Jump to content

Talk:Toronto Eaton Centre: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
start for sky, arch
Line 13: Line 13:
* The Terauley Street (an east-west street, parallel and south to Dundas) that was closed in the 1970s to make way for the Eaton Centre is NOT the same Terauley Street that extended north-south from Queen to Grenville and was renamed Bay Street (I believe in the 1930s). The east-west Terauley connected Bay to Yonge and exited onto the west side of Yonge to the south of where Dundas Square (the street) is today on the other side of Yonge (in fact, Terauley cut through what is now the Sears store). It is possible that the east-west Terauley was renamed Terauley when the much longer north-south Terauley became part of Bay Street. [[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] 11:49, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
* The Terauley Street (an east-west street, parallel and south to Dundas) that was closed in the 1970s to make way for the Eaton Centre is NOT the same Terauley Street that extended north-south from Queen to Grenville and was renamed Bay Street (I believe in the 1930s). The east-west Terauley connected Bay to Yonge and exited onto the west side of Yonge to the south of where Dundas Square (the street) is today on the other side of Yonge (in fact, Terauley cut through what is now the Sears store). It is possible that the east-west Terauley was renamed Terauley when the much longer north-south Terauley became part of Bay Street. [[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] 11:49, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
* Any thoughts on whether the Eaton Centre Marriott is officially part of the complex? In other words, does Cadillac Fairview have an ownership stake in the hotel? The name of the hotel itself is, arguably, not enough to deem it part of the centre. There certainly is no public connection between the two buildings (although they are physically attached, but as are many unrelated downtown buildings) -- you have to walk outside to go from the Eaton Centre to the Marriott. The Eaton Centre website does not show the hotel as part of the centre. Right now, I've left a reference in the article to the two being "attached", unless someone has better information. [[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] 12:03, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
* Any thoughts on whether the Eaton Centre Marriott is officially part of the complex? In other words, does Cadillac Fairview have an ownership stake in the hotel? The name of the hotel itself is, arguably, not enough to deem it part of the centre. There certainly is no public connection between the two buildings (although they are physically attached, but as are many unrelated downtown buildings) -- you have to walk outside to go from the Eaton Centre to the Marriott. The Eaton Centre website does not show the hotel as part of the centre. Right now, I've left a reference in the article to the two being "attached", unless someone has better information. [[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] 12:03, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

- There is a indoor connection to the Marriott on level 2 of Sears.





Revision as of 18:48, 20 February 2009

WikiProject iconShopping Centers Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconToronto Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Toronto, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Toronto on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCanada: Ontario Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
WikiProject iconSkyscrapers Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconArchitecture Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Earlier discussions

  • Can someone mention something about that fountain? I always thought it was special --Madchester 05:25, 2005 Mar 4 (UTC)
  • The Terauley Street (an east-west street, parallel and south to Dundas) that was closed in the 1970s to make way for the Eaton Centre is NOT the same Terauley Street that extended north-south from Queen to Grenville and was renamed Bay Street (I believe in the 1930s). The east-west Terauley connected Bay to Yonge and exited onto the west side of Yonge to the south of where Dundas Square (the street) is today on the other side of Yonge (in fact, Terauley cut through what is now the Sears store). It is possible that the east-west Terauley was renamed Terauley when the much longer north-south Terauley became part of Bay Street. Skeezix1000 11:49, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Any thoughts on whether the Eaton Centre Marriott is officially part of the complex? In other words, does Cadillac Fairview have an ownership stake in the hotel? The name of the hotel itself is, arguably, not enough to deem it part of the centre. There certainly is no public connection between the two buildings (although they are physically attached, but as are many unrelated downtown buildings) -- you have to walk outside to go from the Eaton Centre to the Marriott. The Eaton Centre website does not show the hotel as part of the centre. Right now, I've left a reference in the article to the two being "attached", unless someone has better information. Skeezix1000 12:03, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- There is a indoor connection to the Marriott on level 2 of Sears.


I'm really getting a kick out of the improvements in the article. Keep the good work up. --Madchester 15:35, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Top tourist attraction

  • Despite the suggestion that it doesn't rate above the CN Tower, the Eaton Centre is the city's top tourist attraction in terms of the number of visitors. From a qualitative perspective, I guess every single tourist has their own view of what constitutes the "top" attraction in their mind. I've clarified the reference. Skeezix1000 14:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anchors

  • Not sure where the number of 3 anchors (in the infobox) came from. Sears is one, and what else? The Bay is not part of the Eaton Centre. The notion of the shopping mall "anchor" is a bit of outmoded concept in any event, in the age of the category-killer stores. Skeezix1000 00:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there a Toronto Eaton Centre and a Eaton Centre (Toronto) entry. They're almost identical, except the Eaton Centre (Toronto) has the square footages of the major stores and anchors. They should really be merged.

  • When malls are first built, the developer looks for the firts big tenants and grant them huge discounts and rights to exclude competitors. These are anchor tenants.

Quality assessment

I have given this article an initial quality assessment of "Start". Its content is reasonably good, but the formats of its inline citations should be changed (use the ref tags) and increased. PKT (talk) 13:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]