Talk:Renée Fleming

somebody PLEASE add more information. I just don't have time. Maybe list the roles she's played and a short biography

Fact error: When I read http://www.evermore.com/azo/c_bios/floyd.php3 I see that Susannah was premiered before Fleming was born! "Floyd completed his opera Susannah , which first premiered at Florida State in 1955 and later at the New York City Opera in 1956." // 213.114.226.208 18:15, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

• According to the Biography from iClassics included on http://www.renee-fleming.com/ it was not the world premiere of Susannah that is being referred to, but the Lyric Opera of Chicago's first performances, as the article states. So there is no contradiction, only a phrasing that might lead to the misconception you've picked up. JGF Wilks 14:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Whistle Register

She sings in the whistle register doesn't she? I think I heard her singing Magical Flute thing.

Is it accurate to say she is a jazz singer?

I don't think so, she dabbles in jazz ala kiri te kanawa, but i think she is an opera singer still :) Gareth E Kegg 10:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't say she's currently a jazz singer, though I would have called her one before she really went into classical music. As for whistle register -- she has touched a high G in several performances and recordings (live and recorded Lucrezia Borgia, a recorded aria from Mozart's Sogno di Scipione), has recorded a sustained high e-natural (aria from Vespri siciliani / Vepres siciliennes), and has at least attempted it in live performances (she once planned on it and aborted it at the last moment, if my sources are correct). I don't think she currently sings above a high e-flat, or perhaps just high d (performances or recordings).

Replacing fair use image

I know that Wikipedia policy favours free images, even if the quality is inferior to fair use ones. However, I'm not sure where to draw the line. If we have a beautiful fair use one and a very respectable free one, of course we use the free one, but if we have a beautiful fair use one and an absolutely appalling free one, I suppose that we'd use the fair use one, assuming that there was a necessity to have a photo in the first place. Many articles can do without images if we can't get free ones.

Several weeks ago, one of my pupils attended a Renée Fleming concert in Germany, and took some photos of Renée on stage. She told me that I could upload them to Wikipedia, releasing them into the public domain. The quality is not good. I'd be interested to hear from people familiar with our image policy as to whether they think it's good enough. If this photo is really so awful as to make fair use more appropriate on this occasion, I'll meekly submit to having it deleted. The original fair use image is here; the free one taken by my pupil is here.

Comments, please? Musical Linguist 01:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

The "fair use" one lacks copyright holder information and would need to be deleted anyway. The new one needs clarification on whether it is GFDLed or in the public domain -- it cannot be both. Jkelly 01:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, the tagging is complicated. (No wonder people are constantly using wrong tags!) I very much doubt if the girl knows the difference between GFDL and public domain. I'm not even going to pretend that I'm completely familiar with it. I've looked briefly at this, and the main difference I see (correct me if I'm missing something) is that under GFDL, you retain the credit for your work. The girl told me that if the quality was good enough, Wikipedia could have it, and that she was happy to release it into the public domain, so that Wikipedia could use it. However, the {{PD}} template said not to use that one. I'm not sure if I can use {{PD-self}}, since I am not "the creator of this work" (the girl isn't a Wikipedia editor), and I can't use {{PD-user}} since she's not on Wikipedia. I could use {{PD-author}}, or should I use {{PD-because}}? Please advise. (I wouldn't mind e-mailing the girl's e-mail address to the Foundation with her consent, but would not want to post her name here.) Or is the whole thing too much trouble considering it's such a poor image anyway? Musical Linguist 02:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

{{PD-author}} would be the right choice. I don't think it is that bad a shot. Jkelly 04:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for your patience. I've fixed it now. The fair use one is still in the Crane School of Music article, and I'm sure it shouldn't be, as a picture of someone who studied there is not an essential part of that topic. I think I'll be bold and take it out. Watch out for the calls for my desysopping and the vandal templates on my talk page! Musical Linguist 09:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

You've done exactly the right thing. The image should also be listed for deletion as replaceable fair use (subst:rfu) or orphaned fair use (subst:orfud). ed g2s • talk 13:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Header needs rewrite

WP:Contemporary Music Member

The header is awful - why is her highest note listed in the first paragraph?? Grammar is equally questionable. I'll edit the worst bits out and try to make it a bit more informative. --Wolf m corcoran (talk) 02:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)