User talk:Redvers: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 10:25, 28 January 2009

Redvers is

male •

gay •

married •

a socialist •

a vegetarian •

Welsh •

an atheist • and I thank you with all of my heart

`01`	`02`	`03`	`04`	`05`	`06`	`07`	`08`	`09`	`10`
`11`	`12`	`13`	`14`	`15`	`16`	`17`	`18`	`19`	`20`
`21`	`22`	`23`	`24`	`25`	`26`	`27`	`28`	`29`	`30`
`31`	`32`	`33`	`34`	`35`	`36`	`37`	`38`	`39`	`40`
`41`	`42`	`43`	`44`	`45`	`46`	`47`	`48`	`49`	`50`

		Don't post your images to Commons. Why not?
		DON'T post "talkback" templates. I'm already watchlisting your talk page
		Watchlist this page to see replies

Krippled crak monkeys

Recreated I'm afraid, seems to be by a vandalism only account. Thanks. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 14:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked by someone else for 55 hours; article redeleted and I've salted it. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 15:21, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob D. Hyden 19, JAN

May I ask why you deleted my chapters summary for Redcoats and Rebels?

You'll need to give me a clue, as psychic powers are only handed out to every third admin. Who are you and what article are you talking about (provide links or diffs). ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 08:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redcoats and Rebels: The American Revolution through British Eyes, Chapter Summary, 12:38, 19 January 2009 Redvers (Talk | contribs) (500 bytes) (rm "summary of chapters" - nor required) (undo).

No, I need an actual link or a diff and your username as a clickable link (created by signing your posts). I really really can't read your mind. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 21:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm new to this, I think this is what you want.

Is it inappropriate to create a chapter summary, or was it the way in which I did it?

[1] --Jacob D. Hyden (talk) 22:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ha! Right, yes, a summary of chapters is original research, which we don't allow. It's also much more Amazon than encyclopedia - a sales tactic rather than useful information. And it was unreferenced, but that's because it was original research so third party, reliable references don't exist, and unreferenced material can be removed at anytime by anybody. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 08:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biggie Murder Suspect

My man, it's not libelous to have a discussion about what might have happened. I'm trying to harness the power of group thought to have a discussion. I'll rephrase my post so that it is no longer an accusation. PeterCrapsody2 (talk) 09:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. And Wikipedia is still not the place to have the discussion anyway. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 09:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Gomm

Hi. I notice that you have previously removed copyvio text from Ian Gomm posted by User:Gommsteruk . It's back, this time posted by User:Timgomm(Hmm, same person? I think so. Also 172.188.227.188 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who has done exactly the same thing!), who will replace it each time it is moved. Being unsure how to proceed with this (I think it is both a conflict of interest and a copyright violation) I've asked for advice here, but no news so far. Fancy weighing in? pablo :_{: ... hablo ...} 21:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blimey, that was quick! pablo :_{: ... hablo ...}

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 4	24 January 2009	About the Signpost

Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions	Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more	Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Delivered at 04:52, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Did you msg me

I did not mean it as a personal attack, just fell sorry for him more than anything. The blog site I regularly visit are talking about him cause a Wikipedia user also on that site said Rodhullandemu wrote this.

<redacted>

I don't know where he wrote it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koolkittie (talk • contribs)

It's still no excuse for what you said to him. Don't do it again. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 09:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok I wont I'm sorry

re: "has made few or no other edits outside this topic. "

Are you being selective in your use of the above? I notice in your comments on the cork graham deletion page that you didn't mark the original section you cut and pasted by 76.232.217.44 with "has made few or no other edits outside this topic." Yet, a review of 76.232.217.44's comments and edits are paltry and "has made few or no other edits outside this topic." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicops (talk • contribs)

No, I'm not being selective. The template in question doesn't apply to the nominator, just to you and your other sockpuppets who are refactoring the AfD. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 09:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 99: / Line 99: @@
 :It's still no excuse for what you said to him. Don't do it again. ➨ <font color="red">❝'''[[User talk:Redvers|ЯEDVERS]]'''❞</font> [[User:Redvers/Say no to Commons|dedicated to making a happy man very old]] 09:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
+::ok I wont I'm sorry
 == re: "has made few or no other edits outside this topic. " ==