. I am more than a bit stunned by the outcome, which appears to have finished at 146 supports, no opposes, and one abstention. I am particularly grateful to Keilana and Kingboyk for their recent encouragement, and most specifically to Pastordavid, for having seen fit to nominate me. I also want to make it very clear to everyone that I have no intentions of changing my name again, so the servers should be safe for a while.
In the event you ever believe that I would ever able to assist in the future, I would be honored if you were to contact me regarding the matter. I can't guarantee results, unfortunately, but I will do what I can. Thank you again.
By the way, I know the image isn't necessarily appropriate, but I am rather fond of it, and it at least reflects the degree of honor I feel at the result. And it's hard to go wrong with a Picture of the Year candidate.
Now, off to a few last tasks before starting work in earnest on the various templates I promised I'd work on.
John Carter (talk) 17:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Need a project?
Follow my lead actually Antandrus's but... y'know :D 156.34.142.110 (talk) 17:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just that one article. By my edit summary. An international subject should never have a national cat. A "nationalist" is trying to claim that article for his own country. It is clearly an international subject and should never be linked to any one particular country. Their are probably more pages like this one. This is the only one I am watchlisting. 156.34.142.110 (talk) 19:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
User name
Yeah, you can remove it. I foudnm the reference to chav interesting. I did not know they had their own lingo. Bearian (talk) 13:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Vandalize
I am not vandalizing. You don't even know what trivia or verifiable means, why do you continue vandalizing my edits??? --82.185.106.178 (talk) 16:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)