Jump to content

Talk:Schwa (art): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
CCNTN (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 42: Line 42:
'early days of the browser-based internet' is pretty poor wording. How about 'early days of the world-wide-web'?
'early days of the browser-based internet' is pretty poor wording. How about 'early days of the world-wide-web'?
[[Special:Contributions/72.94.237.189|72.94.237.189]] ([[User talk:72.94.237.189|talk]]) 23:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/72.94.237.189|72.94.237.189]] ([[User talk:72.94.237.189|talk]]) 23:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
== http://schwazone.com/ ==
This site lists Tim Mcfall as the owner. Was Bill Barker a pseudonym. Is this guy just stealing his work? Is this run by the publishers of the 90's books?--[[Special:Contributions/151.213.209.168|151.213.209.168]] ([[User talk:151.213.209.168|talk]]) 19:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:40, 17 July 2010

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Coonfirmation

While I admit the fact that the contact information from Compuwatcher is compelling, the fact that Barker no longer uses his original P.O. box might be as much to blame for the registry information going through a different source. Can anybody gain information from Compuwatcher or the Tim McFall contact person if this will have anything to do with the original Bill Barker Schwa properties? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.60.26 (talk) 03:19, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the P.O. Box hasn't belonged to Barker for years, it of course wouldn't be registered to that address. Barker has always done Schwa Corporate stuff semi-anonymously. Is there some reason why the information about it being registered to a third party is even relevant? If no rationale exists for its mention that isn't par for the course for Barker, it should be removed. --98.198.173.247 (talk) 06:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just noted that Compuwatcher owns two other Schwa-related sites (schwapyramid.com and schwareturns.com). Whether this makes his inclusion any more relevant or not, I leave that up to you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.125.91.69 (talk) 04:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whereabouts

--can someone verify and cite this?
Posted on 07 August 2006 by 69.51.151.90. -Ashley Pomeroy 01:11, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can verify that the statement edited out was completely false as to facts of whereabout and current status of Mr. Barker and constitutes libel. WIlliam is currently working on a continuation of the brilliant series SCHWA and COUNTERSCHWA----WATCH FOR IT ! ! !

Fair use rationale for Image:Schwa world operations manual.jpg

Image:Schwa world operations manual.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Schwa pyramid screenshot.gif

Image:Schwa pyramid screenshot.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Internet) History

"Barker also created and ran a (now defunct) labyrinthine website early in the days of the browser-based internet." 'early days of the browser-based internet' is pretty poor wording. How about 'early days of the world-wide-web'? 72.94.237.189 (talk) 23:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This site lists Tim Mcfall as the owner. Was Bill Barker a pseudonym. Is this guy just stealing his work? Is this run by the publishers of the 90's books?--151.213.209.168 (talk) 19:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]