User talk:Tiptoety: Difference between revisions
→Yasis: he's back |
|||
Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
Hello. Just wondering what the story was about the semi-protection on this article. I've asked on its talk page, because I can't quite see it from the history. Could you provide some insight? I don't like to ask for unprotection until I know why it was protected in the first place! [[Special:Contributions/79.66.90.252|79.66.90.252]] ([[User talk:79.66.90.252|talk]]) 10:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC) |
Hello. Just wondering what the story was about the semi-protection on this article. I've asked on its talk page, because I can't quite see it from the history. Could you provide some insight? I don't like to ask for unprotection until I know why it was protected in the first place! [[Special:Contributions/79.66.90.252|79.66.90.252]] ([[User talk:79.66.90.252|talk]]) 10:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
:It was protected a few days ago due to vandalism. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 12:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC) |
:It was protected a few days ago due to vandalism. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 12:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
::Well yes, but I was trying to go for more specifics, given that it didn't look like cycling IP vandalism or heavy IP vandalism at all as far as I could see. There's an answer at the talk page now though. Could just be that Wikipedia's changed a lot since I was last heavily involved; it's not how it would have been handled a year ago. Ah well :) [[Special:Contributions/79.66.90.252|79.66.90.252]] ([[User talk:79.66.90.252|talk]]) 14:20, 19 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:20, 19 July 2008
11:19 am, 16 August 2024 (PDT)
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Ronosen RCUHi Tiptoety, I noticed you moved the Ronosen RCU to 'Completed Requests', but I don't see any action taken on it. It was the second case filed for Ronosen, as I was adding User:Gayatrisavitr to the first Ronosen RCU that was completed by Alison. Maybe I filled this second one out wrong? Should I have put the new request at the bottom of the completed part? Or? Thanks, ~ priyanath talk 01:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Just an FYI, I left a note for User:Sam Korn,[1] as the checkuser in this case. It looks like we haven't seen the end of Ronosen yet, and I'm not sure what the next step should be. Thanks again, ~ priyanath talk 14:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
IRCIs your IRC working? KnightLago (talk) 01:49, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Tiptoety - here you moved the above request to the "completed" column. However, I'd actually just added a new request to it and relisted; is there something I should be doing with the old one (noinclude tags?) to prevent it from showing up in the transclusion? I'm not much for formatting things. Also, knock knock. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 06:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
RE: Shiny thing!Haha...Thanks. I'm glad it is going to be used, and I'm sure it will be an improvement to the previous process. - Rjd0060 (talk) 03:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
AccountzeroHe has announced his return on my talk page, if you're interested. Otherwise, I guess I could submit a sockpuppet report. Thanks. Rnb (talk) 03:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
RfA thank you
HiHi Tiptoety, can you help my friend? Please see here, I'm brazilian, forgive my English and thanks for the attention. OffsBlink (talk) 14:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC) Not sure...if this is allowed, but I received an email from User:Wrestlinglover requesting that I contact you since you were the admin that blocked him. He has stated his unblock requests and has been denied by two other admins. Not sure what the procedure is here, but I figured I'd honor his request and inquire about it anyway. Regards. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 17:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Can you remove "edit summary usage" from the template because it's a dead link and "edit count" already shows the edit summary usage. Thank You. Goodvac (talk) 20:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Summer Time in the COTWHello again to those of the WikiProject Oregon Clan. Time for another new edition of Collaboration of the Week. Last week there was some good improvements to William Clark and the legendary Oregon Bottle Bill, great job to those who helped out. This week, by request is the Owyhee Reservoir, which is short enough to easily conjure up a DYK. Then, also by request is a red link elimination drive on Oregon newspapers. Feel free to help out with either. Click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 20:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC) WP:RFPP - wrong reasonHi Tiptoety. I believe you have stated the wrong reason here for why you've rejected temporary protection. As far as I can tell, his article is not featured on the mainpage. D.M.N. (talk) 20:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Odd RFCUHas an answer. MBisanz talk 22:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Protection of Raw FootageAh, thank you! Honestly, I am very thankful that you dropped by because I didn't know what the rough average protection amount is for something such as what went on at that page. So I will definitely consider what you said. Thanks so much, Happyme22 (talk) 23:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Yasis evading his block again.Sorry to bother you but User:Yasis is using another IP (Special:Contributions/218.186.64.147) to resume adding his conspiracy website link to 1973 oil crisis. Thank you for your time. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 02:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
YasisSo I just want to check... Now that the sock case is closed, "if" Yasis & IPs comes back (I'm pretty sure he'll be back as soon as he can), where's the most appropriate board to post to? ANI, or a different place? NJGW (talk) 04:58, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
And he's back again, stalking me to Talk:Water memory, from IP Special:Contributions/218.186.65.34. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 13:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC) AfdsUser:Wikidas is placing number of AfD on many articles for no reasons. Can you look into the matter other wise people like you have discouraged use of Wikipedia. Bebrahmin (talk) 04:58, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
The IP thread you just marked as semi-protected, hasn't been. Just to expand on my view as expressed before; I don't think this should be protected for three reasons: the IP is dynamic, so will more than likely not be using that IP tomorrow, the blocked was of a limited length and not really worth doing a protection against and the vandalism seems to have ceased. Regards, Rudget (logs) 16:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Wal-MartIndef semi-prot, eh? Are you nuts? :-P Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Chirps•Clams•Chowder) 01:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
blockedHi Admins Tiptoety and Sandstein, I want to thank Tiptoety for affirming that my edits were non-vandalism. BTW, if possible could you please urge user:Thegreyanomaly to show me ASAP, in black and white, which "chunk of reference" were removed(not "move") by me. I would like to show you that user:Thegreyanomaly repeatedly made false accusations on me, here are the examples:
(He senselessly removed the citation I added[3] and made the above nonsense comment, I later showed and let him read the exact quote from M. Goldstein account[4], I never stop him from adding more text from the same book. For example, I clearly told him "I raise no question on your edits"[5])
After I urged him[7][8] to point it out what chunk/tonnes did he refer to, until this moment(19 July 2008) the user still shows no evidence/weblink/screenshot how I removed "tonnes of citations" Moreover, I can read even arrogant, and of course sophomoric, comment like this:
Is he/she discrminating anon users which are not CAL students? I am not sure On South Asia's talk page where this user failed to respond, I have repeatedly warned that all edits shall come with citation per WP:CITE [10], and further urged more editors to come to this messy South Asia. I have shown you above (or here) how this user removed other's citation while hypocritically accusing other editor(s) as vandals "per Wikipedia rules", now it is his/her turn to show me how I remove chunk of reference. I myself all along edit wikipedia per WP:CITE, WP:BOLD and WP:COOL. Please kindly review my case and provide assistance in my future edits on wikipedia articles including South Asia. Have a nice day! 219.73.86.234 (talk) 03:07, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Rollbacker thanksThank you for the rollbacker permission. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 04:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC) Hello. Just wondering what the story was about the semi-protection on this article. I've asked on its talk page, because I can't quite see it from the history. Could you provide some insight? I don't like to ask for unprotection until I know why it was protected in the first place! 79.66.90.252 (talk) 10:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
|