Kancha Ilaiah: Difference between revisions
→Why I Am Not A Hindu: better |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
His book, ''Why I Am Not A Hindu'' purports to the life-experience of the Dalits and Other Backward Castes and alleges that their poverty-ridden experience holds little connection to the Brahmin religious experience<ref>http://yogindersikand.blogspot.com/2008/02/interview-kancha-ilaiah-on-dalits.html</ref>. By explaining this dichotomy from his own personal experience as an OBC, he advocates the "Dalitization" of Indian culture. As Ilaiah claims, the Dalit philosophy prizes productivity over personal pleasure and values the graciousness of community over the "elevation of Brahmin men" at the expense of women and Dalits/OBCs. Ilaiah asserts that this shift in societal thinking will enable India to become a more prosperous and egalitarian society<ref>http://yogindersikand.blogspot.com/2008/02/interview-kancha-ilaiah-on-dalits.html</ref>. |
His book, ''Why I Am Not A Hindu'' purports to the life-experience of the Dalits and Other Backward Castes and alleges that their poverty-ridden experience holds little connection to the Brahmin religious experience<ref>http://yogindersikand.blogspot.com/2008/02/interview-kancha-ilaiah-on-dalits.html</ref>. By explaining this dichotomy from his own personal experience as an OBC, he advocates the "Dalitization" of Indian culture. As Ilaiah claims, the Dalit philosophy prizes productivity over personal pleasure and values the graciousness of community over the "elevation of Brahmin men" at the expense of women and Dalits/OBCs. Ilaiah asserts that this shift in societal thinking will enable India to become a more prosperous and egalitarian society<ref>http://yogindersikand.blogspot.com/2008/02/interview-kancha-ilaiah-on-dalits.html</ref>. |
||
The book was criticized by leading historian and [[John W. Kluge Center|Kluge Chair]] holder [[Romila Thapar]] for promoting [[pseudohistory|pseudohistorical]] views concerning the origins of [[Dalit]]s, and for abusing [[Max Mueller]]'s theories concerning the origins of social strata in India as ammunition for [[Caste]] confrontation (see [[Aryan |
The book was criticized by leading historian and [[John W. Kluge Center|Kluge Chair]] holder [[Romila Thapar]] for promoting [[pseudohistory|pseudohistorical]] views concerning the origins of [[Dalit]]s, and for abusing [[Max Mueller]]'s theories concerning the origins of social strata in India as ammunition for [[Caste]] confrontation (see [[Aryan#19th century]]). Thapar essentially dubs this sort of historiography as "extreme" and "weak".<ref>[http://members.tripod.com/ascjnu/aryan.html THE ARYAN QUESTION REVISITED], by [[Romila Thapar]], Transcript of lecture delivered on 11th October 1999, |
||
at the Academic Staff College, JNU</ref> Journalist and editor of the Telugu daily, [[Andhra Bhoomi]], M V R Sastry criticized the book for its 'undisguised hatred for the targeted community (Hindus), its crudeness, a general lack of scholarship and academic rigor, the abundance of cheap rhetoric, distortion of facts and finally, the author's total lack of understanding of the religion it seeks to denigrate'<ref>[http://www.bharatvani.org/indology/Ilaiah.html], Critique of 'Why I am Not a Hindu', by Shri MVR Sastry </ref> |
at the Academic Staff College, JNU</ref> Journalist and editor of the Telugu daily, [[Andhra Bhoomi]], M V R Sastry criticized the book for its 'undisguised hatred for the targeted community (Hindus), its crudeness, a general lack of scholarship and academic rigor, the abundance of cheap rhetoric, distortion of facts and finally, the author's total lack of understanding of the religion it seeks to denigrate'<ref>[http://www.bharatvani.org/indology/Ilaiah.html], Critique of 'Why I am Not a Hindu', by Shri MVR Sastry </ref> |
||
Revision as of 17:37, 8 June 2009
Kancha Ilaiah is the chairman of the political science department at Osmania University, a social activist and author. He is a Buddhist [citation needed]and a major figure in the ideological movement against the Indian caste system. His polemic is often labelled as anti-Hindu by several of his critics (both Hindu and Muslim),[1] including Hindu advocacy groups[2], and he has himself stated that he hates Hinduism.[3]
Background
He was born into Kuruma Golla (an 'other backward caste' and not a Dalit, or outcaste) family on October 5 1952 and was brought up in a small south Indian village. His family's main profession was sheep husbandry. He earned his doctorate degree in political science at the Osmania University in Hyderabad, India. His Ph.D. thesis was based on Gautama Buddha's political philosophy.
Activism
He is an activist in the Dalit-Bahujan (Scheduled and Backwards Castes) movement. He is also affiliated with the All India Christian Council, headed by Dr. Joseph D'Souza and other Indian Christian activists [2]. Ilaiah and D'Souza are also associated with the USA based Dalit Freedom Network. His books are promoted and sold by the Dalit Freedom Network[3].
He has authored several books and publishes articles regularly in national news papers and magazines. His book published in 1996, "Why I am not a Hindu - A critique of Hindutva from a Dalit-Bahujan perspective" became the best seller. He also authored God As Political Philosopher: Budha's challenge to Brahminism, A Hollow Shell, The State and Repressive Culture, Manatatwam (in Telugu), and Buffalo Nationalism: A Critique of Spiritual Fascism. Dr. Ilaiah in his efforts to internationalize the Dalit issues for the first time, ; on 6 October, 2005, he testified before a U.S. Congress subcommittee against the practice of untouchability and urged the US Government to work with the Indian government to end what he said was the persecution of Dalits and religious minority groups in India.
He has also been critical of the Namaste claiming it to be an indicator of social unequality in Hinduism. He says:[4]
Take a very simple thing—the Hindu namaste, folding your hands to greet someone—is a very powerful symbolic statement. It suggests that I recognise you but you should not touch me. In contrast, the custom that the Christians introduced of shaking of hands is a touching relationship, while the Muslims go even further and physically embrace you. Even today in the villages the Muslims are the only people who actually physically embrace the Dalit-Bahujans.
Variants of the Namaste are widely practised in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country, as well as Thailand (see Wai) and Cambodia (see Sampeah), and the handshake has nothing to do with Christianity, but is a practice that was originally carried out by warriors to indicate that they did not possess weapons, and was only introduced in Europe in the 16th century.[5]
Why I Am Not A Hindu
His book, Why I Am Not A Hindu purports to the life-experience of the Dalits and Other Backward Castes and alleges that their poverty-ridden experience holds little connection to the Brahmin religious experience[6]. By explaining this dichotomy from his own personal experience as an OBC, he advocates the "Dalitization" of Indian culture. As Ilaiah claims, the Dalit philosophy prizes productivity over personal pleasure and values the graciousness of community over the "elevation of Brahmin men" at the expense of women and Dalits/OBCs. Ilaiah asserts that this shift in societal thinking will enable India to become a more prosperous and egalitarian society[7].
The book was criticized by leading historian and Kluge Chair holder Romila Thapar for promoting pseudohistorical views concerning the origins of Dalits, and for abusing Max Mueller's theories concerning the origins of social strata in India as ammunition for Caste confrontation (see Aryan#19th century). Thapar essentially dubs this sort of historiography as "extreme" and "weak".[8] Journalist and editor of the Telugu daily, Andhra Bhoomi, M V R Sastry criticized the book for its 'undisguised hatred for the targeted community (Hindus), its crudeness, a general lack of scholarship and academic rigor, the abundance of cheap rhetoric, distortion of facts and finally, the author's total lack of understanding of the religion it seeks to denigrate'[9]
Ilaiah was censured by for publishing "Why I am not a Hindu" in a letter addressed to him by Dr. Pannalal, the registrar of Osmania University. The registrar stated in his letter that, in his opinion, some articles in popular newspapers on the book were increasing social tension. He said that Ilaiah should "write within the canons of conduct of our profession" and his articles "should not accentuate prejudices and inflame hatred among various sections of society[10]. Ilaiah has responded in interviews that the book aims to suggest ways to "eliminate the caste system" and proposes "unity on an equal basis"[10]. Following a complaint from Ilaiah that the letter constrained his "basic right to academic freedom" the Osmania University Teachers Association submitted a "representation" asking the Registrar to withdraw the letter[10].
A critical review of the book by M. V. R. Shastri, Editor of Andhra Bhoomi can be found here [4].
See also
References
- ^ Archive of Editorial on Himal Magazine
- ^ HAF Appreciates Congressional Hearing on Dalit Rights; Concerned by Biases
- ^ In an interview, Dr. Kanch Illaiha said, "Yes, I hate Hinduism" The Rediff Interview/Dr Kancha Ilaiah
- ^ http://yogindersikand.blogspot.com/2008/02/interview-kancha-ilaiah-on-dalits.html
- ^ Busterson, Philip A. - Social Rituals of the British
- ^ http://yogindersikand.blogspot.com/2008/02/interview-kancha-ilaiah-on-dalits.html
- ^ http://yogindersikand.blogspot.com/2008/02/interview-kancha-ilaiah-on-dalits.html
- ^ THE ARYAN QUESTION REVISITED, by Romila Thapar, Transcript of lecture delivered on 11th October 1999, at the Academic Staff College, JNU
- ^ [1], Critique of 'Why I am Not a Hindu', by Shri MVR Sastry
- ^ a b c The Rediff Interview , Dr Kancha Ilaiah
Bibliography
- Why I Am Not a Hindu: A Sudra critique of Hindutva philosophy, culture and political economy(Calcutta: Samya, 1996)
- God as Political Philosopher: Buddha's Challenge to Brahminism (Calcutta: Samya, 2001)
- Democracy in India: A Hollow Shell (edited by Arthur Bonner)
- Buffalo Nationalism: A Critique of Spiritual Fascism (Calcutta: Samya, 2004)
External links
- Rediff.com interview "The attempt to censor my writings is part of a larger game plan"
- Ambedkar.org interview with Ilaiah "Why Pull The Ratha Of Hinduism Without Having The Right To Sit In It?"
- Ghadar interview "The State of Dalit Mobilization: An Interview with Kancha Ilaiah"
- Bharatvani.org article "Kancha Ilaiah’s ‘Why I am Not a Hindu’: A Critical Review by Shri M. V. R. Sastry"
- DNA India Interview with Ilaiah "Institutes like IITs and IIMs should be closed down"
- Article by Ilaiah "Merit of Reservations"
- Opinion piece "Anger Is No Substitute For Substance, Mr. Kancha Ilaiah"
- Christianity Today interview with Ilaiah "Leading Dalit Rights Campaigner in India"
- Ambedkar.org interview with Ilaiah