User talk:Synchronism: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Synchronism/Archive 2.
ZekeW (talk | contribs)
→‎Sock Puppet?: new section
Line 33: Line 33:


Yep, I've been suspecting this one... I'm glad you've filed the case. PolTX likes his games, doesn't he? <font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:LadyofShalott|<font color="#ee3399">Lady</font>]]<font color="#0095c6">of</font>[[User_Talk:LadyofShalott|<font color="#442288">Shalott</font>]]</font> 08:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Yep, I've been suspecting this one... I'm glad you've filed the case. PolTX likes his games, doesn't he? <font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:LadyofShalott|<font color="#ee3399">Lady</font>]]<font color="#0095c6">of</font>[[User_Talk:LadyofShalott|<font color="#442288">Shalott</font>]]</font> 08:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

== Sock Puppet? ==

Seriously do all the "investigating" you want. But I know I'm not one. I love working on wikipedia, but I have never had a previous account. Hope to work with you in the future. [[User:ZekeW|ZekeW]] ([[User talk:ZekeW|talk]]) 19:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:19, 10 December 2009

Chili Line DYK

Great job expanding the article! I like your hook, and I will stay on the nomination (I wrote a decent stub, and that was a redlink on the WikiProject Trains requested article list since June 2008, so I can take some credit). It's great to see that become a decent article now though - I expected it to be a stub for a lot longer considering how long it was a redlink. Again, great work! TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 23:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I agree that you deserve credit for the article ( I rarely take the initiative to start articlesl), the stub that you wrote summarized the main points about the railroad nicely and most of that text forms the article's intro now. 'Great work' to you too! Synchronism (talk) 00:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chili Line

Updated DYK query On December 9, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chili Line, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Albuquerque, New Mexico edits to Art and Culture section

Thanks for putting the Arts and Culture section back in the Albuquerque, New Mexico article. As a disinterested editor I was so angry at the removal, I found I couldn't say anything civil about it. Should I fix up the references there that need reference tags, or wait for the dispute to end? (The editor in question has not yet learned about Talk pages, I suspect.) —Aladdin Sane (talk) 06:14, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The section definitely needs to be trimmed but not to just a few sentences. The ref fix would be a good start to getting that section up to par, no matter what happens with ZekeW.Synchronism (talk) 06:26, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ABQ Skyline

Well, I can't seem to figure out why it came out that way, I knew someone was going to question me on that, It must be a mistake with the camera or the computer? I no longer have that camera. ZekeW (talk) 07:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Yep, I've been suspecting this one... I'm glad you've filed the case. PolTX likes his games, doesn't he? LadyofShalott 08:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sock Puppet?

Seriously do all the "investigating" you want. But I know I'm not one. I love working on wikipedia, but I have never had a previous account. Hope to work with you in the future. ZekeW (talk) 19:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]