Talk:Caribou Coffee: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:21, 16 February 2009

Food and drink: Foodservice Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is supported by the Foodservice task force.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

I added more information about Arcapita (based in Bahrain) and the nature of Caribou's Sharia obligations. I intended to be fair, "just the facts".

I added Arcapita's own website displaying other investments of the company including The Tensar Corporation, Cypress Communications, Southland log Homes, Church's Chicken, Loehmann's, Cirrus Design Corporation, and many others.

Stub

I don't think that this article should be a stub, but I don't know how to change it into a normal article.--Daffy100 23:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to work on this article and get it out of stub.--phenz^Talk 04:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advertizement

What is your message in your ad, the women and two Caribou. What message are you sending, that will catch the attention of potential customers.

Thanks Steve131.187.253.130 13:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted a biased paragraph that was bitching about prices/treatment of employees. Wikipedia is not the place to vent about such matters. Kirkesque 01:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Caribou.gif

Image:Caribou.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOOD Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 08:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section

I just removed this because it was unsourced and did not make clear what Caribou Coffee had done that was actually controversial or who found it so. If there are sources showing notable commentators believe there is something sinister about Caribou Coffee's ownership - or that the actions of owners have drawn significant controversy to the company then we should reinstate it - rewritten and properly verified. I also think - given the lack of other sources the snopes link from the external links section should probably go. Without other coverage it doesn't that seem justified. -- SiobhanHansa 18:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ownership

Why are we mentioning a particular line of the "philosophy" of the majority stake holders? In what way does its inclusion conform to Wikipedia's due weight requirement for a neutral point of view? Are there significant actions the comapny has taken because of this philosophy? Is the issue considered significant in the business community? We need reliable sources that show this significance before writing about it like this. The philosophies of most major investors are not selectively quoted in most business articles here. -- SiobhanHansa 18:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The snopes article is outdated (links on it lead to dead-end pages) and the focus on the ownership is probably perpetuated by someone with interest in Starbucks. Seriously.

Headquarters

Why is the Headquarters listed as Minneapolis, Minnesota? It really is in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. and I would know because I actually live there. Alec92 (talk) 02:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 ===ownership===
 Why are we mentioning a particular line of the "philosophy" of the majority stake holders?  In what way does its inclusion conform to Wikipedia's [[WP:UNDUE|due weight]] requirement for a neutral point of view?  Are there significant actions the comapny has taken because of this philosophy?  Is the issue considered significant in the business community?  We need reliable sources that show this significance before writing about it like this.  The philosophies of most major investors are not selectively quoted in most business articles here.  -- [[User_Talk:SiobhanHansa|SiobhanHansa]] 18:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
+The snopes article is outdated (links on it lead to dead-end pages) and the focus on the ownership is probably perpetuated by someone with interest in Starbucks. Seriously.
 == Headquarters ==