Jump to content

User talk:Lil-unique1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
→‎Recorded songs: new section
Line 165: Line 165:


Thanks for passing the article. Really enjoyed your review. Its my 59th GA. <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 04:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for passing the article. Really enjoyed your review. Its my 59th GA. <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 04:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

== Recorded songs ==

Its not duplicated information. I suppose when a full-blown track listing is released you'll be opposed to listing that, too? Granted all (except for "Shake Them Haters Off") are songs that have been released as singles, but the section is not a sin to have. See JoJo's upcoming album, ''[[All I Want Is Everything]]'' for my point of reference, and I've seen this done before on other articles in the past. Get off your high horse. [[User:CloversMallRat|CloversMallRat]] ([[User talk:CloversMallRat|talk]]) 17:19, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:19, 9 July 2010


Speedy deletion of Charles Content

Just a quick note to let you know that I removed the speedy deletion template you placed on Charles Content because the article did not seem to meet the speedy deletion criterion A7. Please note that the same applies to Thierry Collet. These appear to be professional athletes, who are prima facie notable per WP:ATHLETE. In addition, since they play for their national teams, they are almost certainly notable on that basis too.

Please be aware that is normally inappropriate re-add a speedy deletion template when another editor (other than the creator of the article) has removed it, because speedy deletion is only for uncontroversial deletions. If you believe the article still needs to be deleted, please consider WP:PROD or WP:AFD which can be used for deletions which are not covered by the speedy deletion criteria.

I am not an administrator and I do not have any special authority in this matter. If you feel that I have made a mistake, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. Thparkth (talk)

I Am...Sasha Fierce

Hello, are you fine? I am doing well. When will you have a look at the album?

Hi i hope you are fine. Seems that i have practically lost contact with you. I know you are very busy. But tell me when you will help me with "I AM...SASHA FIERCE"? I am patiently waiting for your help which has always proved to be precious to me and my contributions made to BEYONCE articles. Please try to find out some time to reply me. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 04:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks a lot for explaining. I know what you mean by a copy edit but i didn't understand the "formatting of references"???? Jivesh boodhun (talk) 15:09, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi how are you? I need your help with the album. What does the phrase "citing that the idea of including two discs was universal." means??????? I need a better understandable sentence. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 11:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am deeply sorry for not contributing to the album for the time being. Actually, my grandfather just passed away. He died today itself. Please try to understand. See you later. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 16:53, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Each Tear

In the page Each Tear, it says in Germany that the CD Single is being released on June 11, but the source given says June 18.....also, i found another source that says June 18 if you want to add it also......Source 2

Fight for This Love

Hello, Lil-unique1. You have new messages at L-l-CLK-l-l's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Lil-unique1. You have new messages at L-l-CLK-l-l's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry!

Sorry, I do not make war, but you seem to be making a conspiracy against me. I apologize if I offended you, but your actions are hinting that it is manipulating the rules of Wikipedia for their own benefit (even if I do not know which). Just do not give me that talk is complying with the rules of Wikipedia because that's what the editors are: to comply with rules and editing articles (basically) and I believe you to be one, right? Graciously*Fr@nkl!nG* (talk) 00:40, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of I Look to You

The article I Look to You you nominated as a WP:Good Article status. Unfortunately, it failed as it needs more of work. Please see the review page for what needs to be worked on. Please take the time and work on it. TbhotchTalk C. 19:07, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hush Hush

Resolved

My apology if my constant reverting is driving you crazy. Seem a little obsessed with the matter but that's fine. The only reason I wanted to include that version of the cover is because it's more relevant to the article. The image created controversy by placing overemphasis on Nicole and those points are clearly touched upon by the article. Before, I attempted to include both images in the article so a comparison could be shown and readers could see the change but the image was also protested and deleted. I think it's silly to not include it considering that the group broke up after this single. I suggest using it in the alternate cover slot in the singles template or have it as the main picture and include a clarifying subtext. I just don't see any good in ignoring the image.

Also, about my alleged sock-puppetry. I created Ratizi1 after I switched computers. My passwords were saved and I forgot the password and wanted to still be able edit with a username. After many failed attempts I remembered the correct password and regained my original account. I don't use both at the same time but I did have to log into ratizi1 again so that I could redirect it back to myself. I don't know the procedure for my situation but I honestly don't care enough. You can delete the other account or whatever it is you do if you feel it necessary. RatiziOnecontribs 04:15, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly's Grown Woman and Ne-yo's Champagne Life

Do you know when Ne-Yo's Champagne life be on iTunes?....i havent heard any release date, which is wierd.....

I heard Kelly's Grown Woman will be on iTunes on July 13 although i dont know if its 100% true....do you know...

Buscaaweb (talk) 20:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lil-unique1. You have new messages at L-l-CLK-l-l's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

One last question on my talk page :) (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 02:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've promoted the article to mainspace - it looks superb, and I reckon WP:NALBUMS has easily been satisfied. I seem to recall !voting to delete/merge/incubate at some point, so I'm particularly impressed with the massive improvement.

I've removed the {{Article Incubator}} tag. However, I wasn't sure what categories to use so I'll leave that up to you.

Congratulations, and happy editing! TFOWR 11:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, this is the first article I've moved from the incubator. I'm reading up on the incubation process now, but if there's anything I've missed, or that you need admin help with, let me know. TFOWR 11:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly R

Sorry, I wasn't online when you mailed me. Jayy008 (talk) 19:36, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't read it. But visually it looks perfect to me, it looks like a lot of work has gone into it. As for Mariah, I don't really have an opinion now. She's my favourite artist, but she's doing too much, she needs to have a couple of years off to make a comeback, an album a year doesn't work any more. I also don't know why she feels the need to mess with "All I Want For Christmas Is You" that's like Whitney re-recording "I Will Always Love You" :/. I'm still excited for a new studio though! Jayy008 (talk) 22:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'm definitely excited for that! And yes, I can see her working with him, but I won't like it. I would prefer her more edgy as I love "Outta My Head" but "Pass Out" for me wouldn't really be her style. I'm glad she sees where "Echo" went wrong though! Jayy008 (talk) 22:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't even heard the leaks until you showed me them, I am so surprised that stuff like that was left off! And oh, what's wrong with "Memoirs..." :S... We've put a lot of work into that article over the past year. Jayy008 (talk) 13:46, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh gosh. Well MariahDaily has been approved for certain things, so I think I'll have to make them aware of that. Since the album was announced Via Twitter, that should be what's used! I'll take a look. Jayy008 (talk) 13:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ride

Thanks!! I had sources saved for a while, and I just decided to go ahead and stop procrastinating and fix it lol. I tried to help you contain the article for a while but mad fans would undo and add random crap and it was getting annoying. So when the article came out about the remix and how BET actually didn't ban the video, I decided to expand. And btw, congrats for the FTL article and I see how busy you've been with the Kelly Rowland articles. Speaking of Kelly, I liked Commander and thought it should have been sent to US radio, instead of RCC, which I really don't like. I've only heard Grown Woman once a while back, and from that initial hearing I'm not sure if it would fare well on urban. And about You Lost Me, I heard the radio edit and am really enjoying it. I can tell its a very strategic move trying to re-create the success of Beautiful, but they may should have used You Lost Me at the end of the year and chose a Tricky-produced track for the summer. Honestly, I'm just ready to be rid of the Bionic era, just because of the negative attention it has garnered. I think Xtina should go for not necessarily soul, but natural R&B for her next set, maybe aim at an urban audience. Its really a shame Woohoo w/Nicki Minaj didn't do well, considering how much Minaj is flourishing now, but maybe the track was just too explicit. As much attention has Minaj has been getting in the US now if they really,really worked the song with full-on video and promotion, I believe it would have done well. Candyo32 (talk) 00:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of the radio situation I hate the US radio situation now. Mainstream radio has moved toward supporting Guetta-esque dance-pop hits and acts like Ke$ha whilst almost dropping totally urban music. I kind of disagree sort of, maybe not Acapella or Commander in particular, but songs like this new crap Flo Rida has with David Guetta are taking over. Nowadays you may only find 5-6, if that many, R&B and hip-hop songs in the Mainstream Top 40. Back in the mid-2000s, pop radio ate urban music up with urban acts like Ciara, Usher, Beyonce, Chris Brown, Alica Keys, etc having multiple top ten hits. I mean if that were the situation now, "Ride" would have went to mainstream radio, so would have Alicia's "Un-thinkable". Now, when an R&B/hip-hop act reaches the top thirty, it is considered well, when back then so many were top ten hits. Hopefully we'll see a comeback for urban music in the mainstream. Diddy, TI, Trey Songz, and Nicki Minaj have songs out right now that are hitting pop pretty well, considering the times. Back to Kelly, instead of trying GW first, I think the Commander Urban version ft. Nelly should have went for radio first. And on Christina, yeah considering how Bionic the song did after the album was released, they should have did how Taio Cruz's Dynamite and Jason Derulo's Ridin Solo and released the single ASAP, but they ran out of time. And I think Woohoo's time is up. Unless YLM does EXTREMELY well, I'm talking like a top ten hit, they need to move on from Bionic. Candyo32 (talk) 01:03, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, it would, and I think even before because it has charted already. Candyo32 (talk) 22:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lol btw, we must have been thinking the same thing, I was just about to go request that Woohoo be protected. lol Candyo32 (talk) 14:25, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lil-unique1. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Good article reassessment.
Message added 12:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Westlife

Hi! About the Westlife information from Where We Are. You obviously deleted the unsourced content. They are important things on the list and I want you to get it back there even I can't find any source but those things really happened for the band. many other pages doesn't have sources but they are there to stay.

User:Myxxd (talk) 23:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair-use guidelines.

Thanks for that Hash. Really appreciate it. I thought that was the case too but somebody else has reverted my edit on Eminem's new album adding back the second cover and a link to a discussion where it says a second cover is allowed if it's different and widely distributed. I don't know if it's been put through and allowed though. Jayy008 (talk) 16:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody's already removed your nomination. Saying "Take it to ADF" Jayy008 (talk) 19:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Jayy008 (talk) 20:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

saturday

You are on three reverts on the saturdays article. Off2riorob (talk) 22:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. :) You seem to have inadvertently nominated this song for AfD twice in two days. ([1]). I have deleted the second AfD under WP:CSD#G6, since we can't run two at once, but since your nomination statement was slightly different, I copied the second over to the first AfD. It's up to you if you want to merge those statements into one or delete the second; it doesn't matter to me. You're welcome to remove it and my statement there explaining it if you'd like. Let me know at my talk page, please, if you have any questions about this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Woohoo

That's great. I also reported the user in question, as it seems the bulk came from him/her. I believe its the same one from before as the IP starts with 90..... Candyo32 (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about "Ride"? I think it should be up for GA after Basic Insinct is released, so album reviews for the song could be included, and by then (hopefully) it will ascend up the charts further. I added "shimmery synths" from a source into the composition, but wouldn't you think the song is electrohop rather than synthpop, since it really hasn't been referred as pop. I've really never understood the distinct difference between electronica and synths anyway since both derive from synthisizers. In my mind, I just think electro has a lighter tone or something i guess. Candyo32 (talk) 19:33, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lol well synth hop would work but I don't think its a genre. Most are released on tuesdays but some songs have exceptions. For example, Kanye West's new single power was released on last Thursday, and if i'm not mistaken, Ride was released on the Monday. I want to include a few more reviews before it could be a GA, and of course the chart performance would have to be done. Speaking of another, its rumored that "Get It Girl" would be the next single either this month or next month, after she starts to promote Ride more (which she really hasn't done at all right now). Its really done well w/o promotion and hardly no substantial digital sales. If Ride doesn't take off her next probably will, it's really Goodies/1, 2 Step-esque. Candyo32 (talk) 19:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I guess since the source says it Candyo32 (talk) 20:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, you can go ahead and do it if you want. But I don't know how quick it it will be corrected. Haha. Candyo32 (talk) 21:21, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw about Gimme That too. At first I thought it was too pop-ish but in order for an urban song to be a hit these days it has to work both pop and urban formats. I was hoping it was going to be Get It Girl, but I guess they decided against it. Candyo32 (talk) 01:17, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I saw your Woohoo talk comments. It's out of control. Anyway, more blogs are raving about Gimme That. Maybe it will be a hit. And i looked at the GW page, and is Urban AC Airplay a component of R&B/Hip-Hop? Candyo32 (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well I really hope Ciara does well this Basic Instinct-era. Goodies and Ciara: The Evolution were both magnificent (well the later wasn't so magnificent with critics), and seems like Fantasy Ride was just a total flop, comparing her past. She needs to come out with a really thumping music video for Gimme That, because I always keep in mind Ciara's first is really a dancer. Yesterday I was watching she and Chris Brown performing at the '08 BET Awards and he just had her there dancing and she fell back on his heel and came back up, it was incredible. She's like the Chris Brown equivalent of a Michael Jackson, they should have had both of them back this year on the awards to do a tribute together. Anyway, back to the charts, I believe it may be a component, because I've seen songs to chart on the R&B/Hip-Hop Songs, and have had airplay on Urban AC, rather than Urban. Candyo32 (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dance in the Dark

Thanks for passing the article. Really enjoyed your review. Its my 59th GA. --Legolas (talk2me) 04:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recorded songs

Its not duplicated information. I suppose when a full-blown track listing is released you'll be opposed to listing that, too? Granted all (except for "Shake Them Haters Off") are songs that have been released as singles, but the section is not a sin to have. See JoJo's upcoming album, All I Want Is Everything for my point of reference, and I've seen this done before on other articles in the past. Get off your high horse. CloversMallRat (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]