User talk:Jackelfive: Difference between revisions
Jackelfive (talk | contribs) reply |
|||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
Can you explain why a legitimate link to an external source has been removed? The information is far from 'unconstructive' and my comments in the 'talk page' have also been rolled back... [[User:Solutioneering|Solutioneering]] ([[User talk:Solutioneering|talk]]) 07:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
Can you explain why a legitimate link to an external source has been removed? The information is far from 'unconstructive' and my comments in the 'talk page' have also been rolled back... [[User:Solutioneering|Solutioneering]] ([[User talk:Solutioneering|talk]]) 07:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
:I'm sorry it must have been an accident. I have undone my reversion. Thanks for letting me know. [[User:Jackelfive|jackelfive]] ([[User talk:Jackelfive#top|talk]]) 07:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
:I'm sorry it must have been an accident. I have undone my reversion. Thanks for letting me know. [[User:Jackelfive|jackelfive]] ([[User talk:Jackelfive#top|talk]]) 07:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Many thanks... [[User:Solutioneering|Solutioneering]] ([[User talk:Solutioneering|talk]]) 07:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== re Andrew Sullivan == |
== re Andrew Sullivan == |
Revision as of 07:43, 29 October 2008
|
License tagging for Image:Falcon FG.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Falcon FG.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Jackelfive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Longhair\talk 10:04, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hi, and welcome to the Aviation WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPAVIATION Announcements}} there.
- Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, and project-wide collaboration.
- We have a number of child projects and task forces that focus on specific topics and aircraft types.
- We're developing a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the experienced project members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 17:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Alexandra Hamilton, Duchess of Abercorn has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Prince of Canada t | c 07:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. DiverseMentality(Boo!) 06:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page!jackelfive (talk) 06:39, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
FYI
Hiya, thanks for your help with the vandals. :) Just as an FYI though, users (even anons) are allowed to blank templates and block messages from their talkpages. See WP:BLANKING. So if I put a block message on a page and somebody deletes it, I don't really mind. They're still blocked, and if by blanking their talkpage, it de-escalates the situation, that's fine. Now, if they were blanking an unblock template so they could try multiple unblocks, that's a different story. But just blanking block messages or other warnings? Nah, it's okay. :) Anyway, keep up the great work, --Elonka 05:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
Hi - I've fulfilled your request for rollback. Please remember to use it only for the removal of obvious vandalism. You can find out more at WP:RBK or ask me for any help. Thanks for your hard work. Pedro : Chat 08:49, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM?
On what basis are you rolling back changes because YOU find them "unconstructive"?
Who the hell died and made YOU god of all WIKI creation?
If someone makes a change which is in a TRIVIA section which identifies TRIVIA about the thing in question where do you get off eliminating them without any discussion of the matter? Tinpot dictator with delusions of godhood. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.219.28 (talk) 12:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- If you find that something I reverted shouldn't have been, please notify me. As for the warning message, it is auto-generated and automatically added with the reversion. jackelfive (talk) 04:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Can you explain why a legitimate link to an external source has been removed? The information is far from 'unconstructive' and my comments in the 'talk page' have also been rolled back... Solutioneering (talk) 07:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry it must have been an accident. I have undone my reversion. Thanks for letting me know. jackelfive (talk) 07:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Many thanks... Solutioneering (talk) 07:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
re Andrew Sullivan
Look at the edit and edit summary again; you're making a mistake.71.240.67.58 (talk) 06:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Your edit was reverted because it was removal of sourced content. jackelfive (talk) 06:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)