Jump to content

User talk:Woody001100: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 71: Line 71:


==[[WP:NM|Notability]]==
==[[WP:NM|Notability]]==
Hello. The reason the article you created keeps getting deleted is because the band does not meet Wikipedia's standards of [[WP:NM|notability]]. If the band does meet the standards listed on that page, you'll need to include [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] in the article. [[Special:Contributions/152.16.16.75|152.16.16.75]] == [[Exodus Extranium]] ==
Hello. The reason the article you created keeps getting deleted is because the band does not meet Wikipedia's standards of [[WP:NM|notability]]. If the band does meet the standards listed on that page, you'll need to include [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] in the article. [[Special:Contributions/152.16.16.75|152.16.16.75]]


That is a load of bull. I have enough notability! Seriously, why is it such a freaking problem that I don't have a list of singles on my page? I listed my band's history, where we're from, the members, and so fourth. IT'S NOT A BIG DEAL whether or not I have made an album. I still have a BAND that makes music. Not every band in the world has an album, so get off my back about this deletion!!!!!![[User:Woody001100|Woody001100]] [[User talk:Woody001100| (talk)]]</span> 2:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
That is a load of bull. I have enough notability! Seriously, why is it such a freaking problem that I don't have a list of singles on my page? I listed my band's history, where we're from, the members, and so fourth. IT'S NOT A BIG DEAL whether or not I have made an album. I still have a BAND that makes music. Not every band in the world has an album, so get off my back about this deletion!!!!!![[User:Woody001100|Woody001100]] [[User talk:Woody001100| (talk)]]</span> 2:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:18, 8 November 2009

January 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dale Earnhardt, Jr.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. umrguy42 20:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 1960s. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. :

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Real Libs-speak politely 18:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  JoJan (talk) 18:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JoJan (talk) 18:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rwanda, you will be blocked from editing. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to WrestleMania (1985). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TJ Spyke 22:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chevrolet, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chevrolet was changed by Woody001100 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-10-21T21:51:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:51, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Chevrolet. Proofreader77 (talk) 21:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Exodus Extranium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vejvančický (talk) 07:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this band notable? For further information on Wikipedia requirements for musicians and bands, look at WP:BAND, please. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for uploading File:Bochek.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Skier Dude  ►  08:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for uploading File:ExodusExtranium.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Skier Dude  ►  08:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Exodus Extranium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vejvančický (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The reason the article you created keeps getting deleted is because the band does not meet Wikipedia's standards of notability. If the band does meet the standards listed on that page, you'll need to include reliable sources in the article. 152.16.16.75

That is a load of bull. I have enough notability! Seriously, why is it such a freaking problem that I don't have a list of singles on my page? I listed my band's history, where we're from, the members, and so fourth. IT'S NOT A BIG DEAL whether or not I have made an album. I still have a BAND that makes music. Not every band in the world has an album, so get off my back about this deletion!!!!!!Woody001100 (talk) 2:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)