Talk:Coaxial-rotor aircraft: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:22, 22 May 2009

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Aviation: Rotorcraft Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Start‑class Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

General theory needs moving to Helicopter

The info about angular momentum is all good, but isn't specific to this article. I think it should be merged into Helicopter or another article, and only a summary should be given here (possibly with a link to the other article or article section) Hertzsprung (talk) 12:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the discussion of angular momentum is too much for this article, then it will be too much for the Helicopter article. It should be summarized here with a link to the Angular momentum article using the {{Main}} template. --Born2flie (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Rotational maneuvering is a more complex topic with respect to these designs, and involves engineering beyond the scope of this article." - is it anything more complicated than rotation being accomplished by a speed differential between the rotors?

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 The info about angular momentum is all good, but isn't specific to this article.  I think it should be merged into [[Helicopter]] or another article, and only a summary should be given here (possibly with a link to the other article or article section) [[User:Hertzsprung|Hertzsprung]] ([[User talk:Hertzsprung|talk]]) 12:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 :If the discussion of angular momentum is too much for this article, then it will be too much for the Helicopter article. It should be summarized here with a link to the [[Angular momentum]] article using the {{tl|Main}} template. --[[User:Born2flie|Born2flie]] ([[User talk:Born2flie|talk]]) 17:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
+"Rotational maneuvering is a more complex topic with respect to these designs, and involves engineering beyond the scope of this article." - is it anything more complicated than rotation being accomplished by a speed differential between the rotors?