Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thun'da: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:57, 26 September 2008

Thun'da

This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Happy with a merge if a suitable target is found. Stifle (talk) 20:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insufficient notability. Reywas92^Talk 20:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete per nom and per WP:NOT#PLOT - undue weight given to primary source description of fiction. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:52, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thun'da is an important charcter in the history of comics, influencing many later characters like Kazar. Couple refs: [1] [2]. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 20:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Notability established by Peregrine Fisher. Matthew (talk) 19:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 12:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - quality not a reason to delete -character of comics and a film, and also as per Peregrine Fisher. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:55, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notability established by Peregrin Fisher's references. Which need to be added to the article, even if only as external links for now. —Quasirandom (talk) 15:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a comic character with their own series would usually be notable for that alone, and having a very notable creator as well as being the subject of a movie serial makes this notable by any reasonable standard. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A fictional character that appears both in his own comic book and is the subject of a full length movie is almost certainly notable, the more so here where the character was created by an artist exceptionally notable in his field, and portrayed by a major actor. That said, this article needs plenty of attention. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 22:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge per everyone, notable unoriginal research verified in reliable sources. Needs to exist in some capacity. Also per boilerplate nomination “rationales” across multiple AfDs.--63.3.1.1 (talk) 04:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *'''Keep''' a comic character with their own series would usually be notable for that alone, and having a very notable creator as well as being the subject of a movie serial makes this notable by any reasonable standard. [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 19:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' A fictional character that appears both in his own comic book and is the subject of a full length movie is almost certainly notable, the more so here where the character was created by an artist exceptionally notable in his field, and portrayed by a major actor. That said, this article needs plenty of attention. [[User:Xymmax|<b>Xymmax</b>]] [[User_talk:Xymmax|<small><sup>So let it be written</sup></small>]] [[Special:Contributions/Xymmax|<small><sub>So let it be done</sub></small>]] 22:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' or merge per everyone, notable unoriginal research verified in reliable sources.  Needs to exist in some capacity.  Also per boilerplate nomination “rationales” across multiple AfDs.--[[Special:Contributions/63.3.1.1|63.3.1.1]] ([[User talk:63.3.1.1|talk]]) 04:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)