Jump to content

User talk:Spongefrog: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎RIBBIT: new section
Line 296: Line 296:


{{Talkback|Jakkinx}}
{{Talkback|Jakkinx}}

== RIBBIT ==

RIBBIT.

Revision as of 02:36, 5 April 2010

This user was "Wikipedian of the Day" for July 22, 2009. This user was a "Red Star" for November 7, 2009 This user was an "Orange Star" for November 11, 2009 This user is a Yeoman Editor and entitled to display this service ribbon. This user help to promote the article Ratchet & Clank (video game) to Good Article status. This user help to promote the article Ratchet & CLank: Going Commando to Good Article status. This user help to promote the article World War II to Good Article status. This user got "Did you know..." credit for Charles Widmore This user has received 30 Barnstars (NOT including hidden page/signature page barnstars) from various users. This user has Rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
I am prone to spontaneously signing out in the middle of a discussion. If this happens, don't think I'm ignoring your comment. I'll be back soon.
If you leave me a message here, I'll normally respond here unless either a) you have a different preference on your talk page or b) you have responded here to a message I left on your talk. This is partly because I have many helpful talk page stalkers who may reply for me in my absence. If I leave you a message, respond wherever you like. Chances are I'll have your talk watchlisted anyway.

Lord Spizzilizounge

Since you are using that signature now, it would be a good idea to register "Spizzilizounge" or "Lord Spizzilizounge" for doppelganger purposes. December21st2012Freak Talk to me at ≈ 19:52, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

checkY Done Spizzilizounge (talk) 20:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a need for two alt accounts?Abce2 (talk) 03:27, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sort of...it's a doppelganger, not an editing account...or...no, I don't follow you. Do you mean the two suggested by D21st2012F? I've only made one of those, and don't plan to make the other. But why does it really matter? Accounts are cheap. Like redirects. They aren't a huge problem so long as they don't make edits...or are they... Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 10:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

I missed my own Wikibirthday!!

Aargh! Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 15:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Wikibirthday M'Lord--NotedGrant Talk 15:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(Quietly mumbles to self: stupid snow) sorry I missed your wiki-birthday but I was digging out my driveway.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bzzsh, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 15:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

Yay

Well I now have just as many GA's as you LSF. How about that? Guess I am going on to round two of the WP:wikicup afterall.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 18:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that. I am glad to hear it. I was about to leave an irrelevant comment somewhere, but decided against it. Any chance of your WWII nom doing anything soon? I keep meaning to compile a list of badly formatted refs I can't do, but never get time. I've been on a semi-break for a while, but I should be back to normal activity next week. (P.S. - Was that "no to round two" supposed to be "on to round two"), Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 18:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take a look at WWII. IMHO, we should just tell Nikimaria that she can pass/fail it now. I don't really care. I mean, I can just re-nominate the article and actually get points for it in the Wikicup.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 18:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
She's gone "traveling". May as well give us until she comes back. Please?! I promise to work on it over next week! ...please... I'm ninety...four...point seven percent sure it would fail. It would be a close fail, but for such a high profile article...it needs to have the highest standards. I'm using the ellipsis too much aren't I? Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 18:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well what ref's are still missing? You seem to have more edits to the artilce than me now beause you have to fix these things.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 19:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No refs are missing (as far as I know). It's just formatting. Some are missing ISBNs, publishers, or years (well, that's books. Web citations are a different matter). Some were ordered differently, i.e. some might have been set out as "last name, first name, date, title, publiser, isbn" others could be "first, last, title, year, publisher" etc. I've added a citation template to almost every reference, as that formats them automatically, and added in info as I went along. Now I'm going through the list to catch the ones that already had cite templates, but were missing stuff, or were used incorrectly. I have a terrible system, I know. I would do more work on it if my browser didn't take so long to load the damn page... Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 19:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well If you've got everything but the correct citation format, then I guess I can help out again. I can't really do anything about the ISBN numger though..... I'll take a look at the refs though. PS, how far are you in correcting all of the citations? Are you going in order or just jumping around?--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 19:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've mostly finished the formats, it's mainly missing info now. I was going alphabetically (using ctrl+F) to begin with; now I'm going through the reflist one by one...shouldn't take too long...it will get done. If there's any I can't do, I'll write them down and bring it up at the GAR page, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 19:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
does that mean that I should wait for you to bring them up on the GAN?--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 19:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly...it may be slightly awkward with two people working on this kind of thing. By all means, do it if you want, or if you see I've made any mistakes correct them. Or get a head start. Or do a few random ones. Whatever really. Up to you. Right now, I'm in the middle of a string of awkward refs, with specific chapters written by different authors. My brain is about to explode. If you want to help with the (hypothetical) difficult ones, of course you can, but you'll have to really do your homework. I have a feeling some may be fakes, or very obscure self-publications... Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 19:47, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty much dito to everything. Trust me, I have almost every WWII related book/published source that I can think of and yet, I've never even heard of some of these refs.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 20:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Sorry for disappearing there, but then that's what the warning at the top of this page is for. By the way (and I'm not trying to critiscise your general spelling, I've seen you do this a few times), "dito" is normally spelled "ditto". According to the Urban Dictionary, one 'n' means something...rather different... Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 21:48, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OH well. I'll have to remember that.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 22:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re [1]

Have you tried http://www.worldcat.org ? :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 18:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Well...yes. Even that doesn't work. I'm beginning to think it's a fake, or hasn't been assigned an ISbN, unless I've done something wrong with the search function. Thanks anyway :) --Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 19:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, it's from 1953. ISBN's didn't come out until 1976 (or somewhere around that year). —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 13:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Argh! Can't believe I never noticed that. I would have knew as well (I figured it out with an earlier WWII cite). Well, thanks for pointing that out, I'll be able to sleep easy tonight, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 14:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Hannut

Well This is the last article that we need to work on in order to make Battle of Belgium a WP:GTC. I noticed that you made a couple of edits to it. So what do you think is left before we can nominate it for a GAN?--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 20:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uh...well...to be honest, I have no idea. Sorry. I'm not good at the assessment sort of thing. Probably more-or-less what you said at Dapi's talk page. Maybe if you linked up the footnotes to their corresponding references, though I might do that if I figure out how (and if it's appropriate). Good luck on getting it to GTC, though. If I were you, I'd nominate it, and even if it doesn't pass, all the issues should have been raised. Kinda like what happened to WWII. Nah, that'd be too easy......

P.S. - I should have those WWII refs finished by tomorrow at the latest. Well, not finished, there are about half a dozen ones outstanding. If I just CAN'T do them, I'll list them at the GAR, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 21:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sooo much for everything. I'll nominate the Hannut article and as for WWII. IF/when it passes, you WILL get co-nom status for it. Don't act soo modest this time! WWII is your third GA as much as it is mine. I'll also be sure to give Buzzzsherman, and TH partial credit as well. Think of it like this, it took one person to nominate it, but four to get it passed.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:16, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good good. I'll go watchlist everything in a minute. I was going to refuse WWII credit initially (if it does pass), but after spending hours of my life making those horrible minor edits - ugh - I don't think I'd feel so bad anymore. To think I joined Wikipedia to do this. I thought that would be my only edit! Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 21:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Same here. My first edit was to Glass of Water. Now, I'm writeing whole artilces! (I'm saveing this one for after round 1 of the wikicup. It will be a DYK)--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Glass of- oh, that glass of water. I find glass of water hilarious when printed, for some reason. How long does the Wikicup last anyway? Is it the whole year? Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 21:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What did you mean about Galss fo Water? It's a song. And the Wikicup lasts until October 31 of this year. Though I'll be lucky to move on past round 2. But hey, I was'nt even expectiong to gat any points at all, and yet I have 100! That's like 20th place! (See WP:CUP for the full list of rounds)--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, at first I thought you meant a Glass of Water as in a glass containing water. If it existed, it would be a pretty strange article to spend your first edit on. To be honest, I didn't expect you to get (m)any points either (no offence), but you've done surprisingly well. I think I'll work on Hannut's citations in my User:Spongefrog/Sandbox, which rarely exists. I use it for changes I might finish, but might not, in the same edit. If I have to stop, I save it to the sandbox, if I don't, I just add it straight to the article. I am a genius. Right now the cites look like a strange mixture of the deprecated harvard reference and...something else I can't put my finger on, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 21:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well thanks. I'll be sure to give you credit for this GAN as well (If we nominate it) And no, there is no article on a glass containing water. Should'nt you have know that My first edit was to be to a Coldplay song? (hense my name...) And yeah, I was supprised that I have 100 points for the WC too. Next year, you need to participate. You don't need to write DYK's, just promote GA's with me. (Or by yourself, whatever you choose to do)--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 22:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No! No-no, no-no, no-no, NO (to the tune of that weird opera bit that comes after "Let him go! Bismillah, noooo we will not let you go!" in Bohemian Rhapsody). Unless I end up doing more than I anticipate, I haven't done enough to justify (theoretical) BoH credit. Yet. I don't think I'd stand a chance in the Wikicup. I can't find articles to improve, and when I try to inprove them, I usually run them to a standstill when I run out of references. Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 22:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I can help you out. Pick and artilce and we can promote it together.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 22:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Argh! Sorry, I never noticed that post. I was edit previewing, and I got the message messages mixed up. Long story. Anyway, picking out articles is my problem. I can't find any! I think I'll just tag along and copy edit behind you. But I'll let you know if I see anything worth improving (P.S. - Finished WWII cites) Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 20:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Alright then. I hope that you semi-enjoy editing the Franco-Prussian War and WWII then. And I hope that you like Coldplay :) Their fith album is expected to come out late this year, and I'll be makeing several edits to that article. PS: That's great! Has Nikkimaria seen it yet? Will it pass now?--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 23:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nikkimaria saw it and- actually, you've probably seen it for yourself at the GAR. There's just one ref, no. 285 I think. May need to be replaced (but that shouldn't be too hard, as long as some info is tweaked slightly). BTW, wouldn't you be better submitting Battle of Hannut at the WP:MILHIST page? You'll probably get a quicker repsonse, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 20:46, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

A job for you

Well once we get the GAN of World War II and Battle of Hannut over and done with, I've got another job for us to do. Battle of the Bulge. This was once a TFA but now it's been delisted and is at start class. It requires some (a lot) more citations and for thge existing ones to be corrected. I have all of the sources that the article requires. (I'm adding them now) but I need your help to correct the existing citations as well as the links to other websites. (Author, accessdate, work, publisher, ISBN, Page number ect...) and I'll add in new citations that will be fully sourced so that way you don't get "Citation overload" like you did with the WWII article. Once the citations are fixed, I'll re-nominate it for a GA. Sounds good? Perhaps we need to draw up a list for us. Like "we work on X then we move on to Y then we nominate Z ect ect...--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 04:43, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good good. At least I won't get bored. I'll take a look as soon as I get time. BTW, I notice you're judging articles based on their WP:MILHIST rating, wouldn't it be better to ask for assessment there? (or maybe that's not the way it works, I'm not sure) You'll almost definitely get a quicker response too, the normal GAN page is backlogged like...something...that's...really backlogged. About the list, I'll leave that to you, I have neither knowledge nor preference, but maybe working on some of the Fall Gelb articles? Or you could even create one for Case Yellow. There's a Fall Rot article. Or maybe it isn't significant enough. Just a suggestion, take it or leave it, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 11:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well there's always User:Coldplay Expert/Case Yellow for you to work on. I hope to in a few years to so, get all of these to B or GA class. So for only 2 are at GA and only about 2-3 are at B class. Alot of work to do but for now, let's get Battle of Hannut and Battle of the Bulge done with. Only 2 at a time!--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 19:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

British English vs American English

Czar of all Russias, please go here[2]

--Frania W. (talk) 14:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Czar: left another comment there[3]. Cordialement, --Frania W. (talk) 14:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Imagine that this cookie cake thing has your name on it.

Hello, Spongefrog! Just stopping by to say hello. Hope everything is going well for you, both on and off wiki. I am still busy irl, but I still remember you guys. =P

Meaghan has given you a cookie cake! Cookie cakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! --Meäghân i can see your halo 03:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bulge

The German Army 1933-1945. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blablaaa (talk • contribs) 20:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

World War II: pass

File:WWFlagsBarnstar.JPG The World War Barnstar
I'm sure Coldplay will come thank you later, but thanks for helping out at World War II Nikkimaria (talk) 04:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my flipping God. We did it. We really did it :) (PS:You've got a message from me on my talk page)--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 04:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work Spongefrog - Kingpin13 (talk) 07:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AArgh! (the good kind of "AArgh!") A barnstar too! This is too much...me poor old heart can't take it... Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 13:27, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and thanks, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 13:27, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've got it

Well now that WWII is a GA, I've been looking for another article that we can work on. I've taken a look at Eastern Front (World War II), Battle of France, World War I and others but I think that Battle of the Netherlands is the next one we shoudl get to GA status. I attempted a GA of it back in november but it failed. We need the citations fixed along with adding other citations. I've got the adding citations part down but I'll need you to go around and fix the existing ones. This time, I'm not going to skip around and abandon the project like I have with other ones. I'll work on it all of the way until it gets to GA status.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 20:46, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on it! Actually I'm not. But I will be tomorrow! Don't worry about abandoning things halfway, you can always come back them; it's good to have a few things going at once. Otherwise you run out of stuff to do, like me, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 20:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to start uploading maps showing the occupation of the Netherlands day by day. I started on it a while ago but stoped. Anyway, I'll see you working there tomorrow.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

Hey, you're using one of these now! Why didn't you make your userboxes transparent though? Do you not know how?-Jakkinx 20:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you're back. And yeah, my old colours looked a bit...tacky. I imagine everyone'll have this format in, say, seven years. There's still one or two tweaks I need to make to it, I'll transparent-ificate(?) the userboxen then (though you can do it for me if you like (:). Nice image though, isn't it. It's fire!! Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 20:59, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I love the image, I'm so jealous of it :) I might get around to making the Userboxes transparent in the next few days. You can add more, you know. I also need to get my signature working...it's so messed up...-Jakkinx 21:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And also, my userpage has a picture of a sunset. December21st2012Freak Talk to me at 21:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lol. I actually think I had that one for a while...but then I switched to a different sunset, and just recently, I switched to a fire picture. Yours was a meteor before, wasnt it?-Jakkinx/Talk|Sign! 00:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Let me know if there are any problems.-Jakkinx|Talk|Sign! 07:16, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robbie Ray Cyrus

This redirect resulted from a now-blocked sockpuppeteer creating an article at Robbie Ray Cyrus which was a copypasta of Billy Ray Cyrus with some false info (mostly false chart positions) added. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah...right. Thanks. Funny coincidence though (if it is one). I thought there might be some retarget potential, but maybe not, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 21:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thank You for being the first person to sign my guestbook withing minutes of me creating it! --Clarince63 (talk) 21:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 21:57, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

Happy St. Patrick's Day!

Guinness
Happy St. Patrick's Day!!! Help spread the WikiLove! --Jakkinx|Talk|Sign! 03:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

The Redirect Barnstar

The Redirect Barnstar
For all the work put into Redirects for Discussion and for the insight offered on different navigational parts of the project. What seems like minor work no doubt has grand effects on the projects readers! Thanks for your work in the area, Taelus (talk) 23:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. I didn't know I was that appreciated. Thanks, Taelus, that should keep my morale up, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 09:26, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your very welcome, I look forward to working with you more at RfD in the future. --Taelus (talk) 10:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

Yay!

He's back! (No, not Jay Leno)-Jakkinx|Talk|Sign! 21:08, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help on New Mexico

Hello, Spongefrog. I am working on getting New Mexico to GA class. White Shadows reviewed the article, and he suggested asking you to help me. So, would you please help me improve that article? Thank you for your consideration. NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 04:23, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I'll take a look (I'm actually an extremely inactive member of Wikipedia:WikiProject New Mexico for some reason, helping here'll clear my conscience). I'm generally only good for formatting/cleanup sort of stuff, etc (specifically to references), so I can't expand/write too much, but I'll do what I can, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 11:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

take a look at this

some troll is trolling me about my spelling, and I find it funny. if you want to see the conversation, check out my talk page.--Orangesodakid 00:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello Spongefrog. You might want to check this out: WP:AN/I#Personal attacks from User:Spongefrog. Cheers, -- Meäghân  talk  23:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yeah. Real funny Meaghan. I was hoping for some rant by an angry troll, there. Nah, really it's okay. Thanks for interesting-ificating my dust-gathering talk page, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 10:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa...

As of my birthday, I now have more overall edits and live edits than you. And yet you joined Wikipedia 5 months before me....This proves that I need a life.--White Shadows you're breaking up 04:39, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have more live (and deleted) edits than both of you, and I have the same amount of live edits as you, White Shadows. December21st2012Freak Talk to me at 05:09, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) You think you need a life? Anyway, I only started editing in December 2009, and I'm well over 4,000 edits. Maybe I also need a life. NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 05:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I've slowed down, and you've overtook me. Pretty busy IRL, right now. Look at the "Click & drag horizontally to see detail" edit chart on my Wikichecker, it's so depressing. I'm back to my activity level of about...this time a year ago. I'll make it my long-term goal to catch up with you again :-) Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 09:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, that counter you linked says I stil have of one more edit than you (well, two now)! Just one (including deleted, which I count because of WP:NPP some people do)! Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 10:33, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh just wait until I make 60+ edits in an effort to expand U-46! It's only a paragraph but It has teh potential to be as long as this. But it doe'nt matter anyway, your edit count is a meaningless statistic.--White Shadows you're breaking up 14:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Meaningless statistic. Well said...must make edits edits edits can't let him beat me it's so close make edits Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 16:20, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Spongefrog. You have new messages at Jakkinx's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RIBBIT

RIBBIT.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spongefrog&oldid=354026496"