User talk:Nsk92

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5 /Archive 6

Prod of Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! --RL0919 (talk) 02:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

OK, I've listed it for an AfD. Nsk92 (talk) 03:22, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

"Importance" field

I will even agree that the concept of pseudo-Anosov map has high importance for low-dimensional topology. However, the purpose of the field "importance" is to record the priority of various articles for the Wiki Project Mathematics, so that people interested in systematically improving the coverage know where to best invest their effort (articles are sorted by fields and priorities on the corresponding technical pages). The apparent discrepancy had generated a lot of acrimony in the past, which is why it was eventually renamed "priority" in the visible rating (but not in the template itself). Not a big deal either way with me, but so that you know. Cheers! Arcfrk (talk) 04:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

I must confess that I don't really see substantial difference here. Shouldn't the articles on concepts and results of high mathematical importance also have high priority for Wiki Project Mathematics in terms of working on improving them? Nsk92 (talk) 10:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination)

Hi, Nsk92. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 January 18#Richard Tylman, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination). Cunard (talk) 02:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Phenotype

Nsk92, please take a look at the history of Phenomics and at Talk:Phenotype and at the bottom of my talk page. It's a mess, but I think we can sort it all out one way or another. Thanks! --Nuujinn (talk) 19:57, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye on these pages, but I am a mathematician, not a biologist, and my interest in these topics is rather incidental. Nsk92 (talk) 20:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Nsk92. You have new messages at Checker Fred's talk page.
Message added 22:06, 25 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

No I Will Not

No, I will not stop deleting Russian/Cyrillic from English articles.

I own two Encyclopedias, and I have read many other encyclopedia editions, and foreign language insinuation is NOT, repeat NOT standard, and does NOT need to be a Wiki standard, either.

I hope you are enjoying your semi-retirement, and I urge you to proceed to full retirement if all you have to do is hector people like me whose revisions are fully in line with what should be Wiki SOP.