Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names

Navigation: Archives • Instructions for closing administrators •

This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Wikipedia's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:

• Report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention.
• For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; blatant vandalism can also be reported at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, which is sometimes a better option.

Do NOT post here if:

• the user in question has made no recent edits.
• you wish to have the block of a user reviewed. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator (see also Wikipedia:Blocking policy § Unblocking).

Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:

• has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
• has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
• is not already blocked.

If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Wikipedia's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.

Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.

Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList

---

Reports

Please remember that this is not a vote, rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). Bolded recommendations are not necessary. There are no set time limits to the period of discussion.

Qwerspam

Qwerspam (talk · contribs)

Currently usernameblocked and requests unblock; see talk. Please review. As for me, I can't see how this username violates policy.  Sandstein  22:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

There's some discussion on the user's talk page, currently. I'm not sure if it's preferable to continue here or there; guess I'll go wherever the talking is or moves to. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I see no violation here, myself. Shereth 22:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

This is one of those borderline usernames that, to me, aggravates disruptive behavior but is not a problem if the user edits constructively. I'd be inclined to let it go. Daniel Case (talk) 00:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the username below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/User names). No further edits should be made to this section.

---

I am inclined to agree with Daniel - on the surface, there is a tinge of disruptive potential, but certainly not enough to warrant a block, and especially not if the user is acting in good faith. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 01:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Thaksin

No action per Thaksin Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 02:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I am an editor under the wikipedia username "Thaksin". However, there is comment on my username that is in repetitive with Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra, the former prime minister of Thailand. The comment also doubt whether my username is in conflict with the wikipedia's policy on username.

I may suggest that the word "Thaksin" is a common word in Thai language, which has 2 meanings. According to the Official Thai Dictonary of 1999 compiled by the Royal Institute of Thailand, the word can mean "the south direction" or "southern". The other meaning is "the right hand side." Nevertheless the word "Thaksin" is the first name of many Thai people; It is very common in Thailand to find a person with his first name of "Thaksin". The word "Thaksin" is also a prefix in Thai language: you can add Thaksin- in front of certian words to make new words.

Please notice that using the word "Thaksin" alone (without his surname) did not resemble such person. If there exist a wikipedia user under the name of "Shinawatra", such action actually resemble such person and also his family. I deny the doubt on the ground that I use the name with good faith, as you can see in my edit history (contribution page). There is no political conviction to be found there, you can found only economics contents however contained a little relatedness with politic and/or political situation in Thailand. No intention to defame nor exaggerate such person nor provoke misleading to anyone, as I edit only on economic issues.

I don't think that using of the name will result in the breach of the username policy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thaksin (talk • contribs) 19:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

I think this could be easily rectified if the user simply indicates on his/her userpage that they are not said real person - this should alleviate any concerns. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 21:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Given the above, I can't see this as being a "disruptive" username... It would be like User:Joe coming up because of Joe Biden. We wouldn't ask Joe to even add a statement of disambiguation to his page. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 00:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

No username concern. Thaksin is a word in Thai, and a given name. I can't imagine any reasonable confusion with the notable figure. Paranormal Skeptic's "Joe" example is a good analogy. --MCB (talk) 04:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Agree with Paranormal Skeptic and MCB, no need to change username. I don't think the user needs to indicate that he is not Thaksin Shinawatra, unless other users get confused. -kotra (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Agreed - if there is future confusion, then a disclaimer may be needed. At the moment, it's not necessary. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 13:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

I personally disagree that any disclaimer is needed. It is a very common Thai username , apparently, so I find any confusion very improbable. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 00:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

AD, I concede that it is a commonly used Thai name, however, this is the English language Wikipedia, and such distinctions aren't as obvious - which is why, I am assuming, this was brought up on the user's talk page to begin with. Nevertheless, unless there was growing concern, disclaimer completely unnecessary. In fact, I think this discussion could probably be closed : ) Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 01:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Clearly a common name in Thailand and therefore it's not disruptive. The idea that a disclaimer should be placed on the editor's userpage is overly fussy and unnecessary. X MarX the Spot (talk) 00:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy close as allow. We talked about this before. Thaksin. SYSS Mouse (talk) 01:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the entries talk page). No further edits should be made to this page.