Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Rollback (add request)

User:Mordgier

• Mordgier · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I'd like to try using Huggle. Twinkle seems quite nice but it certainly seems slower and clunkier to use. It's not been uncommon for me to find that a revert I was working was already completed by a Huggle user. Mordgier (talk) 15:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

You've been here less than two weeks, have just 200 edits, your very first contributions use WP:UNDO [1] and here you are requesting rollback. Strikes me you are not unfamiliar with Wikipedia before this account. Comments from you would help make granting easier I feel. 86.130.4.4 (talk) 21:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Bradjamesbrown is travelling

• Bradjamesbrown is travelling · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I'm going to be doing a lot of travelling in the next few months, so I made this account for airport Wi-Fi, internet cafes, etc. I'd like to have it marked as confirmed and with the rollback feature, which is enabled on my main account. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown is travelling (Talk to my master) 08:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

To save anyone having to trawl through the account creation logs, I confirm the above. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 08:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done The same reason you're not going to use your regular account while travelling is the same reason that advanced permissions cannot be granted to the temporary account. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I take issue with this decision, and believe the right should be granted. Legit alternate accounts of rollbackers are usually granted such requests, regardless of activity. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Can you at least mark it as confirmed to get rid of the CAPTCHAs? I have to have someone read them for me when I encounter one. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 13:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done. I added rollback too (hope you don't mind, Bwilkins) because it's an uncontroversial request. However, do let us know if you stop using the account, so we can remove the permissions if need be. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 13:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

User:armoreno10

• Armoreno10 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

To help revert vandalism. I'm a fairly new member (~1 month), but I'm a responsible Wikipedian that has been combating of vandalism and trying to help users understand what is and is not acceptable on Wikipedia by leaving messages on their Talk: pages. armoreno10 06:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

User:MegaSloth

• MegaSloth · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

To assist with reverting vandalism using Twinkle, also to allow me to use other anti-vandalism tools such as Huggle. MegaSloth (talk) 02:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done. I see no problems so I've granted rollback. Please remember to rollback only in cases of clear vandalism. Valley2city^‽ 03:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Ninetyone

• Ninetyone · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Think I've been here long enough, but always used Twinkle or whatever I have installed. Oh, and my other account has rollback (User:Ninetyoneschool) and this one was getting jealous. ninety:one 00:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

User:VernoWhitney

• VernoWhitney · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

To ease vandal patrol work. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Evb-wiki

• Evb-wiki · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I've been actively editing since fall 2006, and I revert a lot of vandalism on the pages on my watch list. Evb-wiki (talk) 19:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done Longstanding editor, good anti-vandal work, see no reason not to - maybe warn more of the vandals? Regardless, happy hunting! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks. --Evb-wiki (talk) 19:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Mizak123

• Mizak123 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I copied pages and pasted them somewhere else i dint know you cant do that?? Mizak123 (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Short answer, you can copy and paste from one wikipedia article to another, but you should see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia before you do that. That being said, we generally don't copy and paste entire sections like you did and instead link to articles using the [[brackets]]. I will give you a list of links to check out on your talk page. If you want to continue this discussion I suggest doing so on your talk page or my talkpage Meanwhile, for rollback please address the questions I raised below so we can review them. Thanks Valley2city^‽ 19:24, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

User:AKGhetto

• AKGhetto · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Been an editor and contributor since 2004/2005. Was inactive for a while due to personal issues but am back and plan to be active again. I enjoy watching IP edits and reverting blantent vandalism. Now that I am back though, it appears that a lot of my old tools are no longer compatible and am looking for another option. I feel I am a trustworthy user and will use this tool responsibly. Thanks! —akghetto ^talk 18:47, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done While we can always use another vigilant editor watching for vandalism, you've only done a small amount since returning, and you haven't issued warnings to the users/IPs. Get a little more experience with the tools you have (Twinkle, Popups, etc.) and reapply in a couple of weeks. Thanks. —DoRD (?) (talk) 19:33, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Santa Claus of the Future

• Santa Claus of the Future · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

To make it slightly easier to revert vandalism. Santa Claus of the Future (talk) 20:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done While I applaud your edits, you've really only reverted two instances of vandalism in the past month, and they were just prior to filing this request - that's really just not enough to judge on. Spend some time fighting vandals and then reapply. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Mizak123

• Mizak123 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

For reverting vandalism. I was removed from rollback last time because of bad use of Huggle. Now I use Twinkle and it really helps me concentrate on what edits are vandalism and what isn't Mizak123 (talk) 23:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate your exuberance but I see a contradiction within your three requests for rollback. You write below [2] that you have always edited for years only anonymously ("i have used wikipedia for several years but not in a account and sometimes find inaccurate untrue information") but here you say "I was removed from rollback last time because of bad use of Huggle." Anonymous users cannot be granted rollback so I can only assume you previously edited under a separate account as this account you are using is less than a day old. In order to consider your application I need a clarification and would also like to know under what name you have previously edited. In order to grant rollback we need to ascertain your history of fighting vandalism. If you can, please respond here to my concerns. Thanks, Valley2city^‽ 04:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Mizak123

• Mizak123 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have been using wikipedia for several years and really want to edit pages i have already contributed to many pages and want to contribute to more pages as i find some of the infomation on some pages wrong or innacurate I have reverted several vandalism edits and the rollback feature will enable me to revert vandalism much faster because I will have access to Huggle, but with Twinkle I am facing problem because I have to look at the diffs separately before reverting, and it takes a long time to fight vandalism

See above. Valley2city^‽ 04:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Mizak123

• Mizak123 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I want to help wikipedia expand and have more accurate information because i have used wikipedia for several years but not in a account and sometimes find inaccurate untrue information Mizak123 (talk) 13:15, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

• Comment: Rollback is for vandal fighting only, you don't need it to edit articles. Paul2387 13:29, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done per Paul2387 - rollback rights will not help you identify and remove inaccurate information. Best regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Кална

• Кална · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I want to put some pictures on the page about my village Кална (talk) 09:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done This page is for requesting rollback rights. I believe you may be looking to request autoconfirmed rights. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Acather96

• Acather96 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I fight alot of vandalism using Twinkle, and have a zero tolerance policy on vandals (all are warned, most straight onto level 2's). I do, however, understand that you mustn't bite the newcomers, and sometimes add verbal comments if the edit appears to be in good faith or such like. So far, I have only been involved in two disputes about my edits, and both have been resolved peacefully. I would like rollback rights so I could use Huggle and revert vandalism easier. Thanks! Acather96 (talk) 11:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done Acalamari 18:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

User:User name one

• User name one · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Long time editor with more than 7,000 edits. I keep almost 500 pages on my watchlist and do alot of reverting. username 1 (talk) 15:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Done. I see a good history of fighting vandalism and don't see any problems so I've gone and granted you rollback. Keep up the great work. Remember to only rollback clear instances of vandalism. Valley2city^‽ 17:54, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Heracles31

• Heracles31 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Hi, I've been doing cleaning with TW for a moment and would like to have rollback privilege for using more efficient tool. Heracles31 (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

User:takid123

• Takid123 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting rollback Takid123 (talk) 04:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC) i would be exceptionally happy to help you fight against the people (me at first) who decided it was funny to desecrate the wonderful resources here

 Not done Thanks for offering to turn yourself around, but you need to have some other checkable edits before requesting rollback. Take some time to get a feel for the place, make some good edits here and there (I can try and help you through the process if you'd like), and then we can go from there. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 04:15, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Vader7666

• Vader7666 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I would like to aid wikipedias combat of spam by being a "rollbacker". I know what is and isn't spam, useless text, or innapropriate. Vader7666 (talk) 22:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - thanks for expressing an interest in vandalism fighting. However, for now, consider using the undo feature (or even Twinkle) to revert vandalism and patrol the recent changes. When you've gained some more experience dealing with vandalism, say in three or four weeks, feel free to come back and re-request rollback. In the mean time, happy editing! Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Kvng

• Kvng · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Would like to rollback 19 January 2010 vandalism to Ethernet hub article Kvng (talk) 16:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. Thanks for applying, I appreciate that you're being vigilant on on reverting vandalism to these pages, but you haven't issued warnings for people who have vandalized. I need to see that you know how to identify particular types of vandalism as well as how to properly warn vandals before I can grant rollback. Please see WP:VANDAL. Thanks, Valley2city^‽ 16:48, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Kudpung

• Kudpung · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Have used Twinkle for a long time. I am an active member of several Wikipedia projects that also include pages which are particularly susceptible to vandalism (schools; lists of notable residents; BLP; etc.) I'm not a 'patroller' per se, but I have over 1,000 article pages on my watchlist to which I have a permanent RSS feed. I am familiar with the levels and use of warnings and leaving rationale in edit summaries. Kudpung (talk) 04:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done ~ Amory (u • t • c) 04:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Defender of torch

• Defender of torch · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have reverted several vandalism edits and the rollback feature will enable me to revert vandalism much faster because I will have access to Huggle, but with Twinkle I am facing problem because I have to look at the diffs separately before reverting, and it takes a long time to fight vandalism. Defender of torch (talk) 02:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done, keep up the good work and please only revert clear cases of vandalism. Valley2city^‽ 03:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Orphan Wiki

• Orphan Wiki · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Well, now I've been patrolling the recent changes for a few weeks now, I feel it would be of considerable help to have the rollback feature. Orphan Wiki 23:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done. I see no problems, keep up the good work and use rollback well. Valley2city^‽ 03:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Buggie111

• Buggie111 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I believe personally that I would be able to revert vandalisim faster if granted use of the rollback feature. I understand the consequences of misbehaving, and know what would be a trigger to revoke by usage of the tools. I have a little bit of trouble with warnings, but I will try to learn. Buggie111 (talk) 22:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Not enough edits. Give it about 2 or 3 weeks at Special:RecentChanges reverting vandalism and be sure to use appropriate warnings with vandals. upstateNYer 23:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Unioneagle

• Unioneagle · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have been patrolling new pages for quite sometime and would like rollback so that I can revert vandalism more easily than with Twinkle. Unioneagle (talk) 19:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done - Please remember to only use rollback for clear cases of vandalism. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 20:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Songrit

• Songrit · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I hope that huggle/rollback permission would make my anti-vandalism contributions faster. Currently I am using MWT. Songrit (talk) 05:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Could you please explain your previous request for rollback as seen here? I also don't see any warnings on user talk pages of vandals after you reverted vandalism. Thanks, Valley2city^‽ 06:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

The previous request was made for research purposes. As I said there, I am doing research on vandalism detection and thus I want to survey on the current methods being used. Since, it was not granted, I have to evaluate it in some other way. I found that twinkle and MWT are doing fine but they are kind of slow. That is why I request the right again. Also I think reverting bad edit is a way to contribute to Wikipedia. I don't put the comments on talk page because they are mostly anonymous users. I think it is pointless to warn them. Songrit (talk) 06:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. Even anonymous users need to be warned. Warning users is a way to track vandalism patterns and to take corrective action as necessary and most users who vandalize, whether registered or IPs, need to be warned. As Tiptoety indicated when you previously requested it, research isn't really a sufficient reason to grant rollback. However, reverting vandalism is. That being said, I appreciate your reverts of vandalism so far, but I need to ascertain that you can give proper warnings before I can grant the rollback bit. Seeing as I have not seen any sort of warning, I cannot grant rollback at this time. Valley2city^‽ 07:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Paul2387

• Paul2387 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I would like to be able to use Huggle, I have been using Twinkle, AWB and Friendly. Paul2387 12:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done I fail to see enough recent anti-vandalism work to warrent granting you the tools. If you continue to use Twinkle to revert vandalism, you could get rollback in a few weeks. (X! · talk)  · @790  ·  17:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Ajraddatz

• Ajraddatz · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

For use with Huggle, I was going to wait a while longer until I saw some of the below request. I do occasionally make mistakes, as does everyone, but I also have considerable counter-vandalism experience on Wikia. Ajraddatz (Talk - Contributions) 04:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done Acalamari 18:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

User:pilif12p

• Pilif12p · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Been using Twinkle to revert vandalism for a little while. Will not abuse the privilege if given. -Tanner (talk) 03:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Macbookair3140

• Macbookair3140 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have undid many vandals and I won't misuse this tool if I get it. macbookair3140 (talk) 02:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

User:MissAlyx

• MissAlyx · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

For using Huggle. Most of my edits on en.wiki are reverting RecentChanges vandalism when nobody else seems to be around. –  MissAlyx  talk  01:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Kilonum

• Kilonum · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

For use with Huggle Kilonum (talk) 23:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done, per your previous vandal-fighting experience. Best, JamieS93 01:19, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

User:el3ctr0nika

• El3ctr0nika · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I revert any vandalism I see on my watchlist and this would make my life a bit easier. el3ctr0nika (Talk | Contribs) 11:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. I see you have made a lot of very valuable contributions to the project, but you don't seem to have made very many reverts. If you would like the tool, I'd recommend enabling twinkle going to Special:RecentChanges and making 50 or so reverts, before coming back. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Saqib Qayyum

• Saqib Qayyum · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I do not want to see vandalism on Wikipedia thats why I choose to make some efforts to minimize on-going vandalism. Saqib ^talk 08:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Minimac94

• Minimac94 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

For reverting vandalism. I was removed from rollback last time because of bad use of Huggle. Now I use Twinkle and it really helps me concentrate on what edits are vandalism and what isn't. Minimac94 (talk) 07:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Seeing as Nancy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) recently revoked your rollback, I suggest you bring this matter up with her. Tiptoety ^talk 07:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Being discussed at User talk:Nancy#Rollback re-request. Nancy ^talk 09:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done following Minimac94's agreement that Huggle will not be used[3]. Nancy ^talk 15:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Don4of4

• Don4of4 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Reverted a decent amount of vandalism and I would like to have the rollback permission to help. (and to use with huggle) Don4of4 (talk) 20:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Not enough edits. Give it about 2 or 3 weeks at Special:RecentChanges reverting vandalism and be sure to use appropriate warnings with vandals. upstateNYer 20:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

User:clarince63

• Clarince63 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Rollbacking will help me a lot in revering vandalism with Huggle. --Clarince63 (talk) 13:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done. Histroical issues and decline noted but highly active and accurate. Pedro :  Chat  13:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

User:enti342

• Enti342 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

For use of Huggle. Enti342 (talk) 01:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done, thanks for your work. JamieS93 01:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

User:- )

• - ) · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I would like to be able to use Huggle. :- ) (talk) 00:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:25, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

User:SGH2010

• SGH2010 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting rollback SGH2010 (talk) 19:39, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm am seeking to upload images which I have copyright to on a page

Hi, in order to do that you need to be autoconfirmed. You can take a look at the specifics of what you need to be able to do that at that link. Meanwhile, since this isn't a request for rollback,  Not done. Valley2city^‽ 19:51, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

User:RoadieRich

• RoadieRich · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Majority of my edits are to remove vandalism. Rollback would make this considerably easier. RoadieRich (talk) 19:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. Sorry, but I see less than 20 edits total, and half of those were in May of 2008. You need considerably more experience with Wikipedia and particularly vandal-fighting before we give out rollback. Thanks, Valley2city^‽ 19:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Hornlitz

• Hornlitz · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have reverted edits for the past few days, and I would like to begin using Huggle for faster reverting. Hornlitz (talk) 05:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Your reverts and warnings look good so far but I don't see any submissions to Administrator Intervention against Vandalism. I'd like to see some good AIV reports before I grant rollback. Valley2city^‽ 19:29, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done Valley2city's concern however, is still a valid one. Please read WP:VAN and start making reports to WP:AIV as necessary. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:27, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Tntdj

• Tntdj · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I would like to help out! For example, I discovered extant vandalism on World currency and I would like to revert the multiple vandalism edits to the known good state. I think I must be one of few editors working on some of the more obscure articles I watch. Cheers! Tntdj (talk) 20:24, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Thanks for your interest, but I notice you have only started engaging in anti-vandalism activities since yesterday. I'd like to see you get in at least another sustained week of anti-vandalism activity before coming back, should you still want the tool. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Timotheus Canens

• Timotheus Canens · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Alt account of Tim Song (talk · contribs). Main account already has rollback. Timotheus Canens (talk) 13:54, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done The only possible concern would be impersonation, but it seems very unlikely from your contributions. decltype (talk) 14:09, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

And I would have to have created an account impersonating myself. Timotheus Canens (talk) 14:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I was looking for that evidence.. in all the wrong places :) decltype (talk) 14:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Az29

• Az29 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I'd like heavier firepower for reverting vandalism. Az29 (talk) 18:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - So far your reverts look fine, that said your account was created only yesterday. I would like to see at least a week go by before you are granted rollback. Tiptoety ^talk 22:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Thebigfan

• Thebigfan · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I want the rollback feature to make reverting the vandalism a lot more easier. I edit mainly the articles on video games and cartoon shows and I occasionally find vandalism on these page pages. I have been on here for over a year, so do you think that I could have the rollback feature? User:Thebigfan (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

I got confused when I saw that your last edit was in May of last year but then I noticed that you've been editing both as User:Thebigfan and User:Thebigfan2. First of all I'm confused for which account you are requesting rollback. Also I'm curious why you decided to create a second account and linked it to the old account? Meanwhile, I only notice a handful of reversions of vandalism but no warnings on user pages nor reports to AIV. If someone vandalizes wikipedia, once you revert the edit, in the vast majority of cases you also need to put a templated warning on their talk page and I don't see any from you. With Rollback you need to know how to use warning templates and I have no way to determine you know how to use them. Also I like to see a potential rollbacker demonstrate reporting users who continue to break the rules past a final warning to AIV. So for now,  Not done. Thanks, Valley2city^‽ 18:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

User:bayxsonic

• Bayxsonic · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I often find errors in blocked articles, like "brith" instead of "birth" in Roselyn Sánchez Bayxsonic (talk) 05:09, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

I made the change in that article. Meanwhile, It is not rollback for which you are looking, that is a different feature entirely. In order to edit semi-protected articles like Roselyn Sánchez you need to be a bit more established, so for the time being please look for articles that don't have the little padlock (the vast majority of articles on Wikipedia can be edited by anybody) and happy editing! Rollback  Not doneValley2city^‽ 06:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Supertouch

• Supertouch · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I deal with some relatively obscure corners of Wikipedia and am therefore sometimes the first on the scene of vandalism--or due to the obscurity of the topic, the first to notice it. Supertouch (talk) 03:21, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done Not seeing tons of vandalism, but you're a long-time user with significant mainspace edits, a clean block log, and a pretty good talk page, so I'm fine giving it out. Remember, it's only for obvious cases of intended vandalism. You may also want to try using more edit summaries. Cheers! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 04:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Nickliverpool

• Nickliverpool · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

ive never done anything bad on wiki! either with this profile or i.p address!! only good edits, have a look :D now i've read all hte other cases, i think i will safely say i wont get a yes? a month solid of pure un-vandilisim, that sounds difficult!! i have a job, but i guess i could try!! Nickliverpool (talk) 01:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done You don't have very much anti-vandalism experience at this time. If you want the tool, please start editing more actively and making about 50 reverts with twinkle or the undo function or so before coming back. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Ronz

• Ronz · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I'm a very active editor. This would be very helpful with the larger cases of spamming and vandalism that I regularly work on. See "Spam links" discussion on my talk. Ronz (talk) 17:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm not wildy comfortable giving this out as an arbcom case will likely be filed following the thread at AN/I where you were involved for what seems to be edit warring over an extended period of time. Still, I admit to not having followed it nor having read it very closely, so if another sysop feels it would be appropriate go wild. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

The accusations of me edit-warring are against situations where I held to 1RR, which was pointed out in the ANI. 1RR is my preferred use of undo. Other than BLP and blatant vandalism, I'll tag after 1RR, and have made the {{Linkspam}} template to use for such situations with disputed external links.

I don't plan on using rollback for anything even remotely so controversial. Rather, mass-vandalism, mass-spamming, and cleanup situations where others only cleaned up a portion of the problems. --Ronz (talk) 19:37, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Looking through your recent history, I don't see much evidence of major anti-vandalism work. Not only that, but most of the recent reverts you have been making pertain to only one editor, Tzahy (talk · contribs), who you seem to be having a dispute with. Unfortunately, I must agree with Amorymeltzer that for your purposes, the undo function will suffice for now. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Little grape

• Little grape · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I'm fairly active, often concentrating on sniffing out BLP COI edits by persons very close to the subject. Rollback would be useful in speeding this work. Thanks Little grape (talk) 17:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm not seeing a lot of straight-up vandalism reverts in your history, and definitely not since your block one month ago. I'd stick with the custom edit summaries for now. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Per Amory. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Rymich13

• Rymich13 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I am active in editing Government Officials pages. Having the rollback feature would be very useful for me in helping to revert vandalism on these pages. rymich13 (talk) 09:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - Not enough experience at this point in the game. I recommend editing for about a month (solidly), then coming back and re-requesting the flag. Tiptoety ^talk 09:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I also though might add though I have been on wikipedia for now a good three and a half years now and also what do you consider solid editing? rymich13 (talk) 09:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

It's not a matter of time, it's a matter of edits. Your history shows little use of WP:UNDO (the only cases I see are you undoing your own edits) and virtually no use of edit summaries. To get rollback, you should:

1. Actively fight vandalism with some regularity
2. Use appropriate edit summaries when reverting (If it's an obvious vandalism revert, "rvv" would be acceptable, but otherwise you need to provide an explanation)
3. Warn vandals and report them to WP:AIV if they continue vandalizing after a final warning

WP:TWINKLE provides most of the functionality of Rollback without requiring the privileges and helps with all the tasks above. You might want to try it out. If you like it, you might not need the permissions. If you feel constrained by it after a while, you can reapply with some vandal fighting history under your belt. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 22:45, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

User:NerdyScienceDude

• NerdyScienceDude · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I am an active contributor with 500+ edits who would find the rollback feature useful since I revert LOTS of vandalism. I mainly use Twinkle to revert vandalism, but this would be quicker and easier to use to remove blatant vandalism. --NerdyScienceDude :) ^{(click here to talk to me)} 19:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done, thanks for your work. JamieS93 19:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Mkativerata

• Mkativerata · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I am an active editor, particularly in the area of Malaysian politics. In this area there is not much oversight of a number of pages, and vandalism is not uncommon. I have undone a fair bit vandalism there recently and believe this tool would help me to continue to deal with it. I would use it with caution, only for blatant vandalism - I exercise the "undo" feature with caution as well. Mkativerata (talk) 22:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done. Even though I don't see a lot of anti-vandal work in your recent contribs, given that you're a long-time productive editor with a cautious attitude toward reverting edits, I'm happy to grant this request. JamieS93 22:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

User:MaximilianT

• MaximilianT · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have been editing wikipedia for the past three months. I've created some articles and have also been involved in patrolling recent changes using twinkle for the past 15 days. Having the permission to use the rollback tool would speed up the whole process of patrolling recent changes etc. MaximilianT (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done Acalamari 22:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

User:95jb14

• 95jb14 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I would find this tool very useful in removing blatant vandalism and also for work on discussions. In the past I have also been a recent change patroller, so I feel it would be a useful tool for this. 95jb14 (talk) 14:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done Acalamari 22:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Purplebackpack89

• Purplebackpack89 · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Had it at SimpleWikipedia for awhile now. Reported a couple people to AIV, undid many vandals, and reported several warnings Purplebackpack89 (talk) 05:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Can you explain the circumstances surrounding this please? Thanks, Tiptoety ^talk 06:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Has absolutely nothing to do with vandalism. A talk page issue...somebody didn't like that I started a few threads Purplebackpack89 (talk) 15:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Please don't misrepresent the situation. –xeno^talk 18:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

It was for their repeated changing of the importance ratings that a WikiProject (of which they does not hold membership) had set for Talk:Lincoln (see Talk:Lincoln#Removal of project designation), but they used edit summaries in doing so, so I don't think this should preclude Pbp's receiving rollback as long as they know it is not to be used for stuff like that. –xeno^talk 18:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Can we get a call on this? It's been three days without comment Purplebackpack89 (talk) 16:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done - This tool is not a big deal, but note that while it is easy come, it is also easy go. Any abuse or misuse will result in it being revoked without warning. Tiptoety ^talk 22:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Wexeb

• Wexeb · (talk · contribs · deleted · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

No vandalims, Twinkle helpMartín Coba Pulido → 21:01, 26 January 2010 (UTC)