User talk:TreasuryTag: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 2d) to User talk:TreasuryTag/Archives/2008/Apr. |
→yep: new section |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Just for the record, that was my edit. For some reason the cookie didn't hold and I was logged off at the time. I feel your warning was a bit out of line. Please [[WP:Assume good faith]] before making such warnings. Thanks. Administrator [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] ([[User talk:23skidoo|talk]]) 15:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC) |
Just for the record, that was my edit. For some reason the cookie didn't hold and I was logged off at the time. I feel your warning was a bit out of line. Please [[WP:Assume good faith]] before making such warnings. Thanks. Administrator [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] ([[User talk:23skidoo|talk]]) 15:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
== yep == |
|||
Yea your darn right, I have 2 people chasing me all over wikipedia deleting anything I post for the FUN OF IT. |
|||
Im pretty sure thats what you kids do for fun to piss off new people. |
|||
Revision as of 12:03, 21 April 2008
|
TreasuryTag is currently, or is going to be, away from Wikipedia, between April 20 and June 16, 2008, and may not be able to respond immediately to queries. He may, however, edit a little unless he's using the splendid Wikibreak enforcer. |
User talk:TreasuryTag/Talkheader
Just to fix the formatting...
Old Sock Case
Hey Treasury Tag, any chance you could remove the discredited sockpuppet case against me from your watchlist? I feel as though it implies some kind of guilt on my part. It;s been 3 months.--Dr who1975 (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'd rather not, if it's all the same to you - I'd like to keep an eye on it in case anything happens in relation to it... it really doesn't imply guilt on your part, it closed in your favour!! —TreasuryTag—t—c 07:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- I really wish you trusted me. It seems like we've been through enough together at this point. Anyway... fine leave the thing up.--Dr who1975 (talk) 16:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Re:Bringbackthetylers
Yeah, on afterthought he deserves to be blocked. I think he's deleted some of his warnings, that's what confused me. ...... Dendodge.TalkHelp 14:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- I can't, you'll have to find an admin. I'm helping out around UAA and AIV ready for my next RfA, but I'm not an admin yet. ...... Dendodge.TalkHelp 14:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
While it wasn't vandalism per se, he does have a history of adding unsourced content—and a prior block on 1 April. Based on the warning on 17 April and the addition this morning, I blocked him for 5 days. —C.Fred (talk) 15:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Exactly! Bad faith, WP:BLP violation, etc. If you should see that user come back, give another reminder warning and let me know on my talk page. If I'm not around, or if you see similar patterns with other editors, I'd suggest reporting it at the administrator's incident noticeboard or the biographies of living persons noticeboard: noticeboards devoted to general incidents and issues involving biographies, respectively. —C.Fred (talk) 15:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Your warning re:Donna Noble
Just for the record, that was my edit. For some reason the cookie didn't hold and I was logged off at the time. I feel your warning was a bit out of line. Please WP:Assume good faith before making such warnings. Thanks. Administrator 23skidoo (talk) 15:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
yep
Yea your darn right, I have 2 people chasing me all over wikipedia deleting anything I post for the FUN OF IT. Im pretty sure thats what you kids do for fun to piss off new people.