Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gender studies: Difference between revisions
Ricardiana (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
:Are you YobMod? [[User:Ricardiana|Ricardiana]] ([[User talk:Ricardiana|talk]]) 01:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC) |
:Are you YobMod? [[User:Ricardiana|Ricardiana]] ([[User talk:Ricardiana|talk]]) 01:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Questioning the "Gender Neutrality" of this Project == |
|||
Why is it this project is Woman/Feminism focused? It has a total of 3 (one not even created) topics related to Men, which makes up the other have of Gender Studies. This imbalance in focus, and the added presence of "Feminist Task Force" makes this more, "Women's studies, side notes on Men". [[Special:Contributions/173.33.142.104|173.33.142.104]] ([[User talk:173.33.142.104|talk]]) 18:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Crayos |
|||
Revision as of 18:09, 15 April 2009
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Gender studies page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
I need the help of an administrator!!I need the help of an administrator on an article involving a women's health issue. A male doctor is deleting the info provided by female doctors. If there is an administrator who can help, please contact me Drzuckerman 02:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Possessive Terminology?I'm not sure how using the terms wife/husband is necessarily possessive. It's noun describing a relationship. If I'm someone's sibling, parent or friend, I am not their property. Why does marriage necessarily indicate ownership? Certainly, the expression "man and wife" does suggest ownership, but "husband and wife" (or "husband and husband" for that matter) does not, does it? - TheMightyQuill 22:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm not as far off the guide as you might think Neitherday, when I said ""styling" or characterizing of a subject tends towards POV because it does not focus on the subject's own notability" I am including "referring to someone as the wife of (or husband of)". In the line: "A is married to B" such a POV or privelaging does not take place - that in my interpretation is the essence of the guideline. Just a BTW the gudielines have been moved to a new department for "countering systemic gender bias"--Cailil 13:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
| ||||||||||||||||||
Template:WikiProject Gender Studies Navigation
Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:11, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
Woman, "The Grandmothers", Herstory and Feminism
See discussion at: Portal_talk:Feminism
Should the Talk-Article be moved here? Where?
Millennium Twain (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Gynoid warring
Can editors take a look at this article (and its recent history). An editor there keeps moving all critical and gender discusion to a separate section, or out-right deleting it. As he has never added any information or citations, i have no idea what he think the article should be about, but all the sources i've read show that gender issues are the main aspect of this topic, and are the only reason it exists as a separate article, rather than being a section in Android.
Somemore eyes would be great. I was planning to get this to GA, but progress has stopped as i have to keep reverting deletion of cited material, and have to stop at 3 reverts.08:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Are you YobMod? Ricardiana (talk) 01:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Questioning the "Gender Neutrality" of this Project
Why is it this project is Woman/Feminism focused? It has a total of 3 (one not even created) topics related to Men, which makes up the other have of Gender Studies. This imbalance in focus, and the added presence of "Feminist Task Force" makes this more, "Women's studies, side notes on Men". 173.33.142.104 (talk) 18:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Crayos