Jump to content

Talk:Asociality: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
banners
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WP Psychology|class=stub}}
{{WP Psychology|class=stub}}
{{WP Sociology|class=stub}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|class=stub}}


== The positive side of asociality ==
== The positive side of asociality ==

Revision as of 00:27, 13 October 2009

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPsychology Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSociology Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The positive side of asociality

I have added a small section about a positive side of asociality, and in particular related to the ability to be not too much subject to social influence and its dangers (cf. Milgram experiment).

Having say that, I would certainly not want to make assocility looks as something 'positive'.

Please, feel free to rework this part --Nabeth (talk) 09:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]