Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia style and naming: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:56, 25 November 2008

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) Three important proposals for changing MOSNUM with respect to (1) the linking of date formats, (2) date autoformatting, and (3) requirements for auto changes.
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision What sources are considered reliable sources for Eurovision articles, in particular is the ESCKaz website a reliable source?
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style Should WP:MOS be prescriptive, or should it be a guideline, as defined in WP:POL?
Talk:Felony disenfranchisement Disagreement over style

v t e Requests for comment (All)
Articles (All)	Biographies (bio) Economy, trade, and companies (econ) History and geography (hist) Language and linguistics (lang) Maths, science, and technology (sci) Media, the arts, and architecture (media) Politics, government, and law (pol) Religion and philosophy (reli) Society, sports, and culture (soc)
Non-articles (All)	Wikipedia style and naming (style) Wikipedia policies and guidelines (policy) WikiProjects and collaborations (proj) Wikipedia technical issues and templates (tech) Wikipedia proposals (prop) Unsorted
Instructions	To add a discussion to this list: Add the tag `{{rfc\|xxx}}` at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, `{{rfc\|xxx\|yyy}}`, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
For more information, see Wikipedia:Requests for comment. Report problems to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:'''
-* <strong>[[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#RfC:_Three_proposals_for_change_to_MOSNUM|Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)]]</strong> Three important proposals for changing MOSNUM with respect to (1) the linking of date formats, (2) date autoformatting, and (3) requirements for auto changes **Objection, as there is a dispute as to the status quo the RfC is to change.
+* <strong>[[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#RfC:_Three_proposals_for_change_to_MOSNUM|Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)]]</strong> Three important proposals for changing MOSNUM with respect to (1) the linking of date formats, (2) date autoformatting, and (3) requirements for auto changes.
 * <strong>[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#RfC_on_ESCKaz_reliability|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision]]</strong> What sources are considered reliable sources for Eurovision articles, in particular is the ESCKaz website a reliable source?
 * <strong>[[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#What_is_WP:MOS?|Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style]]</strong> Should [[WP:MOS]] be prescriptive, or should it be a guideline, as defined in [[WP:POL]]?