Talk:Gyeongseong: Difference between revisions
m updated banner |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
It was Japanese city, so it should be called in Japanese way.[[User:Elmor rus|Elmor_rus]] ([[User talk:Elmor rus|talk]]) 12:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
It was Japanese city, so it should be called in Japanese way.[[User:Elmor rus|Elmor_rus]] ([[User talk:Elmor rus|talk]]) 12:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Requested move== |
|||
{{movereq|Keijo}} |
|||
[[:Gyeongseong]] → [[Keijo]] — As I said before, this article is about the time then Korea was a part of Japan, so it seems to be more natural to call the city in Japanese way. Also, according to Google, [http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=TMU&q=keijo+korea&btnG=%CF%EE%E8%F1%EA&as_qdr=all&as_filetype=&aq=f&oq= "Keijo"] is used 10 times more often than [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=INU&newwindow=1&q=Gyeongseong+korea&btnG=Search&as_qdr=all&lr=&as_filetype=&aq=f&oq= "Gyeongseong"] and old maps, such as [[:commons:1922 world map.png|this one]] use the name "Keijo". [[User:Elmor rus|Elmor_rus]] ([[User talk:Elmor rus|talk]]) 17:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:51, 4 July 2009
Korea Redirect‑class | ||||||||||
|
Suggestion for merge
Les talk about it at Talk:Names of Seoul --Appletrees (talk) 13:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Why not Keijo?
It was Japanese city, so it should be called in Japanese way.Elmor_rus (talk) 12:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
It has been proposed in this section that Gyeongseong be renamed and moved to Keijo. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Gyeongseong → Keijo — As I said before, this article is about the time then Korea was a part of Japan, so it seems to be more natural to call the city in Japanese way. Also, according to Google, "Keijo" is used 10 times more often than "Gyeongseong" and old maps, such as this one use the name "Keijo". Elmor_rus (talk) 17:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)