User talk:74.40.41.106: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:11, 11 February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Entrepreneur, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. :-) Stwalkerster talk 14:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to MIM-104 Patriot:

Your recent edit to MIM-104 Patriot (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 18:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Ford Bronco, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Sable232 01:16, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Robert E. Lee, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Robert E. Lee was changed by 74.40.41.106 (c) (t) replacing content with useless junk on 2007-10-08T21:58:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 21:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Robert E. Lee. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you.Jru Gordon 22:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jennifer Lopez, you will be blocked from editing. Tiptoety 22:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jennifer Lopez, you will be blocked from editing. — iridescent (talk to me!) 22:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Yao Ming. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 17:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to FIFA World Cup, you will be blocked from editing. Andrwsc (talk) 18:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Japanese Macaque has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 16:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Battle of Saratoga has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ➪HiDrNick! 15:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Battle of Saratoga constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ➪HiDrNick! 15:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Evidence, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Evidence was changed by 74.40.41.106 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-02-11T17:55:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Evidence constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Queenie ^Talk 17:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Evidence. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Queenie ^Talk 17:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tinker Bell, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Tinker Bell was changed by 74.40.41.106 (u) (t) deleting 8539 characters on 2009-02-11T17:59:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 year from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. _Gb^T/c 18:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:02, 11 February 2009 edit KoshVorlon (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 16,029 edits Your recent edits to Evidence ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:11, 11 February 2009 edit undo RandomXYZb (talk \| contribs) 15,343 edits Undid revision 270041822 by KoshVorlon (talk) - a bit unnecessary since they already had a vand4 warning and a block notice. Next edit →
Line 43:		Line 43:

	<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg\|40px\|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]]''' for a period of '''1 year''' from editing in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for persistent '''[[Wikipedia:Vandalism\|vandalism]]'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars\|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block\|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|Your reason here}} below. <sub>[[User:Gb\|Gb]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Gb\|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Gb\|c]]</sup> 18:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-vblock -->		<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg\|40px\|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]]''' for a period of '''1 year''' from editing in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for persistent '''[[Wikipedia:Vandalism\|vandalism]]'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars\|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block\|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|Your reason here}} below. <sub>[[User:Gb\|Gb]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Gb\|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Gb\|c]]</sup> 18:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-vblock -->

	[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg\|30px]] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits{{#if:Evidence\|, such as those you made to [[:Evidence]]}}. If you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism\|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]] from editing. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>— [[User:KoshVorlon\|Kosh<sub> Naluboutes, Nalubotes</sub>]]</b><i>[[User talk:KoshVorlon\|<b><sup> Aeria gloris, Aeria gloris</sup></b>]]</i></font> 18:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)