Talk:Nagarakretagama: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Best regards, |
Best regards, |
||
--Serayu 04: |
--Serayu 04:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC) (the lover of true history without manipulation) |
Revision as of 04:49, 29 September 2009
![]() | A fact from Nagarakretagama appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Indonesia Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Manipulation of history
Dear users,
Can we write history without manipulation? I see there is a manipulation in this map of Majapahit empire. Based on Nagarakretagama, which is a reference for the making of this map, the manuscript does not mention Sunda (Kalapa, Pakuan and Sunda Galuh) and Madudura at all as part of Majapahit. See also Kidung Sunda article in wikipedia! Kidung Sunda tells that Majapahit failed to annex Sunda.
Best regards, --Serayu 04:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC) (the lover of true history without manipulation)