User talk:CJ: Difference between revisions
rmv bot crap |
Added talk |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|algo = old(7d)|archive = User talk:CJ/Archive 19}}<!--END ARCHIVAL CODE--> |
|algo = old(7d)|archive = User talk:CJ/Archive 19}}<!--END ARCHIVAL CODE--> |
||
<!--EDIT BELOW ONLY!!!--> |
<!--EDIT BELOW ONLY!!!--> |
||
Hi CJ. Sorry if I am doing this wrong. I am not really a user. I am an actor and I have been reading the pages related to theatre. I saw your post on the [[Adelaide Repatory Theatre]] page and I think the discussion there is now being controlled by [[Paul Foord]] (who removes notability and deletion tags willy nilly) and a member of the theatre board, who obviously created the page to self-promote. I do not believe that the discussion is fair and balanced, or that everyone's views are being considered. As you are a member, I thought perhaps you could clarrify what Paul Foord is (and isn't) allowed to do. The page itself is highly questionable, and clearly biased, which a number of other visitors have tried to point out. ([[Special:Contributions/58.160.172.57|58.160.172.57]] ([[User talk:58.160.172.57|talk]]) 01:42, 7 April 2009 (UTC)) |
|||
==DYK== |
==DYK== |
||
{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk" |
{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk" |
Revision as of 01:42, 7 April 2009
|
Home | Users | Gallery | Sandpit | To-do | Talk |
---|
replies | |||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
archives | |||
|
Hi CJ. Sorry if I am doing this wrong. I am not really a user. I am an actor and I have been reading the pages related to theatre. I saw your post on the Adelaide Repatory Theatre page and I think the discussion there is now being controlled by Paul Foord (who removes notability and deletion tags willy nilly) and a member of the theatre board, who obviously created the page to self-promote. I do not believe that the discussion is fair and balanced, or that everyone's views are being considered. As you are a member, I thought perhaps you could clarrify what Paul Foord is (and isn't) allowed to do. The page itself is highly questionable, and clearly biased, which a number of other visitors have tried to point out. (58.160.172.57 (talk) 01:42, 7 April 2009 (UTC)) DYKBarnstarsIs there a Resilience Barnstar?. My mums nickname is your name. Chubbennaitor 16:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC) ApologiesMy editing on the Loose Women article identified vandalism in a previous version, I accidentally rollbacked to the vandalised version. This was not intended, sorry, I intended to rollback to the non vandalised section and only made a mistake. Douglasnicol (talk) 14:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
MissedWell, the title says it all really. I saw you reverting Jimbo's page a couple of weeks ago and thought "hey, CJ's back!", but then poof and you're gone again. I hope everything is going well in real life but don't completely forget us. :) Sarah 06:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC) P.S. You had the pleasure of missing Punk boi's attempt at being unbanned. I felt really bad for him but it had to be opposed. [1] He emailed me and told me he wanted to do it because ArbCom had rejected his appeal to them and I tried to talk him out of it but he went ahead anyway. Last time I looked at Simple he was talking about appealing directly to Jimmy! Sarah 06:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Indeed you are missed - I'll put that down for the record as well SatuSuro 06:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Corina brouderHello CJ. Was it an advertising? --Efe (talk) 05:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
FARShrine of Remembrance has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.--Avala (talk) 21:56, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to hear...Sorry to hear that you've left WP - hopefully it's only temporary... Grutness...wha? 22:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Adelaide city centre renameHi CJ can you please delete Adelaide_city_centre so Adelaide (suburb) can be moved back there. The rename was without much consultation and doesn't make much sense. See talk page. Thanks! Donama (talk) 03:43, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year!Hope all is well? Long time no talk. Another exciting year in Adelaide no doubt? YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:51, 2 January 2009 (UTC) SPSC talk guidelinesHi CJ, haven't seen you editing much lately. I was wondering if you could weigh in on this discussion here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:St_Peter%27s_College,_Adelaide#revisited. I suspect that the completely unverified allegations should be removed per WP:TALK, but I'm not sure how to interpret it. Would you mind making the call? Cheers, --Yeti Hunter (talk) 04:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Football (soccer)The debate to rename the term football (soccer) to just simply "football" or "association football" has opened again. Please feel free to give your opinion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football_(soccer)_in_Australia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.0.121 (talk) 02:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC) |