User talk:Danielsavoiu: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:50, 13 September 2009

This talk page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion because: this account is not active. For valid criteria, see CSD.

If this talk page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can check back later to see if you have received a response to your message.

Note that this talk page may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation added below this notice is found to be insufficient.

Nominator: Please consider placing the template:

{{subst:db-reason-notice|User talk:Danielsavoiu|header=1|this account is not active}} ~~~~

on the talk page of the author.

Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.
This page was last edited by Danielsavoiu (contribs | logs) at 12:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC) (15 years ago)[reply]

Welcome to the Wikipedia

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be bold!

User:Sam Spade

Aristotelian logic and Term logic

I just saw your additions to the Aristotelian logic: I'm sorry to tell you that your work is at least partly wasted, since it is duplicating content at term logic. I'm afraid the distinction between these two articles is not clear: if you look in Talk:Aristotelian logic, you will see a discussion where I proposed to merge the two articles, but nothing ever came of it.

I'm going to propose to merge the two articles again: might you be interested in helping? --- Charles Stewart 19:21, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS

I saw you signed your name on the article: you're not supposed to do this on Wikipedia articles, since the articles are meant to be shared, and signing suggests ownership.

Our forum

Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 18:12, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander for Admin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Alexander_007 ,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Alexander_007 . I've nominated User:Alexander_007 as admin. Let's vote for him! -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 20:15, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Romanians

Salut. Te-am contactat pt avem serioase probleme la articolul wikipedian despre Romanians. Dupa cum vezi, user-ii Jayig si administratorul SlimVirgin au pus cele mai joase cifre posibile. Cand am incercat sa intervin, punand numerele adevarate, am fost blocat pt "vanadalism", asa trebuie ca toti wikipedistii Romani sa facem ceva. Daca te intereseaza si vrei sa te alaturi, da-mi un email sau scrie pe pagina talk Romanians. Numai bine, NorbertArthur 2 Aprilie 2006

Romanian leu

I would doubt that Romanian leu is pegged to USD, as Romania is in the process of joining EU. In addition, it doesn't make sense. Romania trades with eurozone countries for the most part.

Exports partners: Italy 21.4%, Germany 15%, France 8.5%, Turkey 7%, UK 6.6%
Imports partners: taly 17.2%, Germany 14.9%, France 7.1%, Russia 6.8%, Turkey 4.2%

--Chochopk 10:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you might have accidentally blanked out the bottom half by using Firefox and Google toolbar. --Chochopk 10:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Romania

Buna! Am vazut ca tu ai fost cu ideea nominalizarii articolului Romania la featured articles. Excelenta idee. Numai o singura chestie nu inteleg. Feari ala tot zicea ca sunt 5 imagini necorespunzatoare din punct de vedre al lincentei. Tu stii cumva care sunt acele imagini? Daca el se refere la cele de la orase in sectiunea "History", sunt facute de mine si am tot dreptul sa le adaug acolo. Mersi si numai bine! Arthur 29 Iulie 2006

Treaty of Trianon

Hello, can you help with this article please? --Eliade 20:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template talk:Infobox Country

Hi Daniel,

Some users are engaged in an ever so avid discussion about introducing some new entries to the infobox. One would be the Gini index, the other, a link to Wikitravel. Please join the discussion and help us reach a consensus.

Thanks for pointing this out; I've just left a couple of comments. Best wishes, David Kernow (talk) 05:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Romania-plate.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Romania-plate.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We should only use copyrighted images on Wikipedia when a free image is not easily available. In this case, I see no reason to use an image has a "Copyright © Florida License Plates", when anyone living in Romania can go out and take a photo of a license plate (see criteria #1 and #8 from Fair use criteria). If a Romanian license plate image is to be subject of copyright (which I don't think it is, anyway), then let it be the copyright of the state institution which created it. Razvan Socol 06:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Teoctist

Salut. Vroiam sa te intreb daca tu ai scris in articolul despre patriarhul teoctist, acele lucrurile de la sectiunea Controverse? Cele care se refera la acuzatii cum ca ar fi fost homosexual si legionar. Arthasfleo 14:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dumneata — impolite??

Hi. You recently added a usage note to the description of pronouns on the Romanian grammar page, stating that dumneata "is only used when addressing a person that one finds undesirable, or not worthy of respect, but with whom one cannot resort to using the simple personal pronoun tu (you), due to not actually being acquainted with that person." Can you supply a source for this claim? It appears to be in dispute (see the talk page), and your note is likely to end up being removed unless it can be backed up from a reliable source. Richwales (talk) 17:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've read descriptions suggesting that dumneata might be used in a situation where tu seems too intimate, but dumneavoastră is too formal. What would you say about that? Are you trying to say that dumneata is perceived as condescending when used by someone who is not elderly?

On a related note, just how "close" do two people need to be before it's appropriate for them to use tu? What about, for example, a man and a woman who are well acquainted socially, but who are not in any way involved romantically? How would they be likely to address each other? Would it make a difference if, say, it were an older (but not "elderly") man and a younger (but still adult) woman — again, on good terms socially, but not at all intimate? Might dumneata enter into such a scenario? Or is it simply too old-fashioned, and the only choices nowadays are tu or dumneavoastră, with nothing in the middle any more? Richwales (talk) 00:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Buna ziua. Cusa ma daca Romana mea nu e buna. Tu-l sti pe User:Mario1987? Basketball 110 04:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He was blocked, and if you knew him, I wanted to know if he left you the same message: two Romanian users asked me (in Romanian) if I could speak to them via e-mail about "something." It seemed weird and I just wanted to know. Happy editing, Basketball 110 21:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:40, 12 March 2008 edit Basketball110 (talk \| contribs) 13,789 edits →Hello: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:50, 13 September 2009 edit undo Danielsavoiu (talk \| contribs) 321 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{speedy deletion\|this account is not active}}

	{{User:Sam Spade/Welcome}}		{{User:Sam Spade/Welcome}}