Jump to content

Talk:Gyeongseong: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m updated banner
Elmor rus (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


It was Japanese city, so it should be called in Japanese way.[[User:Elmor rus|Elmor_rus]] ([[User talk:Elmor rus|talk]]) 12:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
It was Japanese city, so it should be called in Japanese way.[[User:Elmor rus|Elmor_rus]] ([[User talk:Elmor rus|talk]]) 12:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

==Requested move==

{{movereq|Keijo}}

[[:Gyeongseong]] → [[Keijo]] — As I said before, this article is about the time then Korea was a part of Japan, so it seems to be more natural to call the city in Japanese way. Also, according to Google, [http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=TMU&q=keijo+korea&btnG=%CF%EE%E8%F1%EA&as_qdr=all&as_filetype=&aq=f&oq= "Keijo"] is used 10 times more often than [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=INU&newwindow=1&q=Gyeongseong+korea&btnG=Search&as_qdr=all&lr=&as_filetype=&aq=f&oq= "Gyeongseong"] and old maps, such as [[:commons:1922 world map.png|this one]] use the name "Keijo". [[User:Elmor rus|Elmor_rus]] ([[User talk:Elmor rus|talk]]) 17:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:51, 4 July 2009

WikiProject iconKorea Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This redirect is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Suggestion for merge

Les talk about it at Talk:Names of Seoul --Appletrees (talk) 13:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why not Keijo?

It was Japanese city, so it should be called in Japanese way.Elmor_rus (talk) 12:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

GyeongseongKeijo — As I said before, this article is about the time then Korea was a part of Japan, so it seems to be more natural to call the city in Japanese way. Also, according to Google, "Keijo" is used 10 times more often than "Gyeongseong" and old maps, such as this one use the name "Keijo". Elmor_rus (talk) 17:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]