User talk:92.39.205.210: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:52, 28 July 2009

Gödel's incompleteness theorems

I do not see, at first thought, any way to make the footnote more direct than it is; I left a comment at Talk:Gödel's incompleteness theorems to that effect. Rather than adding a tag to the article, please use the talk page to suggest a wording that you think it more clear. Unless you explain on the talk page, nobody can tell what you think is unclear.

Also, please remember that simply repeating the same edit over and over when it is undone will not make the edit "stick". It only makes other editors feel you are being unreasonable. So I urge you strongly to use the talk page instead. — Carl (CBM · talk) 11:25, 16 July 2009 (UTC) can see then open your eyes mathematics is a game and thre I have one thing to say to you - Godel was WRONG - Prrof is this:-[reply]

1) Godel's proof (GP) and G are members of the same system (whatever that means) 2) GP --> G is this "true" or not? I think so (note the "I") 3) Therefore GP proves G 4) And also G is unprovable 5) Capiche

Contradiciton.

If you can see open your eyes. Godel is an error. He was confused or deluded or a liar nothing good.

Jesus Christ is the truth so there can be none in Godel!!!!

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Consistency, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Consistency was changed by 92.39.205.210 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-07-28T01:38:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:38, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009-7-27

FUCK OFF GAY PERSON DO WHAT YOU WANT WE WILL BE BACK

u r gay wikipedia is shit google is worse if u want the truth look to jesus areseholes. He will kill u dead dead dead

Please don't resort to edits like this: [1]. They will not help your case; they will only be promptly undone by someone watching the article. I have been making an effort to honestly address your concerns, adding references and rephrasing text, in addition to explaining my edits on the talk page. I hope you can continue the discussion productively. — Carl (CBM · talk) 01:41, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Consistency. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 01:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Complete (complexity). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tiderolls 01:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MBisanz ^talk 01:49, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.