Jump to content

Talk:Nagarakretagama: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ciserayu (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ciserayu (talk | contribs)
Line 11: Line 11:


Best regards,
Best regards,
--Serayu 04:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC) (the lover of true history without manipulation)
--Serayu 04:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:49, 29 September 2009

WikiProject iconIndonesia Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Manipulation of history

Dear users,

Can we write history without manipulation? I see there is a manipulation in this map of Majapahit empire. Based on Nagarakretagama, which is a reference for the making of this map, the manuscript does not mention Sunda (Kalapa, Pakuan and Sunda Galuh) and Madudura at all as part of Majapahit. See also Kidung Sunda article in wikipedia! Kidung Sunda tells that Majapahit failed to annex Sunda.

Best regards, --Serayu 04:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)