User talk:68.251.40.139

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Two Brothers Brewing has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mod.^torrentrealm 07:29, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Two Brothers Brewing. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 18:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Two Brothers Brewing

The article has a number of reliable sources so is unlikely to be deleted. However, if you consider that notability has not been established you can register your account and list the article on WP:AFD where people will look at the article and discuss if it is notable enough for Wikipedia. I have noted that you have blanked the page and cut references out of the article, causing some disruption, so I have semi-protected it for a while. I would ask that if you have issues with any Wikipedia article that you enter into discussion with other editors, either on the talkpage of the article or on a WikiProject talkpage, rather than doing crude blanking of pages.

If you have any questions about this, please ask me on my talkpage. SilkTork *^YES! 19:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Two Brothers Brewing, you will be blocked from editing. Your removal of content from Two Brothers Brewing is clearly controversial. Stop doing it but instead discuss it on the talk page. Pontificalibus (talk) 08:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

We welcome scrutiny of articles on Wikipedia. You have questioned the notability of the Two Brothers Brewing article and three experienced editors have looked into the matter and informed you that in their opinion it meets Wikipedia's requirements. We have also informed you that there is a process for questioning the notability of an article, which is raising it at WP:AFD. Things may have changed, but a person needs to register in order to list an article at AFD - this is to prevent disruptive listing. I have suggested you register in order to list the article at AFD.

Even though we feel your edits are nonconstructive, time-wasting and disruptive, we are engaging in discussion with you in an attempt to explain our thinking, and the processes open to you. I feel we are giving you and your arguments rather more consideration than your behaviour deserves, given that you persist in cutting the article despite what has been said to you. I have again protected the article as this, I feel, will reduce disruption while allowing you to have your say. The alternative would be that your IP address would be blocked if you continued to remove legitimate content from an article after several warnings.

I again suggest you register your account and follow the appropriate channels. This should satisfy you that the article has been appropriately considered as notable. SilkTork *^YES! 11:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

I discuss this here... but it would seem that I only get accused [1] [2] of vandalism rather a resonable response to my resonable questionss.68.251.40.139 (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

I have said that your edits are disruptive (which they are) I have not used the words vandalism about you. However, when protecting the page, the software offers a limited choice of templates, the most appropriate one in this case was the excessive vandalism template. However, in protecting for a second time, I scrolled on through all the options to reach a blank template.

I'd like to stress that blanking the page and/or removing content and reliable sources from the article because you feel that the topic is not notable is disruptive. If you had continued doing that your IP address would have been blocked from editing, which would have prevented you from registering an account. I strongly advise you to create an account (a simple process which doesn't involve you giving any personal information), after which you can list the article at WP:AFD and give your reasons why you feel this particular topic is not notable. I have not got your talkpage on my watchlist, and will only respond now if you contact me on my talkpage. I do, however, have Two Brothers Brewing watched. SilkTork *^YES! 16:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

I guess you change the subject to me rather then the article??? See Policy WP:NOT for the source of my argument. Rather then spout you should justified your position. I say you being paid to protect this commercial enterprise.Contributions/68.251.40.139 (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

(removed by me 68.251.40.139 (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC))