User talk:Steve2011

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

That means you Coldplay Expert!

---

Do not archive

Threads in this subheader shall not be archived because MizsaBot will be confused by this fake timestamp. December21st2012Freak ^{Happy Holidays!} 11:11, 21 December 2012 (GMT)

WP:NODRAMA/2

Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! --Jayron32 01:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

:P

I see you are my long-lost cousin! Seeing the username and signature gave me a hearty chuckle. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 20:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Por Que?

why are you semi-retired?--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 01:45, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Because I am always too busy on Google Street View, and I don't have enough time to edit Wikipedia. By the way, Wikipedia is broken and failing. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at ≈ 02:28, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I know. But we can still fix it. And what is sooo interesting about street view?--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 02:45, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

It is a feature of Google Maps which you can see real-life photos of streets. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at ≈ 02:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Well you have fun looking at street lamps, im going to edit some U-Boats.--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 03:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Senor

Muchas gracias for our message. Mine was a consensual revision that included the views of others (some correspondence in their talk page) and largely language edits.

This said, I have the right to structure my own talk page as I see appropriate. But many thanks for your advise. This is sincerely appreciated.

Best regards

--Dipendra2007 (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi...

...uh, what exactly did you mean here when you said "Spongefrog, I did not look at your contributions"? Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 16:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

You edited that page a few hours before I did, and I thought you were going to say "no more looking at my contributions" which is the reason I putted that. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at ≈ 01:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Alternatively, you could have just been looking to see if there were any new RfA candidates? Most people wouldn't even consider that you were looking through Spongefrog's contributions. I'm sure half of the people on most RfAs are a common sight because they look for new people rather than simply looking in each other's contributions. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 01:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Ah, that explains it (2012 has previously admitted to the stalking of my contribs). I wouldn't have thought that, don't you comment at almost every RfA anyway? I just pop in now and then whenever something takes my interest, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 12:10, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

"This user has made over 9000 contributions to Wikipedia"

I notice that you have a userbox that links to Tiptoety's edit count. I assume this is because you copied your userpage from Tiptoety; nothing's wrong with that, but you probably should change the userbox so that it doesnt link to his count instead of yours. I would have done it, but it'd require the creation of a new subpage under your page and I didnt want to go do that without letting you know why. However I can help you create the page if you don't know how. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 23:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at ≈ 02:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_January_30#Crazy_golf

Hi, I thought I would drop you a note that there have been a few replies at your nomination here discussing a speedy keep. If you could possibly reply it would be most helpful. Thanks for your work with redirects, have a good day. --Taelus (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

User:John V. Kemm

Thanks for this. I've left a note on the user's page; I think it's the same person operating two accounts. Drmies (talk) 19:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Tip

You know, the fact that you seem to follow where I go and make edits to the same pages just minutes after I do does not help out our defense to iMatt's claims that we are socks of each other.--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 23:40, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 January newsletter

We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to Sasata (submissions), our current leader, who, at the time of writing, has more listed points than Hunter Kahn (submissions) and TonyTheTiger (submissions) (second and third place respectively) combined. A special well done also goes to Fetchcomms (submissions)- his artcle Jewel Box (St. Louis, Missouri) was the first content to score points in the competition.

Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:13, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Calton weavers

I do not understand. I just began this article, my first, which would be interesting to a lot of weavers. I was going to add more information, and I found you had deleted it. There are many sources, and I was going to add information from them. What do I have to do? Jomillsjo (talk) 03:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)