Jump to content

Tafsir-i Kabir: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


== Background ==
== Background ==
The first of the eleven volumes was published in 1940 by Zia ul Islam Press, [[Qadian]]. [[Mirza Basheerud Deen Mahmood Ahmad|Mirza Mahmood Ahmad]] was the second Head of the [[Ahmadiyya muslim community]], which is a modern islamic messianic movement. The author considered this commentary to be the next step ahead in Quranic studies. In the preface to the first volume, he writes that classical commentators like [[Ibn Kathir]], [[Zamakhshari]] and [[Abu Hayyan]] did a great service for the Quran, but they made a few fundamental mistakes: Namely, they included unreliable narrations from unsound sources in their comments and they relied too much on [[Jewish]] literature. The author also believed that the idea of [[Abrogation]] has been of great detriment to the authenticity of Divine nature of Quran. He also suggests throughout the commentary the vital importance of the order in which chapters were arranged in the present form. The contextual relationship of the text of the entire Quran and of each sura to the preceding Sura i.e. the themes of the Qur'an are connected and all chapters, verses and words are perfectly arranged.
The first of the 10 volumes was published in 1940 by Zia ul Islam Press, [[Qadian]]. [[Mirza Basheerud Deen Mahmood Ahmad|Mirza Mahmood Ahmad]] was the second Head of the [[Ahmadiyya muslim community]], which is a modern islamic messianic movement. The author considered this commentary to be the next step ahead in Quranic studies. In the preface to the first volume, he writes that classical commentators like [[Ibn Kathir]], [[Zamakhshari]] and [[Abu Hayyan]] did a great service for the Quran, but they made a few fundamental mistakes: Namely, they included unreliable narrations from unsound sources in their comments and they relied too much on [[Jewish]] literature. The author also believed that the idea of [[Abrogation]] has been of great detriment to the authenticity of Divine nature of Quran. He also suggests throughout the commentary the vital importance of the order in which chapters were arranged in the present form. The contextual relationship of the text of the entire Quran and of each sura to the preceding Sura i.e. the themes of the Qur'an are connected and all chapters, verses and words are perfectly arranged.
The writer has given much importance to this aspect in his commentary, which was a novel approach at the time of its publication.
The writer has given much importance to this aspect in his commentary, which was a novel approach at the time of its publication.



Revision as of 00:40, 9 June 2008

File:Tafseer Kabeer.jpg
Tafseer-e-Kabeer, volume:1

Tafseer-e-Kabeer (Urdu: تفسير کبير, tafsīr-e-kabīr, "The Extensive Commentary") is a 10 volume exegesis of the Quran containing the lectures, writings and notes on Quranic verses by Mirza Basheer-ud-Din Mahmood Ahmad and took over 20 years to compile. A significant part of the text, especially that of the later volumes was dictated by Mirza Mahmood Ahmad.

Background

The first of the 10 volumes was published in 1940 by Zia ul Islam Press, Qadian. Mirza Mahmood Ahmad was the second Head of the Ahmadiyya muslim community, which is a modern islamic messianic movement. The author considered this commentary to be the next step ahead in Quranic studies. In the preface to the first volume, he writes that classical commentators like Ibn Kathir, Zamakhshari and Abu Hayyan did a great service for the Quran, but they made a few fundamental mistakes: Namely, they included unreliable narrations from unsound sources in their comments and they relied too much on Jewish literature. The author also believed that the idea of Abrogation has been of great detriment to the authenticity of Divine nature of Quran. He also suggests throughout the commentary the vital importance of the order in which chapters were arranged in the present form. The contextual relationship of the text of the entire Quran and of each sura to the preceding Sura i.e. the themes of the Qur'an are connected and all chapters, verses and words are perfectly arranged. The writer has given much importance to this aspect in his commentary, which was a novel approach at the time of its publication.

Contents of the Commentary

Although the work is very detailed, it does not contain all chapters of the Quran.

  • Volume 1: Surah 1 and portion of Surah 2.

Features and Themes

The commentary is written in the style of an argument for Islam. Repeated references and comments are made on the works of famous orientalists like Theodor Nöldeke, William Muir and William Montgomery Watt. The author has frequently dismissed the views of these writers in favour of more linguistic approach towards understanding the meanings of Quran. As compared to other classical texts, this commentary seems to rely less on "Asbab al-nuzul" or reasons of revelation of verses. This approach greatly reduces the impact and validity of negative remarks and allegations made on the Quran by non-muslim theologians.

Each verse is explained separately in two sections. The fist section gives different translations of the words in the verse according to major classical Arabic lexicons along with their different uses derived from classical arabic prose and poetry. The second section contains detailed commentary.

A detailed bibliography of references and index are provided at the end of each volume.