Jump to content

User talk:SSJ 5: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
JJJ999 (talk | contribs)
2,202 edits
No edit summary
JJJ999 (talk | contribs)
2,202 edits
No edit summary
Line 456: Line 456:


==Proposed deletion/merging of DBZ characters is going on by stealth. I've gone to deletion review to ask about the legitimacy of the decisions. Feel free to come too here :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_September_27==
==Proposed deletion/merging of DBZ characters is going on by stealth. I've gone to deletion review to ask about the legitimacy of the decisions. Feel free to come too here :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_September_27==

==Collectonian and Lord S are AfD'ing an article from DBZ again==
They didn't even notify the talk page where consensus was just reached, this really is reprehensible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tien_Shinhan#Tien_Shinhan
[[User:JJJ999|JJJ999]] ([[User talk:JJJ999|talk]]) 07:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:07, 7 October 2008

please note

please note the discussion on the biased name for war in croatia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Croatian_War_of_Independence, which is proposed to be moved to its original title.

Amaterasu

Why do you keep reverting my edit on the Amaterasu entry?--JadziaLover 17:11, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat my question. Why do you keep reverting my edit on the Amaterasu entry? --JadziaLover 17:57, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vampires

Man, where do you get sources about "Serbian" vampire mythology in the 3rd century? a) Slavs, therefore Serbians, were not there yet at that time, so whatever myths mighe have been prevalent there at the time could not be Serbian. b) In any case, I'm interested in history of that area before 1000 CE So, I'd be grateful of what you can tell me and refer me to.

Vampires

Dude ,I don't have a clue how to use this User talk , but if you can see this: it was a typing mistake ,it actualy 6th centuary. Slovenians came to Balcan in 6 centuary ... But before that there are some drawings that are showing that Iliri and Trachani had Vampire legends. Is there anything you want to know?

So vampire legendry could be traced back to Illyrian beliefs? I'd not be surprised if the Etruscans had had them, when I see the Charon legendry and imagery they bequeathed on Rome. But as I said, anything is welcome, and I'll see if it's believable and credible. --Svartalf 02:08, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cell_with_Kuririn.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 09:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tiencha.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 01:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Yamcha.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 09:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BusterM.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lynd.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 02:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Grandad.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 20:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Images

I had to remove the tags off of Image:Yamcha1.jpg and Image:Yamcha.gif. In both cases you had them tagged as you being the creator of the work, but neither of which is applicable. The picture comes from gamespot and the picture was (most likely) drawn by Akira Toriyama. Beowulph 21:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that .... I didn't want to put them in article anyway ... I'm not very good at that licencing stuff. btw what means GFDL? SSJ 5 23:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL

Thanks for uploading Image:Pelinkovac 00.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Nivus(talk) 05:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:180.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:180.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Drekavac1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Drekavac1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Yamcha ssj-l.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yamcha ssj-l.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:12, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:SGKolosh Bread.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SGKolosh Bread.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -SCEhardT 22:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Zlogo th mb pivo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Zlogo th mb pivo.gif. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Yamcha GT.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yamcha GT.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Bscap0160.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bscap0160.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Peter Plogojowitz

I notice you suppressed my "probably" concerning the current location of Kisilova. I haven't found any sources able to locate the place with any precision, so how do you know so definitely that it IS in Serbia? For all we know, it might be in Hungary, Croatia, or even Romania... --Svartalf 23:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me ... I live in Serbia. It is very near Veliko Gradishte village. Might not be the same one, but there is a place named Kisilova there SSJ 5 23:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Прриятно ми е :)

хубаво е, че има хора като тебе, наистина. барабанисти и момчета, които се занимават с Wikipedia. не знам доколко разбираш това, което приказвам. аз съм Българин и самия не говоря сърбо-хърватски. бил съм в Хърватско и Сърбия точно два пъти подред в двете страни. смея да кажа, че не разбирам особено много, но съм инат и предпочитам да говоря на родния си език и сърбите или хърватите да говорят на родния си език, защото смятам, че имаме близки езици и мисля, че можем да се разбираме :))). аз обичам да се разбирам с хората. моите уважения към това, че се занимаваш с музика наистина. обичам музиката и смятам, че е прекрасно, че има хора като теб, които се занимават с нея.

Чавдар Painbearer 20:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Novi Sad

Pa ako se neko već bavi brojem stanovnika gradova u Srbiji onda valjda treba prvo da ima neko znanje o tome iz kojih izvora se mogu dobiti tačni podaci a iz kojih ne, kao i znanje o tome kada su bili popisi stanovništva. Lako je naći neki levi sajt sa ko zna kakvim podacima i tvrditi da su ti podaci tačni. Tvoje izmene sam vratio jer si zvanične brojke sa zadnjeg popisa iz 2002 zamenio nekim levim brojkama za koje si napisao da su sa nekog nepostojećeg popisa iz 2005. To što si naveo i link ka sajtu sa koga si uzeo podatke nije od značaja jer ti podaci imaju manju vrednost od onih sa popisa stanovništva. Popis stanovništva iz 2002 je statističkom metodologijom uradio Republički Zavod za Statistiku i do novog popisa iz 2012, ti podaci sa popisa 2002 su najtačniji. Poenta je da su samo ti podaci sa zvaničnog popisa urađeni statističkom metodologijom, a svi drugi podaci iz drugih izvora su samo nezvanične procene. Dakle, nemam ništa protiv da ti podaci budu navedeni kao nezvanišna procena, ali i u tom slučaju podatke treba navesti tačno, jer i na tom ("tvom") sajtu lepo piše da sam Novi Sad ima 228.681 stanovnika, a sa opštinskim područjem (grad Novi Sad) ima 333.895. PANONIAN (talk) 21:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mkdotr_bscap02.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Yamcha-18-x.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Yamcha-18-x.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Saibamen_grabs_Yamcha.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Saibamen_grabs_Yamcha.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Yamcha ssj-l.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Yamcha ssj-l.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —— pd_THOR | =/\= | 19:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:250px-Koljivo_from_wheat.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:250px-Koljivo_from_wheat.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Yamcha1a.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yamcha1a.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Im_drekavac.jpg

Ala ti pobrisase slike...

Sto se tice slike drekavca: ako vec poznajes coveka koji ju je radio, mogao bi da ga zamolis da je izbaci pod nekom slobodnom licencom (GFDL ili cc-by-sa), ako se i plasi da mu je neko ne mazne moze da licencira verziju u niskoj rezoluciji (tipa 320x256 piksela) sto je neupotrebljivo za stampu, a u zamenu mozemo da mu napravimo clanak o igri :) Nikola 23:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dobro, moram da pitam druga zato shto on kontaktira sa njim, a ne ja. Lik radi i za Faktor 4 i Divlju Magiju. SSJ 5 00:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Verat-net

You have recently re-created the article Verat-net, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. -WarthogDemon 01:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Robobatman16za.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Robobatman16za.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 04:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My friend cuted it from his comic ... At least he says so SSJ 5 01:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Veternik

U južnim dijalektima srpskog jezika neke reči se izgovaraju malo drugačije nego u standardnom srpskom. Pošto je Veternik kod Novog Sada nazvan prema planinskom vrhu Veternik, očigledno je da reč dolazi iz južnog dijalekta. I nisam čuo za reč veternica? Šta znači ona? PANONIAN (talk) 14:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, kapiram šta je veternica, ali mi se čini da i to ima veze sa reči "vetar" - jer žito prolazi kroz te rupe kao vetar. :) To ti je ista etimologija. PANONIAN (talk) 15:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pa ne vidim zašto bismo u članak dodavali reč samo zato što je slična ako ta reč nema nikakve direktne veze sa imenom Veternika. U literaturi lepo piše da je mesto Veternik dobilo ime po planinskom vrhu Veternik, dok u linku koji sam stavio u članak piše da ime tog vrha dolazi od reči vetar. Vikipedija treba da koristi izvore a ne da sada sami nagađamo od koje je reči moglo nastati. PANONIAN (talk) 20:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
== Image:Apsolutromant.jpg listed for deletion ==
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Apsolutromant.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —Pilotguy (ptt) 17:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Yamcha.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Yamcha.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alex58oz.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Alex58oz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:N38420.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:N38420.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bscap0001.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bscap0001.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Real Aikido

"Steven Seagal is a master of this martial art."

I am woking on a disambiguation for master. Do you mean he is Shihan? Or just really really good?--Knulclunk 05:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's just realy good SSJ 5 12:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonball Wiki

  • Hi there. I noticed you're a member of Wikiproject Dragonball, and I'm trying to recruit some people from that to contribute to the Dragon Ball Wiki. It's in terrible shape right now with pretty much no consistency or policies, and only this week have I been able to get Angela and Sannse to create some Forums for us over there. I've got a proposed Manual of Style going over there and would like some people to contribute to that to set up some policies and start making the wiki bigger, better, and more intelligible/consistent. If you're interested, please hop on over or talk to me. Thanks for the time, whether you're interested or not. Wildyoda 02:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I registered there. I'll be active ;) SSJ 5 12:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're the last person I'll probably mention this to: I was wondering if you good see this Yamcha Vs. Yamucha discussion and say what you think the article should remain titled. Thank you. By the way, what is your username on the DB wiki? Mine is Burdock. Yours? ~I'm anonymous

Non-free use disputed for Image:006111.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:006111.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drekavac

You may see full article used as the reference posted at [1]. Whether you have heard or not heard about the name or people believing in it in Vojvodina is not relevant - you are not an etnographer, and you can't claim something if there is no reference confirming it. Also, saying that belief was widespread means only that today it is not widespread - it is spread, but not wide. It could, of course, be mentioned that belief still exists. Nikola 20:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Molim te prichaj na srpskom nismo ameri, molim te .... Sledetje, navoditi forum kao referencu nije bash najbolje ... Ali ipak drek nisam nigde ni prochitao i bash sam se raspitao i kod prijatelja iz bosne i krusevca i niko nije chuo izraz drek niti da se ikad tako zvao. Ali ajde ako je ta knjiga stvarno pouzdan izvor .... SSJ 5 22:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:CaddyQuaidposter.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CaddyQuaidposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Novica Cerović

A tag has been placed on Novica Cerović, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Crunch13 17:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ban novica cerovic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ban novica cerovic.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Slaninari

A tag has been placed on Slaninari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Leon Sword 03:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Apsolutromant.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Apsolutromant.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 19:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yakon and Pui Pui in Tenkaichi 3

Hello, SSJ 5. I noticed you've been adding Yakon and Pui Pui to the Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 3 playable character list, claiming he's present in a trailer. Yakon is only an attack for Babidi, as seen in screenshots where he or Pui Pui are shown on the screen yet Babidi's face is shown next to the health bar. These two have also been shown to be attacks in videos where people have initiated Babidi's special attacks and Yakon or Pui Pui appeared for a brief moment.

Please refrain from adding these two in the future. Thank you, and happy editing! // DecaimientoPoético 16:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about not adding Pui Pui; that was just a careless mistake of mine. I reworded the comment accordingly. Now, just out of curiousity, where does the forum hint towards Yakon's appearance as a playable character? I'm a user on the forums (Szayel Aporro), assuming you're talking about AtariCommunity, but the only thing I've seen about Yakon and Pui Pui are petitions and polls on whether they should be playable or not. // DecaimientoPoético 17:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As far as i know there was a thread in which a guy claimed that he played BT3, and put up a list of playable characters, the admins did not react for a while.... I'll look it up but i think the thread is gone ... SSJ 5 00:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yup i think it was here ... http://www.ataricommunity.com/forums/showthread.php?t=597014 SSJ 5 00:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bscap038.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bscap038.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 04:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:006111.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:006111.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 22:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Povratak na Kosovo

Povratak na Kosovo, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Povratak na Kosovo satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Povratak na Kosovo and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Povratak na Kosovo during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 22:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Yamcha sokidan.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Yamcha sokidan.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bscap038.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bscap038.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:12, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dnevnik-naslovna.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dnevnik-naslovna.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logodnvnik.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Logodnvnik.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Teskojebitisam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Teskojebitisam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DB humans

Thanks for heads up. I have your back on this one. Thanos6 (talk) 05:33, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not canvass

As you did here. It is not good form. I (talk) 05:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Joker-mask.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Joker-mask.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tenshinhan, almost a good article?

Since we did a good job at making Yamucha pass WP:GAC, I was wondering if we could get the job done on Tenshinhan. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I was gonna do that but I couldn't find the time :D SSJ 5 (talk) 23:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, ok. Do you think you will be able to assist anytime soon? I have all of the volumes so I assume this wouldn't be too challenging. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I could start tomorrow. :D SSJ 5 (talk) 02:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can count on me...but bear in mind that S'maru and I have vastly differing requirements about what makes a good article. Thanos6 (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Long as we don't violate any rules and source most of the content, there shouldn't be any qualms. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok we shall start :D SSJ 5 (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dead End (band)

An editor has nominated Dead End (band), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead End (band) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vanhels2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vanhels2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for uploading Image:Yamucha FlyJ.PG.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for uploading Image:Yamucha Death.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Alhambra cool.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Alhambra cool.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tien GA?

Hey SSJ 5 , do you still have the info you were planing on adding to the Tien page? You can add it, and we can work together to re-phrase it. I would like to help make the article a GA , but I don't have too much info, and I'd need help. Also any suggestions on what to put in the "Reception" section, we need sources, and info about his reception which is hard to come by. That section is pretty empty as of now. - Prede (talk) 02:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей

Благодаря за добрите думи. Радвам се, че има хора, които разбират български. По принцип не са много българите тук. За себе си мога да кажа, че съм един от силно посветените в работата ми тук. Поздрави: The Mad Hatter (talk) 10:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Yamucha FlyJ.PG.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Yamucha FlyJ.PG.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Yamucha Death.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Yamucha Death.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion/merging of DBZ characters is going on by stealth. I've gone to deletion review to ask about the legitimacy of the decisions. Feel free to come too here :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_September_27

Collectonian and Lord S are AfD'ing an article from DBZ again

They didn't even notify the talk page where consensus was just reached, this really is reprehensible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tien_Shinhan#Tien_Shinhan JJJ999 (talk) 07:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SSJ_5&oldid=243603927"