Talk:Amman: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:02, 24 December 2008

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Template:WP1.0

Arab world Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cities Start‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Jordan Start‑class Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jordan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jordan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JordanWikipedia:WikiProject JordanTemplate:WikiProject JordanJordan articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks YOU can help with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Greek

The Greek spelling Φιλαδελφια was given, but I've temporarily removed it. This is because I really think the spelling was Φιλαδελφεια, but can't quite confirm that.

History

My sources claim that the Circassians settled in the area in AD 1878 rather than AD 1887. Can someone please confirm or deny this? - Cybjorg 16:13, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ammanscape.jpg

This photo got a caption saying "Jabal Abdoun" but Abdoun is a place which is in the Jabal Amman area. -- Omernos 05:59, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I took this image. I changed the caption to just Abdoun if that makes more sense. When I lived in Amman, I used to know this part of town as Jabal Abdoun, I don't think it was its formal name though. It's interesting that Abdoun is classified as being part of Jabal Amman, as Abdoun stands on its own hill, and is separated from Jabal Amman by a deep wadi. Nick Fraser 06:32, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nick, it's a great photo. I am from Jordan and I loved this photo. I wanted a proper caption to it! :D -- Well, yeah people often think Abdoun is a whole different place or on it's own but it's actually part of Jabal Amman. Jabal Amman is such a great place, very nice and classy! And it views almost the oldest heritage or Amman and Royalty! -- Omernos

While it is correct that Abdoun is contained within the neighbourhood of Jabal Amman, Jabal Abdoun is indeed a hill separate from that of Jabal Amman. Jamshyd 02:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism

I can't change the tourism section, it is vandalized

"lone, deranged"?

seems to be a little editorialistic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.215.216.32 (talk) 17:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 {{WPCities|class=Start|importance=Top}}
 {{WikiProject Jordan|class=start|importance=top}}
+==Greek==
 The Greek spelling '''&#934;&#953;&#955;&#945;&#948;&#949;&#955;&#966;&#953;&#945;''' was given, but I've temporarily removed it.  This is because I really think the spelling was &#934;&#953;&#955;&#945;&#948;&#949;&#955;&#966;&#949;&#953;&#945;, but can't quite confirm that.